증거방법으로서 영상녹화물 활용 방안 연구

천진호(Chun Jin-Ho) 동아대학교 법학연구소 2011 東亞法學 Vol.- No.52

본 연구에서는 2010.12.20. 법무부가 수사과정에서 작성된 영상녹화물을 독자적인 증거방법으로 인정하는 내용을 담아 입법예고한 「형사소송법 일부개정법률안」에 대한 비판적 관점에서 먼저 수사과정 영상녹화의 형사소송법적 의미를 살펴보고(Ⅱ), 수사과정 영상녹화의 유형과 영상녹화물의 진정성 확보방안(Ⅲ)과 진술증거로서 영상녹화물의 증거능력(Ⅳ)에 대해 고찰한 것으로, 전문증거에 해당하는 검사 작성의 피의자신문조서의 증거능력과 관련하여 그 예외의 길을 열고자 하는 접근은 어떠튼 수사과정에서 수집하는 피의자 또는 참고인의 진술을 실체 판단의 유력한 증거로 사용하고자 하는 인식에서 출발하고 있다고 보여진다. 공판중심주의의 실천적 의미는 법정이라는 장소를 중시하여 법정에서 사건의 실체 파악에 필요한 자료와 정보를 현출하고, 검사와 피고인 그리고 변호인이 모두 출석하여 추장과 입을 하는 공간인 법정에서 나타난 정보를 중심으로 당사자의 변론과 추가입증 및 반증이 이루어져야 하며, 사실판단자는 법정 외에서 얻은 정보를 자신의 판단자료로 삼아서는 안된다는 점이다. 공개된 법정에서 구두에 의하여 변론을 행할 때에만 법관은 공판정에서의 심리를 통하여 심증을 얻을 수 있고, 공판정에서 반대심문의 기회를 주면서 직접 조사한 증거에 의하여 심증을 형성하여야 법관은 정확한 심증을 얻을 수 있고, 피고인도 변명의 기회를 가질 수 있기 때문이다. 이러한 공판중심주의를 전제로 하여 공판절차에서는 피고인을 보호하기 위한 기본원칙이 의미를 가질 수 있게 되며, 정의와 법적 안정성 및 비례성의 원칙이라는 법치국가원리의 내재적 본질요소가 실현될 수 있게 된다. 지금까지 형사재판의 모습은 공판정에서 이루어지는 진술의 구체적 내용을 들어보려는 노력보다는 수사기관 작성의 조서와 공판정에서의 진술 내용이 왜 틀리는 지를 추궁하는데 주력하거나, 새로운 주장이 나온 경우 새로운 주장의 허위 여부를 판단하는데 주력하고 있었다는 비판을 면할 수 없다. 원칙을 벗어난 왜곡된 수사관행과 공판중심주의에 충실한 형사재판의 모습을 제자리로 돌려놓기 위해서는 형사사법체계의 패러다임을 전면적으로 수정할 필요가 있다는 점에서 검사 또는 사법경찰관이 작성한 피고인 또는 피고인 아닌 자의 진술을 내용으로 하는 영상녹화물도 조서에 준하여 증거능력을 인정하는 내용을 담은 법무부의 ?형사소송법 일부개정법률안?은 재검토되어야 한다. The current Criminal Procedure Code the recording system which records the investigation process of the criminal must interpret protocol of examination that will not be able to substitute. In compliance with the Criminal Procedure Code illegal to video tape the statement features and a contents of the criminal, admissibility of evidence will not be able to recognize because is an evidence which is collected. But the legal practical affairs and to between scholars was visible a different view about visual recording evidence value. but Amends several times Criminal Procedure Code and under using visual recording, but the use is not becoming actually well. There is cause which is various with the reason where visual recording system which is introduced with difficult is not applied actively. Avoiding the opposition of the opinion which what is presented from discussion process and the shape which is negotiate and with the features which is strange drawing to do rather changing probably is not, there is a necessity which will look back. In order to apply with visual recording evidence amends the Criminal Procedure Code to be, the meaning which the visual recording system from criminal action and investigation about the opinion which is discussed. To understand the meaning which the visual recording system and to investigate the visual recording will be able to apply with evidence in order, must amend the Criminal Procedure Code.

제7회 한증 형법 국제 학술심포지움 : 국제형법의 국내적 수용에 관한 논의현황과 주요 내용

천진호 ( Jin Ho Chun ) 한국비교형사법학회 2009 비교형사법연구 Vol.11 No.2

Due to the impact of internationalization and globalization of foreign crimes is increasing. As a result, the field of criminal law that the state is expanding the scope of cooperation. The Republic of Korea`s economic growth since 1990 while human and material exchanges with foreign countries grew, the influence due to the Republic of Korea from committing a crime criminals fleeing abroad is also increasing. The phenomenon of the internationalization of crime while faster terrorism, drug trafficking, human trafficking and international organized crime has also increased. And foreign citizens from increased crime carried a sentence in a foreign country, as well as citizens serving in foreign countries was also increased, as a result, the state of criminal law the principle of substantial part of the correction was inevitable. For international crimes, International Criminal Law traditionally does not conflict with the sovereignty of foreign countries within the area of criminal law applicable to a range of prescribed laws and regulations of the Penal Code is the coverage of place. Today, however, the effect on the results of a foreign court, enforcement, transfer of foreign criminal procedure and criminal judicial cooperation, criminal jurisdiction, including information on international transport prisoners are being expanded. The international criminal court, depending on the expansion of Korea`s tendency to create Law of Treaty on Extradition and Criminal justice assistance law are implemented. The current July 2009, for criminal justice cooperation treaties with 26 countries was signed, a crime that can be transported into the country and 29 countries and signed treaties. And Romes Statute of the International Criminal Court, Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons CETS No.: 112 for a concrete realization, the International Criminal Court the jurisdiction to punish for criminal law and international transport prisoners and law enforcement is to establish. South Korea and China to increase exchanges between the real human situation, in March 2009 is currently detained in prison, the Republic of Korea, China National convicts 124 people, in May 2009 drafts are currently in prison in the Republic of Korea Chinese prisoners of 622 people, Therefore, the Republic of Korea is admitted to the prison of the Chinese, the most important foreign prisoners are accounted for. South Korea and China in the lively exchanges between the crimes committed by South Korea who was also raised to increase the possibility that prisoners will continue to grow as a result is expected. Prisoners housed in prisons in China are Korean language communication problems, such as treatment issues and are experiencing many difficulties in ensuring the basic rights. So, families of prisoners and prisoners in this area needs improvement, and for transporting prisoners and the results have a high interest in the treaty is being evaluated. Mongolia, South Korea by the practical need for these (Mongolia, 2007.5.28. Signed, August 23, 2008 effective) as second only to China, May 27, 2008 "Treaty between the Republic of Korea and the People`s Republic of China on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons" was signed. And July 6, 2009 Different countries has been confined to prison for convicts sentenced to the punishment of his country`s remaining period of the certificate in their home country to send the treaty were exchanged. The treaty for the rest of the prisoners by more than 1 year if they want the rest of the nation`s prison and was able to. The Treaty of August 5, 2009 Republic of Korea and China becoming effective extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance treaty criminal and civil judicial cooperation and mutual legal assistance treaties with all the major treaties have been effective. In this study, increasing phenomenon of international criminal justice cooperation in accordance with acceptable international criminal law on the domestic level and the main topics discussed extradition system, on the International Criminal Court Rome Statute, the international system and the prisoners transferred the contents of the relevant international conventions and examine the status of agreement. And Law of Treaty on Extradition, International Criminal Court jurisdiction over the crime rate on the penalty law, Convicts transported International Law look at some of the key information, and should.

불능미수범의 ‘결과발생 불가능’과 관련한 해석상의 문제점

천진호(Chun Jin-Ho) 동아대학교 법학연구소 2008 東亞法學 Vol.- No.42

Im Ergebnis soll die Entscheidung fur den untauglichen Versuch nicht von der Gefahrlichkeit als Strafgrund des Versuchs, sondern von dem Irrtum uber Mittel oder Objekt als Grund der Erfolglosigkeit abhanigig sein. Die heftige Diskussion um den Massstab fur die Gefahrlichkeit im untauglichen Versuch stammt aus der unkritischen Aufnahme der Lehre im Rahmen des Strafgrundes des Versuchs in Deutschland. Bei der Auslegung des untauglichen Versuchs(§ 27 kStGB) handelt es sich darum, die Bedeutung der Tatbestandsmerkmale ‘Unmoglichkeit der Deliktsvollendung’, ‘Irrtum uber Mittel oder Objekt’ und ‘Gefahrlichkeit der Handlung’ zu konkretisieren. Der Unterschied zwischen dem tauglichen und untauglichen Versuch zeigt sich also die Moglichkeit der tatbestandlichen Vollendung. Eine Diskution uber das gefahrliche untaugliche Versuch und die ungefahrliche Untauglichenvornahme ist nur moglich, wenn eine Tat die allgemeinen Tatbestande des Versuches erfuhlt. Danach die aberglaubischen Versuche oder irreale Versuche, wie z. B. mit dem Beten oder dem Zucker ein Mensch toten will, sollten in dieser Diskution ausgenommen werden, weil sie kein tatbestandlichen Vorsatz haben konnten. Und ‘Unmoglichkeit der Deliktsvollendung’ nicht bedeutet tatsachlichen und empirischen Begriff, sondern normativen Begriff. Man wird das Merkmal ‘Unmoglichkeit der Deliktsvollendung’ auf nomologische Zustande beschranken mussen, und nicht auf faktische ausdehnen durfen. Und es darf dabei hochstens eine abstrakte Gefahr fur das geschutzte Rechtsgut eingetreten sein. Nach dem Urteil eines einsichtigen Menschen, der sich in die Position des Taters vor der Tat versetzt, besteht diese normative Unmoglichkeit der Deliktsvollendung. Im Begriff ‘Irrtum uber Mittel oder Objekt’ konnen sowohl ontologische Irrtumer als auch nomologische Irrtumer umgefasst werden, und die Unmoglichkeit der Deliktsvollendung soll fachmannisch, namlich von demjenigen, der entsprechende fachmannische Erkenntnisse besitzt, festgelegt werden.

범죄피해자의 권리 확보방안

천진호(Chun, Jin-Ho) 한국피해자학회 2007 被害者學硏究 Vol.15 No.1

The human rights of the suspect and the accused very is important from criminal case process. It takes but also the human rights of the crime victim must be respected and it is and the righteous criminal case judicial system is possible. From like this viewpoint it began the legal position of the victim from criminal case process and the discussion regarding a victim protective necessity ! or a justifiability sprouted the whole long and it was proposed. Today the problem of 'victim protection', victim support' or the position reinforcement of the victim from criminal case administration of justice is rising with focus issue. This research first tries to observe the result of victim protection and the past which relates with a support. And the fact that from the current law it is guaranteed with right of the victim. Foundation it does like this fact, In order to strengthen the right of the crime victim it tries to search a new method. And from this research, in order to strengthen the right of the crime victim will present the legal ground. Also being various for the right reinforcement of the victim, it makes a policy and the ground which is necessary to an execution will make.

결과적 가중범과 중지미수

천진호(Chun Jin-Ho),조상제, 문채규 한국형사법학회 2006 刑事法硏究 Vol.26 No.-

경제범죄에 대한 정책적 대응방안

천진호 ( Jin Ho Chun ) 한국형사정책학회 2006 刑事政策 Vol.18 No.1

First of all, this study examines, in a policy way, a notion of crime related to a sphere of the economical crime that rises in change of an economical domain and then, compares with a traditional economical crime and new one. types of the economical crime rising all over the world, in terms of a present condition and a parallel aspect, are arranged by three category below. Type of crime that occurred in the managemental process, such as a monopoly and an unfair transaction, that make social-ills from unjust managements like offering money for political activities illegally and that cause the personal damage like a ruining people`s health with the indiscreet development. In the theoretical aspect, we analysis economical factors of the crime and examine factors individually with the social aspect. This paper shows to how this country and others are regulating the economical crime with an administrative way and a commercial law(Act) as well as criminal law and how they are letting their administrative organizations operate the political control and prevention, then what problems they have in upper process will be an important issue. As a countermeasure, Problems of legal and political regulation are analyzed in the next step. Especially, this chapter is completed a theoretical construction with the question about how legal restricts operate against the crime and an extent of the legal obligation of companies. Finally, this paper approach the crime with internal and external restricts as the central issue.

위법수집증거배제법칙의 실천적 과제

천진호(Chun Jin-Ho) 동아대학교 법학연구소 2009 東亞法學 Vol.- No.44

The 17th Criminal Procedure Code of Presidential Committee on Judicial Reform led and established an the exclusionary Rule of illegally obtained Evidence provision. But until which degree scope of non-statement evidence applying the exclusionary Rule of illegally obtained Evidence about there is a various opinion. Specially after being supreme court decision(2007), the discussion sharply about this part, is advanced. The starting point of this dissertation the statement evidence when exception applies the exclusionary Rule of illegally obtained Evidence without, non-statement evidence, the exclusionary Rule of illegally obtained Evidence strictly, was not applied is. Relates with the application of the exclusionary Rule of illegally obtained Evidence of non-statement evidence and the contents which the theory and judicial precedent are presenting is the fiction could not be materialized from fact. But the theory and judicial precedent faithfully in principle of the lawful process which is provided in constitution, must interpret the exclusionary Rule of illegally obtained Evidence is a thing. Under evidence collecting from process the process is violated conclusively in constitution and infringes the right of the defendant and to the case which influences to entity judgment of event is a statement evidence, or, is, exception without applies an illegal collection evidence exclusion law a non-statement evidence, or must do. And like this interpretation the fact that is faithful to the lawsuit ideology which is a guarantee of rights of lawful process principle and the defendant of constitution as a matter of means that will do.

국민참여재판에서 시각자료의 활용과 증거 허용성

천진호(Chun, Jin-Ho) 한국형사정책학회 2009 刑事政策 Vol.21 No.2

Civil participation criminal trial, the jury, the primary means of receiving information through visual language and is the only way The jury in order to persuade effectively and efficiently, such as the current parties to the proceeding of the language and our words will be changed Litigants, legal knowledge is not a jury trial rather than using the language and words 'seeing' through the data argue that the visual is much more effective Visual communication to communicate with another by comparing the effect that the extraordinarily high pass That visual images and audio and video media, combined with the character to appeal to multiple senses of vision or hearing, so that a single sensory appeal to the media much more specific and more efficient to transmit information These visual aids to the human perception of the complex because it affects the hearing to the media that print media and communication and hence higher efficiency Pleading by the multimedia in civil participating criminal trial that this principle should be In addition to hearing the jury throughout the trial, time to get the information efficiently and to keep the memory of that information can give helps In this paper, this time by starting citizen participation in the trial to highlight the importance of the concept of visual materials and visual effects, and some of those issues were rs wewed and how to pleading to convince the jury that the change of direction and visual materials will be used as scientific evidence of the depth was analyzed

피해자학 연구방법론

천진호(Chun, Jin-Ho) 한국피해자학회 1999 被害者學硏究 Vol.7 No.1

Victimology aims prevention or reduction of the victim of crimes as a positive and empirical, scientific research. Methodology contains the collection and analysis of exact data and objective facts, it means the rule or supplementary means for the achievement of study aims. Thus qualitative, analytical and normative studies as well as quantitative, experiential, and factual studies are very important methodologies in the studies of victimology. The latter example is victimization surveys, character of a victim and the former examples are role of a victim in a criminal act, interaction of a victim and criminal, legal status of a victim in the criminal justice process, public support and services for victims such as compensation programs in social welfare's level or restitution. In victimological inquiry there are several methodologies which are frequently used. They are analysis of official victim statistics, experimental research, participant observation, in-depth interview, group-interview, case study or life history study, sample group survey, follow-up investigation, self-report measures of a victim, the development of victim typologies. The utility of victimological research should have practical and socially useful applications for predicting, preventing, and for dealing with the effects of victim. One application stems from its attempt to ascertain the extent and nature of crime and victim. Another useful application of victimization survey research is the light that sheds on the disparity between actual and reported crime and victim rates by identifying what influences victim's decisions to report or not report. And victimization information has also stimulated restitution and victim compensation programs. Another example of the application of victimological research concerns the sentencing of criminal offenders, that is, sentencing schemes depend on assessments of relative participation and responsibility as well as characteristics of a victim and criminal. Also the victimological methodologies have an influence on the development and evaluation of public support and service programs for victims.

상소권회복제도의 몇 가지 문제점

천진호(Chun Jin Ho) 한국법학원 2007 저스티스 Vol.- No.97

상소권회복은 상소기간이 경과한 후에 법원의 결정으로 소멸한 상소권을 회복시키는 제도로, 형사소송법은 제345조 내지 제348조에 상소권회복에 관한 규정을 두고 있다. 즉 상소권자의 책임 없는 사유로 인하여 상소기간이 경과한 경우에도 상소권을 인정하지 않고 재판을 확정시키면 상소권자, 특히 피고인의 상소권을 부당하게 제약하는 결과로 된다. 이러한 경우에 법적 안정성보다 실체적 정의를 우선시켜 구체적 타당성을 고려하여 재판의 확정 자체가 당사자 특히 피고인의 이익을 부당하게 박탈하는 것을 구제하기 위한 제도가 상소권회복으로, 유죄의 확정판결에 중대한 사실오인이 있는 경우에 이를 시정하기 위하여 인정되는 비상구제절차로 형사 소송법 제420조 이하에서 규정하고 있는 재심 및 확정판결에 대하여 그 심판의 법령위반을 이유로 이를 시정하기 위하여 인정되는 비상구제절차로 형사소송법 제441조 이하에서 규정하고 있는 비상상고와 마찬가지로 일사부재리 효력의 적용을 배제하는 절차로 인정되고 있다. 최근 들어 사법개혁의 큰 틀에서 형사소송법 개정이 활발하게 연구ㆍ논의되었는데, 논의의 주된 내용들은 인신구속제도의 정비, 공판중심주의 및 이와 관련한 증거법 규정들, 그리고 형사사법절차의 간이ㆍ신속화 방안 등에 대한 것들로, 상소제도에 대해서는 고등법원에 상고부를 설치하는 방안과 같은 형사사법시스템 그 자체에 대한 논의에 머물고 있다. 특히 상소권회복제도에 대해서는 대부분의 문헌에서 관련 규정만을 소개하고 있는 정도에 그치고 있을 뿐, 이에 대한 심도있는 연구가 전무한 상태에 있다. 본고에서는 상소권회복제도와 관련하여 먼저 형사소송법 제345조 이하의 상소권회복과 소송 촉진 등에 관한 특례법 제23조의2에서 규정하고 있는 재심의 관련성 및 입법정비방안을 검토한 후, 2) 대표적인 상소권회복청구사유인 특례법 제23조 제1심공판의 특례 규정이 헌법상 보장된 재판청구권을 침해하는지와 함께 이에 대한 입법개정방안을 살펴보고, 3) 상소권회복청구와 집행정지를 규정하고 있는 형사소송법 제347조와 제348조가 헌법상 보장된 신속한 재판을 받을 권리를 침해하는지와 함께 입법개정방안을 검토하기로 한다. 4) 그리고 상소권회복제도와 관련하여 제348조 제1항이 규정하고 있는 필요적 재판집행정지 규정의 타당성에 대하여 살펴보고자 한다. The recovery of right to appeal after the appeal duration elapses, is the system which recovers the right to appeal which disappears with decision of the court of justice. The recovery of right to appeal is provided in the criminal procedure law(§345~§358). Against the right to appeal lapse the right to appeal own responsibility not recognizing the right to appeal even in nil the right to appeal it is unjust and it reaches the wave high price which it restricts. If it decides a justice, it the right to appeal it is unjust and becomes the result which it restricts. Appeal recovery volume the legal stability compared to is the system which makes an entity justice first of all. And this system justice decision form profit of the accused it is unjust and the fact that it deprives a system for it is. The criminal procedure law providing, the reexamination which it is doing, at decision judging and emergency with system and sameness, the recovery of right to appeal system is recognized with the process which excludes double jeopardy effect. Recently the research and the discussion regarding criminal procedure law opening a court are actively advanced from viewpoint of administration of justice reform. And also the simplification, nimbleness plan of criminal case administration of justice process are discussed. Against the recovery of right to appeal system specially only it will be stopping in the degree which introduces only a relation regulation to be, the research against hereupon almost there is to a condition which is not. The dissertation which in short, it sees with afterwords observes a same contents and the reporter it does. First it investigates the relation and a legislation maintenance plan of the recovery of right to appeal and reexamination from the dissertation which it sees. Second, Representative the recovery of right to appeal it will be able to requisition in order, provided special law at constitution should have infringed the justice claim which is guaranteed with, it tries to observe the legislation opening a court plan against hereupon. Third, The regulation regarding the recovery of right to appeal requisition and a suspension of executant at constitution is quick it is guaranteed and infringe the right which will administer justice with, it investigates a legislation opening a court plan, it does. And it relates with the recovery of right to appeal system and against the propriety of necessary justice suspension of executant regulation it observes and the reporter it does.