http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Guedes-Neto (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
da Cruz Handel Kramel,de Almeida Paz-Neto Antônio,Monteiro Vaneska Barbosa,Gondim-Júnior Manoel Guedes Correa 한국응용곤충학회 2023 Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology Vol.26 No.1
Atheloca bondari Heinrich is an opportunistic lepidopteran that uses necrosis caused by the mite Aceria guerreronis Keifer, the most important pest of the coconut palm, to access the meristematic region of coconuts. Because of this moth-mite positive association, pesticides used to control A. guerreronis (abamectin, azadirachtin, fenpyr oximate, and pyridaben) may impact A. bondari caterpillar behavior and/or survival. Thus, we used three methodologies (toothpick, triangle, and mesocarp fragment) to evaluate mortality caused by abamectin, the most commonly used pesticide to control A. guerreronis. The toothpick method proved to be suitable for toxicity tests of A. bondari caterpillars. Subsequently, the mortality caused by these four pesticides was evaluated, and abamectin caused 100% mortality in A. bondari caterpillars. Abamectin showed higher toxicity than the other pesticides to A. bondari caterpillars, with LC 50 and LC 95 values of 1.35 and 3.64 mg/L, respectively. The preference test showed that A. bondari caterpillars infested pesticide-treated fruits in the same proportion as untreated fruits. In the behavioral test, A. bondari caterpillars showed lower locomotor speed when exposed to surfaces with aba mectin, azadirachtin, and fenpyroximate residues. Our study presented that pesticides used to control A. guerreronis affect the behavior and survival of A. bondari caterpillars. We discuss how spraying these pesticides can indirectly control the population of A. bondari, reducing the impact of this moth on coconut production, and modifying the importance of this species as a pest of coconut palm.
-
Maria Fernanda Costa Cabral,Roberto Luiz de Menezes Martinho,Manoel Valcácio Guedes-Neto,Maria Augusta Bessa Rebelo,Danielson Guedes Pontes,Flávia Cohen-Carneiro 대한치과보존학회 2015 Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics Vol.40 No.3
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the fluoride release of conventional glass ionomer cements (GICs) and resin-modified GICs. Materials and Methods: The cements were grouped as follows: G1 (Vidrion R, SS White), G2 (Vitro Fil, DFL), G3 (Vitro Molar, DFL), G4 (Bioglass R, Biodinâmica), and G5 (Ketac Fil, 3M ESPE), as conventional GICs, and G6 (Vitremer, 3M ESPE), G7 (Vitro Fil LC, DFL), and G8 (Resiglass, Biodinâmica) as resin-modified GICs. Six specimens (8.60 mm in diameter; 1.65 mm in thickness) of each material were prepared using a stainless steel mold. The specimens were immersed in a demineralizing solution (pH 4.3) for 6 hr and a remineralizing solution (pH 7.0) for 18 hr a day. The fluoride ions were measured for 15 days. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test with 5% significance were applied. Results: The highest amounts of fluoride release were found during the first 24 hr for all cements, decreasing abruptly on day 2, and reaching gradually decreasing levels on day 7. Based on these results, the decreasing scale of fluoride release was as follows: G2 > G3 > G8 = G4 = G7 > G6 = G1 > G5 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: There were wide variations among the materials in terms of the cumulative amount of fluoride ion released, and the amount of fluoride release could not be attributed to the category of cement, that is, conventional GICs or resin-modified GICs.
-
Cabral, Maria Fernanda Costa,Martinho, Roberto Luiz de Menezes,Guedes-Neto, Manoel Valcacio,Rebelo, Maria Augusta Bessa,Pontes, Danielson Guedes,Cohen-Carneiro, Flavia The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2015 Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics Vol.40 No.3
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the fluoride release of conventional glass ionomer cements (GICs) and resin-modified GICs. Materials and Methods: The cements were grouped as follows: G1 (Vidrion R, SS White), G2 (Vitro Fil, DFL), G3 (Vitro Molar, DFL), G4 (Bioglass R, Biodinamica), and G5 (Ketac Fil, 3M ESPE), as conventional GICs, and G6 (Vitremer, 3M ESPE), G7 (Vitro Fil LC, DFL), and G8 (Resiglass, Biodinamica) as resin-modified GICs. Six specimens (8.60 mm in diameter; 1.65 mm in thickness) of each material were prepared using a stainless steel mold. The specimens were immersed in a demineralizing solution (pH 4.3) for 6 hr and a remineralizing solution (pH 7.0) for 18 hr a day. The fluoride ions were measured for 15 days. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test with 5% significance were applied. Results: The highest amounts of fluoride release were found during the first 24 hr for all cements, decreasing abruptly on day 2, and reaching gradually decreasing levels on day 7. Based on these results, the decreasing scale of fluoride release was as follows: G2 > G3 > G8 = G4 = G7 > G6 = G1 > G5 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: There were wide variations among the materials in terms of the cumulative amount of fluoride ion released, and the amount of fluoride release could not be attributed to the category of cement, that is, conventional GICs or resin-modified GICs.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
