미국의 조세소송상 화해제도

김상찬(Kim, Sang Chan) 성균관대학교 법학연구소 2009 성균관법학 Vol.21 No.3

Administrative Court or civil court deals with the litigation related to tax because South Korea is not set up a tax court, but the present tax relief system has proved its own limitation as the number of tax conflict is increasing and its details are getting various and complicated. If a dispute arises between a taxpayer and a person who has taxation, we do not have any system which can solve through reconciliation and mediation between the two parties. So the most fundamental problem is most tax conflicts are solved uniformly though ruling and administrative judge. This thesis introduces the actual condition of tax litigation on the United States's federal tax solving most tax conflicts and analyzes its background. the characteristic of solving system for the United States's tax conflict is not based on the appeal proceeding in administrative judge as a run-up to tax litigation, and instead, it is devising various ADR ways as well as reconciliation which solves conflicts through dialogue and compromise. The thesis explains that about 0.8% of tax conflicts in United States is solved promptly through reconciliation such as informal conference between the taxpayer and IRS and the fact of being solved by reconciliation in all cases from tax audit to lawsuit citing statistical data. In the case of tax conflict in South Korea, reconciliation is nearly used, and the thesis insists that must introduce ADR system such as reconciliation can solve disputes of settling the case out of court as well as prompt and economical, from taxpayer's remedy point of view. Therefore, this thesis will be a very valuable research material in examining the chance of reconciliation on tax conflict in South Korea from now on.

不勳産去來事故의 防止方案에 관한 硏究

金相明(Kim Sang-Myeong),金祥燦(Kim Sang-Chan) 한국법학회 2005 법학연구 Vol.18 No.-

It is true that incidents which happen within real estate transactions nowadays have become various and bigger in scale. These kinds of real estate transactional incidents have emerged as a social issue whereby the losses incurred as a result of a real estate transaction incident is not only an individual property loss but a psychological loss as well in its adroitness of scale or method. Furthermore, once a real estate transaction incident occurs, there is a problem in that it is impossible to recover the original state or that the damage is excessive. Therefore, the outcry for the necessity of seeking out a legislative and policy measure which will prevent this happening on a national level has been raised. However, in the present state of the national law, in the event of a real estate transactional incident, the problem lies in that there is no preventive measure for this kind of event, only a criminal punishment ex post facto. Therefore, the following legislative and policy measures which might prevent such incidents before its actual occurrence in the real estate transactions are suggested. First, a claiming ground insurance system which will preserve the true rightful person's loss as well as the changes in the social conditions should be introduced in Korea as well. The public servant working at the real estate registration office should be endowed with a substantial power of inspection so that there is further support in the real estate registration system. Further efforts should be made to prevent any real estate transaction incidents beforehand by endowing the power of public confidence under the agreement of the people to the real estate registration. Second, the registration department and the account department should be unified so that it may be supervised and inspected uniformly. The real estate rights analysis system should be officialized so that real estate transaction incidents may be prevented beforehand by introducing a real estate transaction execution guarantee system regarding the bill of sales through an appropriate legislation that is realistic. Third, in introducing the real estate rights analyst system, it is advisable to carry it out as an individual legislative form and it is reasonable to assume that it is the best possible alternative which will prevent real estate transaction incidents but it should be noted that it is low in effectiveness. As mentioned earlier, many obstacles are foreseen in order to make the real estate rights analysis system into an official system. Most importantly, in order to introduce the notarization system to the real estate rights analyst, there is a need to first establish the relationship with the middlemen about the boundaries of business dealings as well as the rights and duties according to the real estate brokerage law, and with the judicial scrivener about the boundaries of business dealings as well as the rights and duties according to the laws of judicial law.

국제중재절차에서 고려해야 할 중요한 요소

김상찬(Kim, Sang Chan),김유정(Kim Yu Jung) 국민대학교 법학연구소 2014 법학논총 Vol.27 No.1

교통통신수단의 발달로 인하여 국제거래나 국제투자가 활발해지고 있으며, 이에 따른 분쟁도 갈수록 증가하고 있다. 국제거래나 국제투자를 하는 기업의 입장에서는 분쟁을 해결하는데 있어서 상대국의 법원에서 해결하는 것보다는 국제중재를 원하는 것이 일반적이다. 그 이유는 여러가지가 있겠지만, 재판에 의하는 것보다 중애에 의하는 것이 공정성, 중립성이 보장될 뿐 아니라, 뉴욕협약 가입국 간에는 외국에서 내린 중재판정의 승인과 집행이 쉽기 때문이라고 할 수 있다. 분쟁을 중재로 해결하려는 기업은 국제거래나 국제투자 계약서상에 중재조항을 넣는 것부터 시작해서 실제로 분쟁이 발생되어 중재로 나아갈 때, 기업은 상대방과 합의를 통하여 국제중재 절차를 tailor made해 나가야 한다. 본고는 이렇게 상대방과 합의하면서 중재절차를 만들어나가는 과정에서 고려해야 할 요소 중에서 가장 중요하다고 생각되는 ① 중재기관 선택, ② 중재지 선택, ③ 중재인 선정, ④ 중재대리인 선임, ⑤ 문서제출시 유의사항 등에 대하여 고찰하고 있다. 이 요소들이 어떻게 정하는가에 따라서 중재의 승패가 달라질 수 있으므로 기업의 입장에서는 매우 중요하다고 할 수 있다. 한편, 국제중재 이용자는 우리 기업뿐만 있는 것이 아니라 해외의 기업이나 중재인들도 있다. 그러므로 국가적 입장에서도 보다 나은 중재 서비스를 제공하기 위한 인프라를 구축함으로써 우리나라가 세계의 중재시장에서 중재지로서의 위상을 높이는 것은 매우 중요한 과제라 할 것이다. 그러므로 정부나 대한상사중재원의 입장에서도 위의 요소들은 매우 중요하다고 할 것이다. In step with advancement of today’s transportation and communication, international transactions or international investments become more activated and at the same time the disputes arising therefrom continue to increase ever more. As for a company involved in international transactions or international investments, it is normal to seek a settlement through international arbitration rather than through courts in counterpart’s country. Though there may be a number of reasons for that, it is mainly because settlement by arbitration not only guarantees fairness and neutrality, also recognition and execution of arbitral awards made at a foreign country can be conducted easily between member countries of New York Convention. Any company which seeks to settle the dispute by arbitration should get international arbitration procedure tailor-made; From incorporation of arbitration clauses on contracts of an international transaction or international investment to agreement with the counterparts while any dispute develops to arbitration. This article examines presumably the most important factors over the course of the company’s agreement with the counterpart and proceeding arbitration as such. They include ① Selection of an arbitration institution ② Selection of a place of arbitration ③ Selection of an arbitrator ④ Appointment of an arbitration agent ⑤ Noteworthy matters to be considered at the time of document submission. These factors, which may determine success or failure of the arbitration, must be very crucial to the related company. On the other hand, apart from our country’s businesses, foreign businesses or arbitrators also can use international arbitration. Therefore, it must be a very significant task for our country to establish infra to offer better arbitration services from the national point of view and enhance our status as a place of arbitration in the global arbitration market. Thus, the above factors can also be very significant to the government or KCAB (Korean Commercial arbitration Board).

우리나라 온라인 ADR제도의 활성화방안에 관한 연구

김상찬 ( Kim Sang Chan ) 법조협회 2017 法曹 Vol.66 No.6

온라인 ADR은 ADR에 온라인 기술을 접목시킨 것으로서, 거리ㆍ시간ㆍ비용의 문제 등을 해소할 수 있기 때문에 소규모 소비자분쟁이나 국제상거래 분쟁해결에 매우 유용하다. 그래서 미국 등 선진국은 물론, OECD, ICC, WIPO 등 국제기구도 1990년대부터 온라인 ADR에 관하여 계속 논의해 왔으며, EU의 경우 2013년 온라인 ADR에 관한 입법과 2016년 EU플렛폼 설치를 통하여 31개국 258개 ADR기관을 연계시켜 온라인 ADR서비스를 행하고 있다. UNCITRAL도 2016년 7월 ‘ODR 기술지침’을 마련하고 있는 바, 향후 온라인 ADR에 관한 국제적 기준이 될 것으로 생각된다. 우리나라에서는 아직 온라인 ADR에 관한 기본법은 없고, 전자문서 및 전자거래기본법, 전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한 법률, 행정심판법 등 개별법에 온라인 ADR관련 규정이 산재하고 있을 뿐이며, 소비자분쟁조정위원회, 전자거래분쟁조정위원회, 콘텐츠분쟁조정위원회 등 ADR기관에서 온라인 ADR서비스를 제공하고 있지만, 국내의 ADR기관 대부분은 온라인 상담이나 접수만을 온라인으로 하는 정도의 초보적 단계에 머무르고 있다. 이 논문은 국내외의 온라인 ADR제도의 동향을 살펴본 후 이를 바탕으로 우리나라 온라인 ADR제도의 활성화방안을 다음과 같이 제시하고 있다. 첫째, UNICTRAL의 ‘ODR에 관한 기술지침’을 바탕으로 온라인 ADR에 관한 법규범을 체계화해야 한다. 둘째, 온라인 ADR기관에 대한 인증제도의 도입, 보안성, 안정성 등 기술적 문제 해결, 다양한 ADR절차 마련, 다양한 언어서비스 제공, 온라인 ADR 전문가의 양성 등을 통하여 온라인 ADR 서비스를 제공하는 ADR기관과 그 시스템의 신뢰를 제고시켜야 한다. 셋째, ‘ADR종합지원센터’를 설립하여 온라인 ADR기관의 인증, 감독, 지원업무를 수행하도록 해야 하며, 이 센터에서는 EU의 ‘ODR 플랫폼’과 같은 온라인 분쟁해결 포털을 만들고 이를 통하여 국내의 모든 개별 ADR기관들과 연결하여 당사자들이 쉽게 개별 ADR기관에 접근할 수 있고 자신의 분쟁해결에 적합한 기관을 선택할 수 있도록 해야 한다. Online ADR combines online technology with ADR, which can be used to solve small-scale consumer disputes or international commercial disputes because it can solve the problems of distance, time, and cost. Therefore, international organizations such as the OECD, ICC, WIPO as well as developed countries such as the United States have been discussing online ADR since the 1990s. In the case of EU, online ADR service is provided by linking 258 ADR institutions in 31 countries through legislation on the online ADR in 2013 and installation of EU platform in 2016. UNCITRAL is also preparing the ‘Technical Notes on Online Dispute Resolution’ in July 2016, and these Technical Notes is expected to become an international standard for online ADR in the future. There is no basic law on online ADR in Korea yet. Online ADR regulations are in place only in the electronic document and electronic transaction basic law, the consumer protection law in E-commerce, and administrative litigation law, etc. ADR services are provided by ADR institutions such as the Consumer Dispute Resolution Committee, the Electronic Transaction Dispute Resolution Committee, and the Contents Dispute Resolution Committee. However, most of the Korean ADR agencies are at the early stage of online consultation and receiving only online. This paper suggests the ways to activate online ADR system in Korea based on the trends of online ADR system at home and abroad. First, based on the Technical Notes on ODR by UNICTRAL, we must systemize the laws on online ADR. Second, the trust in ADR institutions that provide online ADR services and their systems should be strengthened by introducing certification system for online ADR institutions, solving technical problems such as security and stability, preparing various ADR procedures, providing various language services, and training online ADR experts. Third, the ADR Comprehensive Support Center should be established to carry out certification, supervision and support of online ADR institutions. This Center needs to create online dispute resolution portals such as the EU’s ODR platform, through this, it is possible to connect with all the individual ADR agencies in Korea so that the parties can easily access the individual ADR agencies and be able to choose the right institution for your dispute resolution.

논문(論文) : 한의학회지의 처방명 로마자 표기에 관한 고찰

김상찬 ( Sang Chan Kim ),변성희 ( Sung Hui Byun ),오성윤 ( Sung Yun Oh ),이병욱 ( Byung Wook Lee ) 대한한의학원전학회 ( 구 대한원전의사학회 ) 2006 대한한의학원전학회지 Vol.19 No.3

일본법상 요양간호업무의 법적 책임

김상찬(Kim Sang-Chan) 한국법학회 2006 법학연구 Vol.23 No.-

오늘날 의료에서 간호가 차지하는 영역이 넓고 역할 또한 커서 간호의 질이 곧 의료의 질을 좌우한다고 할 수 있으며, 간호업무의 작은 실수가 큰 의료사고를 일으키는 경우도 적지 않다. 이러한 사고가 생기지 않도록 간호업무상 주의의무를 다하도록 하고, 그 방지책을 강구하는 것은 물론 사고가 일어난 경우에는 정의와 형평의 원칙에 따라 법률적으로 타당한 해결을 도모해야 한다. 이러한 관점에서 간호사고를 둘러싼 법률문제를 명확하게 할 필요가 있다. 그러나 우리나라에서 이 문제에 초점을 맞춘 연구는 아직 적으며, 특히 간호사고 판례를 종합적으로 연구한 문헌은 거의 찾아볼 수 없다. 따라서 본고는 우리나라와 유사한 법제를 가지고 있는 일본의 간호사고 판례를 분석하여 이에 관한 법률문제를 명확하게 하려고 한다. 간호업무는 크게 '요양상의 간호'와 '진료의 보조'로 구분할 수 있으며, 간호사고 에 대한 법률문제를 분석ㆍ정리하려면 이 두 가지를 모두 살펴보아야 하지만, 본고에서는 우선 요양간호 업무Ub 한정하여 살펴보려 한다. 본고의 내용을 개관하면 다음과 같다. 우선, 요양간호의 의의를 검토한다. 이를 위하여 일본에서의 간호업무의 법제화 및 그 연혁을 개관하고, 간호업무의 내용이 어떻게 규정되고, 어떻게 변화하여 왔는가를 살핀다. 둘째로, 의사의 지휘감독 아래서 행하는 진료보조 업무에 비하여, 간호사의 주체성 내지 독자성을 가지고 있는 요양간호 업무에서, 의사의 지시와 간호사의 업무행위와의 관계를 어떻게 할 것인가에 대하여 일본의 학설과 판례의 입장을 살펴보려 한다. 셋째로, 일본에서의 요양간호에 관한 판례를 요양지도, 경과관찰, 의사와의 연락, 환경관리, 환자관리 등의 제 유형으로 분류하여 각 유형마다 그 업무에 요구되는 주된 주의의무를 구체적 사안에 따라 분석하여 요양간호업무에 요구되는 주의의무와 법적 책임을 규명 하고자 한다. 본고는 향후 우리나라의 간호업무, 특히 요양간호 업무에서의 주의의무의 기준 마련과 간호사고의 법적 책임을 명확히 하는데 도움을 주게 될 것이다. In today's medical care, the area occupied by nursing is so far-reaching and its role so expansive which could make it possible for us to say that nursing directly controls the quality of medical care. Subsequently, there are many cases where there are major medical incidents due to minor mistakes made under the name of nursing. Not only should people responsible for nursing be attentive to their duties as well as coming up with measures to prevent such happenings, they should promote an appropriate legal resolution based on principles of justice and fairness in the event of any medical incidents. Viewed in this perspective, there is a need to make it perfectly clear all legal issues surrounding this field. Nursing duties can mainly be classified into two large categories which are 'nursing for convalescence' and 'assistance in medical treatments', In order to analyze and organize the legal issues related to nursing incidents, both areas need to be looked into but in this paper, in the interest of time and scope of the paper, it first tries to look into the area of convalescence nursing duties. The outline of the paper is as follows. First, the significance of convalescence nursing is looked into. In order to do this, the history as well as the legalization of nursing duties in Japan is enumerated, then how the contents of the nursing duties were stipulated, and how it has been changed. Secondly, in the convalescence nursing which has a certain amount of autonomy on the part of the nurse compared to the medical treatment assistance duties carried out under the doctor's supervision, it attempts to organize the stance of the hypotheses and cases regarding on what to do in the relationship between the doctor's direction and the independent actions taken by the nurses during their work. Thirdly, the case studies regarding convalescence nursing are classified into convalescence guidance, observation of the progress, communicating with the doctor, environment management and patient management. Each case studies are categorized into their own unique type so that they can be analyzed according to their specific nature which is required by each job specification. At the same time, while considering its relationship with Liabilities in other types of duties, it attempts to investigate the legal Liabilities and special duties required in the convalescence nursing, It is hoped that this paper would assist in legal matters concerning nursing duties in Korea especially in the preparation of the standards in the special duties in convalescence nursing and clarifying the legal liabilities in nursing incidents in the future.

엔터테인먼트분쟁 해결을 위한 중재제도의 활성화 방안

김상찬(Sang-Chan Kim) 한국중재학회 2013 중재연구 Vol.23 No.1

The entertainment industry has developed along with current Korean wave fever, and so entertainment-related disputes are increasing rapidly. Litigation is a poor fit for entertainment disputes because of characteristics such as temporal sensitivity. Thus, in the US, the entertainment industry resolves these disputes through ADR mechanisms like arbitration, but cases of settling such disputes through arbitrations are very rare in Korea. This study examined the characteristics and types of entertainment disputes and considered the compatibility of arbitration as a method for settling disputes, and then suggested tasks for revitalizing arbitration systems as entertainment dispute resolution procedures. Arbitrations have many merits, such as the rapid pace of procedures, confidentiality, satisfying the long-term desires of business relationships, the low cost of settling disputes, judgments rendered by experts, etc.; thus, it is a very suitable mechanism to settle entertainment-related disputes. The study proposes necessary steps for revitalizing arbitration systems for entertainment disputes. First, awareness of entertainment industry workers about the arbitration system should be raised. Second, special educational programs for members the of Korean Commercial Arbitration Board related to entertainment should be set up and operated together with encouraging positive attitudes toward actions like establishing a dedicated arbitration unit on entertainment disputes. Third, neutral, professional arbitrators should be secured and aggressive disclosures made. Fourth, a professional ADR organization such as an Entertainment Arbitration Committee should be established.

고율의 이자약정과 반사회성에 관한 연구

김상찬(Kim Sang-Chan),이충은(Lee Choong-Eun) 한국법학회 2008 법학연구 Vol.32 No.-

우리나라는 1962년 구 이자제한법이 제정·시행되었지만, 1997년 IMF를 맞이하면서 구제금융을 받는 과정에서 고금리정책의 일환으로 1998년 구 이자제한법이 폐지되었다. 이후 대부업법이 제정되었지만, 구 이자제한법이 폐지되고 대부업법이 제정되기 전까지 약 5년간 이자제한제도가 전혀 시행되지 않아 금융시장에서 퇴출된 신용이 불량한 서민들과 중소기업들이 사채시장으로 몰리게 되었다. 이와 같이 특별법에 의하여 고율의 이자를 제한하는 규정이 없는 경우 민법의 일반조항인 민법 제103조 및 제104조에 의하여 규제를 할 수 있는지가 문제된다. 대법원은 민법 제103조를 적용하여 제한초과이자를 무효라고 판시하고 있다. 또한 임의로 지급된 고율의 이자의 반환청구에 대하여 민법 제746조 단서를 적용하여 반환청구를 인정한다. 채권자 및 채무자 모두를 보호하게 된다는 점에서는 매우 바람직한 판단이다. 2007. 3. 29. 다시 이자제한법이 제정되어 같은 해 6. 30.부터 시행됨으로써 고율의 이자 문제는 입법적으로 해결되기는 하였으나, 이러한 특별법이 상황에 따라 폐지될 수 있다고 전제하며 고율의 이자약정을 반사회성의 법리로서 해결하는 문제는 매우 중요할 수 있다. 이 논문에서는 이자제한에 관한 주요국가의 입법례와 더불어 고융의 이자약정에 관하여 반사회성의 법리에 관하여 살펴보고 있다. The old interest restriction law in Korea was established in 1962 and was enforced. But the period of IMF in 1997, from the process which receives a relief loan, the old interest restriction law was abolished as part of higher interest policy at 1998. The loan business law was established after that, but the old interest restriction law is abolished and before being established the loan business law, the interest restrictive system is not entirely enforced for about 5 years, and for bad credits, the people and small and medium enterprises that are expelled from the financial money market are driven into a private money market. Like this, according to the special law, in case of no regulation which restricts the interest of high rate by Art.103 and Art.104 of the civil law, the possibility of that would be an issue. The Supreme Court decide that excess interest limit is null and void by Art.103 of the civil law. Also it presumes a claim for recapture of high interest rate which is provided discretion by applying Art.746 of the civil law. The creditor and the debtor all are under protection, and I think that it is very desirable. The interest restriction law was established again in 2007 March 29th ,and from 2007 June 30th was enforced, and the interest problem of high rate was solved legislatively, however, depending on the abolishment of the special law, the problem which solves contracted high interest rates as a principle of law on anti-sociality is very important. Therefore, this thesis searches for major national cases legislation as well as high interest rate agreement as a principle of law on anti-sociality.

보증인 보호를 위한 특별법의 문제점과 개선방안

김상찬(Kim Sang-Chan),이충은(Lee Choong-Eun) 한국법학회 2009 법학연구 Vol.34 No.-

우리나라는 국민들의 정서와 사회풍토가 정의에 약하여 가족간, 직장 동료 및 친구 등 잘 아는 사람들의 보증 요청에 이를 거절하지 못하여 아무런 대가없이 보증을 서는 경우가 많았다. 이로 인해 보증인은 자신이 부담하여야 할 광범위한 채무를 인식하지 못하고 주채무자가 채무를 이행하지 않을 경우 주채무자의 책임을 전적으로 부담하게 되는 경우가 발생하였다. 특히 우리나라는 IMF를 겪음으로 부실채권이 증가하였고, 이로 인해 연대보증인들의 피해가 속출하였다. 이에 정부는 보증인 보호를 위한 특별법을 제정하여 시행하게 되었다. 동법의 시행으로 아무런 대가 없이 호의로 이루어지는 보증으로 인한 보증인의 경제적ㆍ정신적 피해를 방지하고, 금전채무에 대한 합리적인 보증계약 관행을 확립함으로써 신용사회 정착에 이바지하게 되었다. 그러나 동법은 보증인을 보호하고자 하는 목적을 달성하는데 몇 가지 미흡한 부분이 존재한다. 예를 들어 입법방식에 있어서의 문제점, 실효성의 문제점 등이 대표적이다. 이 논문은 현재 시행중인 보증인 보호에 관한 특별법의 주요내용을 살펴보고, 그 문제점과 개선방안을 살펴보고 있다. There are many cases which stand surety without any price not denying their guarantee request by people who know well such as the family, the co-worker and friend etc. in South Korea because citizens are sentimental and the social trend is weak in justice. There was a case which cover the principal's responsibility entirely if a guarantor does not recognize the wide range of debt which must cover in person, and if a principal discharge his or her obligations. Especially, in South Korea with undergoing IMF, the bad debt increased, and joint sureties' damage also occurred in succession. The government enforced and established the special law for a guarantor protection. By enforcing the special law, it prevents a guarantor's financial and mental damage for a guarantee made without any price as a favor and contributes to settlement of a credit society by establishing rational a contract of suretyship constitution of debts. However, the special law leave something to be desired to accomplish its purpose to protect a guarantor. For example, the problem on a legislation method and the problem of effectiveness are a case in point. This thesis looks into the brief summaries of a special law for a guarantor protection on now being in force.

가사분쟁에 있어서 중재절차 활성화 방안

김상찬(Kim, Sang-Chan) 한국법학회 2013 법학연구 Vol.49 No.-

우리나라의 가사분쟁의 해결은 주로 1990년 제정된 가사소송법에 의하여 가정법원에서 해결하고 하도록 하고 있다. 가사소송법은 가사소송 사건 중 나류 및 다류사건과 가사비송사건 중 마류사건에 대하여는 조정전치주의에 의하여 조정을 거치도록 하고 있다. 요컨대 우리나라의 가사소송법에 의하면 가사분쟁은 소송이나 조정을 통하여 해결할 수 있을 뿐이고 중재를 통하여 해결하도록 하는 규정은 없다. 한편, 우리 중재법은 ‘사법상의 분쟁을 적정·공평·신속하게 해결함’을 목적으로 하고 있어, 가사분쟁을 중재로 해결할 가능성은 있다. 그러나 중재는 주로 상사계약, 해상관련계약, 건설계약, 노동분쟁, 국제거래사건 등에 한정하여 이용되어 왔으며, 가사분쟁에 있어서는 중재가 거의 활용되지 않고 있었으며, 이런 이유로 가사중재를 다룬 논문도 별로 없다. 이 논문은 우선, 중재가능성의 개념, 중재가능성에 관한 학설과 입법례, 그리고 가사분쟁의 중재가능성에 관하여 살피고 있다. 그 다음에 가사중재가 비교적 잘 발달되어 있는 미국의 가사중재에 관하여 개관하고, 마지막으로 우리나라의 가사중재 활성화방안을 제시하고 있다. 이 논문에서 제시하는 활성화 방안으로는, 가사중재법 제정, 가사 중재기구의 설립, 전문적 중재인 양성, 법원과의 연계, 가사중재의 홍보와 국가의 지원 등을 들고 있다. Family disputes in our country are mostly being resolved at Family Court in accordance with the Family Litigation Act that was enacted in 1990. The Family Litigation Act mandates conciliation in accordance with conciliation-prepositive principle for A type & C type cases of family litigation and for E type case of non-litigious family cases. According to the Family Litigation Act of our country, family disputes can be resolved only through litigation or conciliation and there are no regulations for resolution through arbitration. Meanwhile, there is a possibility that family disputes can beresolved through arbitration since the purpose of our Arbitration Law is to ‘reasonably, fairly and swiftly resolve judicial disputes’. However, arbitration has been limitedly used mostly for commercial contract, maritime contract, construction contract, labor dispute, international trade case, etc. and arbitration has hardly been utilized in family disputes. For such reason, there are hardly any thesis on family arbitration. This thesis reviews, first of all, the concept of arbitration possibility, theories & legislation cases on possibility of arbitration and the possibility of arbitration for family dispute. Next, it briefly reviewed the family arbitration in the US with relatively well advanced family arbitration. Lastly, it presents ways to revitalize family arbitration in our country, which include the enactment of family arbitration act, establishment of family arbitration agency, cultivation of expert arbitrators, connection with court, promotion of family arbitration and the national support.