VECM을 이용한 방한 베트남관광객 수요와 한국-베트남 무역과의 인과성

김도훈 ( Kim¸ Do-hoon ) (사)한국마이스관광학회(구 한국컨벤션학회) 2020 MICE관광연구 Vol.20 No.2

The purpose of this study is first, to identify the causality between the demand of Vietnamese tourists visiting Korea and the Korean-Vietnam trade; second, to empirically analyze and predict the long-run and short-run dynamic effects of the two. Estimates of the VECM showed that the long-run elasticity of the Korean-Vietnam trade and the demand of Vietnamese Tourists visiting Korea was 1.289. As a result of the analysis of the Impulse Response Function, the trade shock between Korea and Vietnam had a positive effect on the demand of Vietnamese Tourists visiting Korea from two months. And the impact of the demand of Vietnamese Tourists visiting Korea had a positive effect on the trade for the first two months, but not much in the long run. As a result of Forecast Error Variance Decomposition, it is estimated that if the trade between Korea and Vietnam changes, the effect on the demand for tourists from Vietnam will gradually increase.

민사소송상 개인정보 보호에 관한 소고

김도훈 ( Kim¸ Do Hoon ) 홍익대학교 법학연구소 2021 홍익법학 Vol.22 No.3

디지털 사회로의 진입에 따라 각종 개인정보가 전자적인 형태로 활용되고, 사회전반에 걸쳐 소셜 네트워크 서비스가 널리 사용되면서, 개인정보의 노출 가능성이 비약적으로 증가하였다. 이로 인해 개인정보 노출에 따른 피해 사례가 이어지고 있고, 개인정보 보호에 관한 요구도 지속적으로 증가하고 있다. 개인정보 노출이 항상 피해발생으로 이어지는 것은 아니지만 노출 그 자체가 피해가능성을 갖는다는 것이 문제이다. 이러한 개인정보 노출은 공개주의를 원칙으로 하는 민사소송에서도 문제가 되고 있다. 이에 본고는 민사소송상 개인정보 수집 및 기재에 관한 법적인 근거와 관련 현황을 정리 및 검토한 후, 이에 관한 개선방안을 다음과 같이 정리하였다. 첫째, 민사소송상 법원에 의한 개인정보의 수집이 필요한가? 관할 및 당사자의 특정, 송달 등을 위해 법원은 개인정보 수집이 필요하다. 법원은 개인정보 수집에 대한 정당한 법적 권한을 갖고 있으며, 절차진행을 위한 공적 목적에 의한 것이므로 문제가 없다. 다만 법원에 의해 수집된 개인정보가 각종 소송기록 등에 기재됨으로써 노출가능성을 갖는다는 것이 문제이다. 따라서 수집 대상을 제한하는 방안과 기재된 개인정보에 대한 보호조치를 강화하는 방안이 필요하다. 둘째, 법원은 성명, 주소, 연락처, 주민등록번호를 필수적으로 수집해야 하는가? 이를 모두 수집할 경우 소송상 원활한 절차 진행에 도움이 되지만 모든 개인정보가 항상 필요한 것은 아니며, 개인정보는 노출 그 자체가 문제이므로 수집 자체를 줄이는 것이 합리적이다. 이는 원칙을 준수하는 것에서 출발할 필요가 있다. 즉 민사소송 관련 법규에 근거하여 필수적 기재 정보와 임의적 기재 정보를 구분하여 표기하고 이를 안내하여, 당사자가 그 기재여부를 선택하도록 하는 것이 타당하다. 셋째, 개인정보 수집 제한에 관한 적절한 방법은 무엇인가? 개인정보 보호의 관점에서 수집 제한이 필요하지만, 법원의 수집에 대한 필요 역시 근거가 있으므로 일방적인 제한은 적절치 않다. 따라서 개인정보 수집의 필요가 적은 절차에서 부분적으로 수집을 제한하는 것부터 시작하여 변화의 토대를 마련하는 것이 필요하다. 쌍방당사자가 전자소송으로 진행하는 경우 주소의 수집을 제한하는 것과 소송대리인에 의한 소송을 진행하는 경우 주소에 대한 기재를 제한하거나 일부만 기재하는 것이 방법이 될 수 있다. 넷째, 개인정보 보호 강화를 위해 필요한 조치는 무엇인가? 기존 원칙을 준수하고, 소송기록 열람 및 공개에 관한 원칙을 통일할 필요가 있다. 즉 열람 및 공개의 대상이 되는 소송기록의 경우 원칙적으로 개인정보 보호처리를 하도록 할 필요가 있고, 민사소송법상 그 근거를 명시적으로 밝힐 필요가 있다. 주민등록번호의 경우 개인정보 보호의 관점에서는 수집 자체를 제한하는 것이 합리적이지만, 법원이 절차 진행을 위해 주민등록번호를 수집한 경우 기재는 대체번호를 사용하여 노출을 차단하는 것이 필요하다. With the entry into the digital society, various personal information is used in electronic form, and as social network services are widely used throughout society, the possibility of personal information exposure has dramatically increased. As a result, the damage caused by personal information exposure is increasing, and the demand for personal information protection is continuously increasing. Although exposure of personal information does not always lead to damage, the problem is that exposure itself has potential for damage. Such exposure of personal information is also a problem in the civil procedure based on the principle of public. Accordingly, this paper summarizes and reviews the legal basis for the collection and description of personal information in civil procedure and the related status, and then summarizes the improvement measures as follows. First, is it necessary to collect personal information by the court in the civil procedure? The court needs to collect personal information for jurisdiction, party identification, and service. There is no problem with the collection of personal information by the court because the court has legitimate legal authority and it is for public purposes for proceeding with the procedure. However, the problem is that personal information collected by the court has a possibility of being exposed as it is recorded in various litigation records. Therefore, it is necessary to limit the collection target and to strengthen the protection measures for the recorded personal information. Second, should the court always collect names, addresses, contact information, and social security numbers? Collecting all of these will help smooth proceedings in litigation, but all personal information is not always required, and personal information exposure itself is a problem, so it is reasonable to reduce the collection itself. This needs to start with observing the principles. In other words, it is reasonable to distinguish between essential and optional information based on civil procedure related laws and to guide them so that the parties can choose whether or not to include them. Third, what is the appropriate method for restricting the collection of personal information? Although collection restrictions are necessary from the point of view of personal information protection, the need for collection by the courts also has a reasonable basis, so unilateral restrictions are not appropriate. Therefore, it is necessary to start by partially restricting the collection of personal information in procedures where the need to collect personal information is small. Limiting the collection of addresses when both parties proceed with electronic litigation, and restricting or partially listing addresses when an attorney is appointed can be a method. Fourth, what measures are necessary to strengthen the protection of personal information? It is necessary to comply with the existing principles, and to unify the principles regarding the perusal and disclosure of litigation records. In other words, in the case of litigation records subject to perusal and disclosure, in principle, it is necessary to protect personal information, and it is necessary to explicitly state the basis under the civil procedure act. In the case of resident registration numbers, it is reasonable to limit the collection itself from the point of view of personal information protection. However, if the resident registration number is collected by the court to proceed with the procedure, it is necessary to block exposure by using an alternative number for the record.

Catechol-functionalized Polysiloxane for Underwater Adhesives

Dohoon LEE,Dong Soo HWANG 한국생물공학회 2021 한국생물공학회 학술대회 Vol.2021 No.4

Confocal off-axis optical system with freeform mirror, application to Photon Simulator (PhoSim)

Dohoon Kim,Sunwoo Lee,Jimin Han,Woojin Park,Soojong Pak,Jaewon Yoo,Jongwan Ko,Dae-Hee Lee,Seunghyuk Chang,Geon-Hee Kim,David Valls-Gabaud,Daewook Kim 한국천문학회 2021 天文學會報 Vol.46 No.2

Developing dental adhesive containing catechol and thiolic compound for mimicking mussel adhesive protein

Dohoon LEE,Dongsoo HWANG 한국생물공학회 2016 한국생물공학회 학술대회 Vol.2016 No.4

드롭랜딩 동작 시 다운증후군 아동들의 수직 강성과 하지 운동학적 특성

( Dohoon Koo ),( Hyokju Maeng ),( Jonghyun Yang ) 한국운동역학회 2019 한국운동역학회지 Vol.29 No.3

Objective: Ligament laxity and hypotonia are characteristics of Down syndrome patients. The aim of this study was to compare the landing pattern between Down syndrome patients and typically developing subjects. To compare the landing pattern, variables related to ligament laxity and hypotonia i.e. vertical stiffness and lower extremities kinematics were investigated. Method: Five subjects with Down syndrome (age: 14.6±1.8 years, mass: 47.6±6.94 kg, height: 147.9±6.0 cm) and six able-bodied subjects (age: 13.2±0.4 years, mass: 54.7±6.7 kg, height: 160.1±9.8 cm) participated in this study. Results: The vertical displacement of the center of mass, vertical reaction force, leg stiffness and range of ankle angle range among Down syndrome patients were significantly different than typically developing group. The youth with Down's syndrome appeared to receive greater vertical impact force at landing than normal youth. Conclusion: The differences in the biomechanical characteristics suggest the delay in motor development among Down syndrome patients and an increased risk of injury to the lower extremity during movement execution such as drop landing.

경영과학교육 현황진단

Dohoon Kim 한국경영과학회 2018 한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.2018 No.10

Comparative Study Between Watson for Oncology and Tumor Boards for Treatment in Breast Cancer

Dohoon Kim,Ah Rem Jung,Joung Won Na,Yun Yeong Kim,Hee Kyung Ahn,Ki Hoon Sung,Min Ji Hong,Eun Young Yoo,Sang Yu Nam,Kyu Chan Lee,Eun Kyung Cho,Hye Young Choi,Heung Kyu Park,Yong Soon Chun 대한외과학회 2018 대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집 Vol.2018 No.11

A comparative study of Watson for Oncology and tumor boards in breast cancer treatment

Dohoon Kim,Yun Young Kim,Joon-Hyop Lee,Yoo Seung Chung,Sangtae Choi,강진모,Heung Kyu Park,Yong Soon Chun 대한종양외과학회 2019 Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol.15 No.1

Purpose: Watson for Oncology (WFO) is a computing system for considering treatment option with patients. The aim of this study is to determine the concordance rate of WFO and tumor board in treatment options of breast cancer. Methods: One hundred and seventy breast cancer patients who were treated at Gachon University Gil Medical Center (GMC) from December 2016 to March 2018 were investigated. “Concordance” is defined that treatment provided by GMC tumor board and WFO-provided treatments (Recommend or For Consideration) were coincide. “Discordance” is defined that treatment provided by GMC tumor board and WFO-provided treatments (Not Recommended or Not Available) were coincide. Results: In chemotherapy, of the total 170 patients, 23 patients were excluded, and the concordance rate was compared in 147 patients. Concordance rate was 93% (136/147). In the 11 patients who were discordant, seven patients complied with the treatment proposed by GMC tumor board due to insurance problems and age, and two patients did not follow the treatment proposed by WFO due to pregnancy and patient’s choice, and one patient chose a treatment determined by WFO, last one patient was not treated with chemotherapy because it was not considered to be clinically necessary. In radiotherapy, the overall agreement rate was as high as 99% (147/148). Conclusion: Through this study, we found that many of the treatment proposals provided by WFO are highly reliable. Although the overall agreement is high in the radiotherapy regimen, the indication for radiotherapy by WFO is more aggressive and hypofractionated high dose intensity radiotherapy is growing trend by WFO.

Parenting, Children’s Socioemotional Behavior, and Academic Achievement

Dohoon Lee,Amy Hsin 한국사회학회 2018 한국사회학회 심포지움 논문집 Vol.2018 No.5