론문(論文) : 국가주의와 역사의 착종성: 다카무레 이쓰에(高群逸枝)를 중심으로

이선이 ( Sun Yi Lee ) 이화사학연구소 2014 梨花史學硏究 Vol.0 No.49

This study is an essay intended to consider a few issues relating to women’s history by examining Takamure Itsue(1894-1964). Therefore, it aims to reflect on the fundamental topics of history, such as the implications for history of Takamure’s actions as a feminist and female historian, rather than historically studying Takamure as an individual. Takamure Itsue was born in Kumamoto Prefecture on January 18, 1894. Her father was a primary school principal and he taught Chinese classics to his daughter in a countryside blessed by nature. Takamure’s preference for classics and history originates from her father’s Chinese education and her mother’s influence from childhood, which later formed the foundation for her historical research. This study focuses on the 1930s and 1940s in particular, during which period she devoted herself to studying women’s history by immersing herself in it from 1931 onwards. This period coincides with the time when Japan became increasingly involved in the Sino-Japanese War, which makes her indispensable when studying the situations and ideologies of the time. Starting out as an anarchist, Takamure published a number of fanatical texts around 1931 that praised the war, justifying the ‘Pacific War’ as a ‘holy war’ under the logic of ‘marriage harmony(婚姻和協).’ Before then, she had been a defender of the urban lower classes and farm villagers who had fallen into financial difficulties due to the influences of urbanization and industrialization. She advocated for ‘anti-home’ and ‘anti-citizen’ as a critic of modernization more intense than any other. What this study aims to focus on is to examine why she, who had been so cool-headed and had such a critical mind regarding modernity (as shown by ‘anti-home’ and ‘anti-citizen’), could not keep her distance from the modern state and people that had recently come into power. Furthermore, what are the historical and social implications for the course of ‘history’ when an anti-modernist and anarchist converts to being a supporter? These are the two questions this study aims to answer. Takamure found an alternative form of ‘anti-modernism’ (represented by ‘anti-home’ and ‘anti-citizen’) in the ancient kingdom of Japan, stating that the integration of the ancient Japanese kingdom was achieved, not by armed conquest, but by marriage harmony or genealogical ties, which was possible thanks to the existence of the maternal clan since ancient times. Moreover, she declared, “there is no question but that foreign civilizations are inferior to the Japanese civilization that is built on the conscious foundation of the harmony of clans.” As such, her ‘inspiration’ for ‘anti-modernism’ was in the ‘Japanese state’ and ‘people’. Furthermore, Takamure’s assessment that she “thought the true meaning of history is ‘history that gives courage for women to live’ and not history that conveys what happened as it is” shows what she considered the meaning of history to be at a time that was seen as a critical period for Japan. However, there are criticisms of the fact that Takamure’s studies involved ‘creating theories.’ This, perhaps, shows an example of how history is “not something that conveys what happened as it is” but “something that poses ‘current’ problems about ‘the past,’” as merely one of the possible narrations of the past, limited by the ideology of the historian as well as by the methodologies based on that ideology.

초기 자유시 담당층의 정체성 모색과 그 의미 - 김억, 주요한을 중심으로-

이선이 ( Sun Yi Lee ) 국제어문학회 2002 국제어문 Vol.26 No.-

딸기 수출품종 육성을 위한 딸기 유전자원 특성검정

이선이(Sun Yi Lee),김대영(Dae Young Kim),이옥진(Oak Jin Lee),김상규(Sang Gyu Kim),문지혜(Ji-Hye Moon),노일래(Il Rae Rho) 한국원예학회 2019 한국원예학회 학술발표요지 Vol.2019 No.10

일제강점기 한국과 일본의 조선민족성 담론 비교

이선이 ( Sun Yi Lee ) 국제비교한국학회 2008 비교한국학 Comparative Korean Studies Vol.16 No.2

만해 한룡운(韓龍雲) 문학(文學)에 나타난 탈식민주의적(脫植民主義的) 인식

이선이 ( Lee Sun-yi ) 한국어문교육연구회 2003 어문연구(語文硏究) Vol.31 No.2

本 硏究는 萬海 韓龍雲 文學에 나타난 脫植民主義的 認識을 밝히는 데 그 目的이 있다. 이는 기존의 연구가 지나치게 萬海 文學의 民族主義的 性格만을 부각시키고 있다는 점에 대한 批判意識에서 출발한다. 만해의 사상적 측면을 살펴보면, 그는 언제나 普遍思想으로서의 世界平和思想 안에서 민족 독립의 정당성을 주장하였다. 이러한 사상적 지향성은 문학 작품에서 脫植民主義的 認識의 표출로 드러난다. 따라서 本 硏究에서는 萬海의 詩와 小說에 나타난 탈식민주의적 인식을 구체적으로 살펴보았다. 作品 分析은 식민주의에 대한 批判과 克服 樣相을 중심 내용으로 한다. 이를 통해 萬海 韓龍雲 文學은 단순한 抗日文學이나 民族文學이 아니라 近代性과 帝國主義에 대한 적극적 대응이라는 탈식민주의적 성격을 보이고 있음을 알 수 있다. This article intends to clarify the perceptions of the post colonialism found in the literature of Manhae Han, Yong-un. The study starts with the criticism that the existing studies have only highlighted the nationalistic characters of his literature. As to his ideological aspects, Manhae has always insisted the legitimacy of national independence within the idea of world peace as the general philosophy. Such an ideological orientation may be viewed as the tendency toward the post colonialism. Thus, this article looked specifically into the characters of the post colonialism found in the poems and novels of Manhae. The analysis of his works was focused on the contents relating to the criticism and survival patterns of the colonialism. The analysis shows that the literature of Manhae Han, Yong-un is not merely of anti-Japanese or nationalistic natures, but that it contains the post colonialistic features of aggressive responses to the modernism and imperialism.

국산 국화품종 ‘백설’의 동계생산 시 야간난방개시 온도에 따른 생장 및 개화반응

이선이(Sun Yi Lee),조명환(Myeong Hwan Cho),권준국(Joon Kook Kwon),박경섭(Kyoung Sub Park),최효길(Hyo Gil Choi),최영환(Young Whan Choi) 한국원예학회 2013 한국원예학회 학술발표요지 Vol.2013 No.10

일본 문학의 ‘번역’에서 보이는 역사인식 고찰

이선이(Lee Sun-yi) 가천대학교 아시아문화연구소 2010 아시아문화연구 Vol.18 No.-

After the liberation, South Korean intellectuals strove for a development of a National Literature, and the so-called 'Japanese trend(日流)' received an enormous favor after 1990. When we consider the popularity of Japanese culture, it seems that some South Koreans who accepted Japanese culture had not been influenced by the unenthusiastic criticisms of Japanese literature. Considering a sense of superiority evident among South Koreans which can be attributed from a haunting past, any form of Japanese tendency is easily dismissed. However, the inclination of some South Koreans toward Japanese' historical novels, which lasted for more than four decade, proves to be an exception. This study attempts to investigate the opposing phenomena in the appreciation of Japanese literature through analysis of the translation process in the novel 'Tokugawa Ieyasu'. A critical view on how South Koreans became deliberately inclined and appreciative of Japanese history is explored, thus the likelihood of having a unique perspective and historical awareness throughout the process.

중국에서 저술된 한국근현대문학사의 문화횡단적 실천 - 남한문학사ㆍ북한문학사ㆍ자국문학사라는 세 겹의 프리즘 -

이선이 ( Lee Sun-yi ) 경희대학교 비교문화연구소 2017 비교문화연구 Vol.48 No.-

이 연구는 중국에서 저술된 한국근현대문학사를 남한문학사, 북한문학사, 자국문학사와 비교하여 서술 양상을 살핌으로써, 이들 텍스트에 나타난 문화횡단적 실천을 살피고자 하였다. 지금까지 중국에서 저술된 한국문학사는 약 25종이며, 이 가운데 한국근현대문학사는 약 16종이다. 저술 목적으로 볼 때, 연구용 문학사보다는 교재용 문학사가 압도적으로 많다. 시각과 서술내용으로 볼 때, 남한문학사를 수용한 경우와 북한문학사를 수용한 경우 그리고 남북문학사를 함께 수용한 경우로 나눌 수 있다. 각각의 대표적인 텍스트를 선정하여 그 인식과 서술 양상을 남한문학사, 북한문학사, 중국문학사와 비교한 후, 의미의 이동과 생성의 지점을 살펴보았다. 그 결과, 한국문학사 인식과 서술에 있어서 몇 가지 의미 있는 전언을 발견할 수 있었다. 첫째, 우리의 근현대문학사는 서양문학의 영향만을 강조함으로써 중국문학의 영향을 간과했다는 점에 대한 반성적 시각 둘째, 북한문학사를 주체적이고 객관적으로 인식함으로써 통일문학사 기술의 한 가능성을 제시한 점 셋째, 순수문학중심주의에서 벗어나 문학의 대중성에 대한 강조와 다양한 매체와 연관된 작품을 수용하는 시각 확장의 가능성을 열어준다는 점이 그것이다. This study compares the history of modern Korean literature written in China with the history of South Korean literature, the history of North Korean literature and the history of national literature, explores aspects of narrative and therefore examines transcultural practice presented in such texts. There have hitherto been approximately 25 works on the history of Korean literature written in China, and 16 of 25 works are on the history of modern Korean literature. Regarding their purpose, the number of pedagogical works outstandingly exceeds the number of research works. In terms of perspective and contents, it can be divided into three categories; one that only embraces the history of South Korean literature, another embracing the history of North Korean literature only and the other embracing the history of South Korean and North Korean literature. This study has selected representative texts from each category and compared recognition and narrative aspects to that of the history of South Korean literature, the history of North Korean literature and the history of Chinese literature. It further examines loci of definitions` transfer and formation as well. As a result, this study reveals valuable understanding of recognition and narration of the history of Korean literature. First, this study offers an introspective attitude, as the history of modern Korean literature accentuates influence of only Western literature, overlooking influence of Chinese literature. Second, this study proposes a new narrative perspective on the history of Unified Korean literature through independent and objective identification of the history of North Korean literature. Last, it emphasizes popularization of literature - aside from pure literary-centrism - and expands possibilities of embracing distinct works relevant to multimedia.

저일조 조건에 따른 국내 육성 국화품종의 생장 및 개화반응

이선이(Sun Yi Lee),조명환(Myeng-Whan Cho),권준국(Joon Kook Kwon),박경섭(Kyoung Sub Park),최효길(Hyo Gil Choi),이연화(Yeon Hwa Lee),최영환(Young Whan Choi) 한국원예학회 2014 한국원예학회 학술발표요지 Vol.2014 No.5

문화인식과 문화교육 - 한국 문화 교육을 위한 제언-

이선이 ( Lee Sun-yi ) 한국언어문화교육학회 2007 언어와 문화 Vol.3 No.1

The purpose of this study is to developing propose for Korean Culture Education. Especially, this study focus on how to have the right viewpoint of the Korean Culture Education. First of all, the major premise of this discussion is a reflection on the Modernism, Progressivism and Nationalism in the recognition about culture. Secondly, we deal with the meaning and problems of the recognition method about the existing cross-culture which are ethnocentrism, cultural relativism, multiculturalism, and education for international understanding in the Era of Globalization. Finally, this study considers the analysis method of the culture difference and the actual strategy of culture education. In conclusion, we need to change our mind about Korean culture education from just contents of culture education itself to ‘how to teach the culture’