http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
대립계 포도 천창개폐형 비가림하우스의 최적 파이프 규격
염성현(Sung Hyun Yum),윤남규(Nam Gyu Yun),김경원(Gyeong Won Kim),이성현(Sung Hyoun Lee),조용호(Yong Ho Cho),박서준(Seo Jun Park),박문균(Mun Kyun Park) (사)한국생물환경조절학회 2005 생물환경조절학회지 Vol.14 No.2
본 연구는 기존 비닐하우스 아연도 강관을 사용한 하우스 폭 3.6m와 5m 천창개폐형 대립계 포도 비가림히우스에 대한 구조적 안전성을 검토하고, 인장강도 400Nㆍ㎜?²(SGH400 등) 이상의 파이프를 사용하는 조건에서 하우스 폭 5m인 천창개폐형 대립계 포도 비가림하우스에 대하여 구조적으로 안전한 최적 파이프 규격을 제시하고자 수행하였다. 주기둥 3m×서까래 60㎝인 천창개폐형 3.6m 비가림하우스의 경우, 적설심 35㎝에서는 구조적으로 안전한 것으로 분석되었으나 측면 및 전후면 풍속 35mㆍs?¹에서는 불안전한 것으로 나타났으며, 동일 주기둥과 서까래 간격을 갖는 천창개폐형 5m 비가림하우스의 경우에는 적설심 35와 풍속 35mㆍs?¹에서 모두 불안전하여 구조보강이 필요한 것으로 분석되었다. 그리고 동일 주기둥과 서까래 간격을 가지나 인장강도 400Nㆍ㎜?² 이상을 갖는 파이프를 사용하는 조건에서 천창개폐형 5m 비가림하우스의 최적 파이프 규격은 지붕높이 1.6m(아치형)와 지붕높이 1.8m(복숭아형)에 대하여 동일하게 두 경우로 규격화할 수 있었다. 즉, 안전풍속 35mㆍs?¹와 안전적설심 40㎝에서 구조적으로 안전한 서까래 규격은 φ31.8 × 1.5t@600이었으며, 안전풍속 30mㆍs?¹와ss 안전 적설심 35㎝에서는 서까래 φ25.4 × 1.5t@600인 것으로 분석되었다. 덕면으로부터 곡부보까지의 높이는 안전적설심보다는 안전풍속에 직접적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었으며, 처마를 높임에 따라 측면풍속에 대해서는 방풍벽파이프(측벽서까래)를, 전후면 풍속에 대해서는 마구리기둥의 규격을 강화하여야 하는 것으로 분석되었다. This study was carried out to: (1) analyze structural stability of representative rain-sheltering greenhouses for large-grain grapevine cultivation with widths of 3.6 m and 5 m in case of using the existing pipe for agriculture; (2) present the optimum specification of pipes in the greenhouse with a width of 5 m under the condition of using the pipe of which ultimate strength has been above 400 Nㆍ㎜?²; (3) evaluate stability and also present the optimum specification of pipes as eaves height was augmented. The above analyses were done for greenhouses with roof vents and also with a main-column interval of 3 m and a rafter interval of 60 ㎝, First, the existing 3.6 m greenhouse with a rafter of φ25.4 × 1.5 t@600 was stable for a snow-depth of 35 ㎝ but unstable for a wind velocity of 35 mㆍs?¹. Meanwhile the existing 5 m greenhouse with the same rafter was not stable for a wind velocity of 335 mㆍs?¹ as well as a snow-depth of 35 ㎝. This meant that existing greenhouses had to be reinforced to secure stability. Second, the specification of pipes, especially rafter, could be classified as two cases. One had a structural stability at a safe wind velocity of 35 mㆍs?¹ and a safe snow-depth of 40 ㎝ for which stability the rafter had to be φ31.8 × 1.5 t@600, and the other had a stability at 30 mㆍs?¹-35 ㎝ at the specification of rafter φ25.4 × 1.5 t@600. Finally, eaves height had a significant effect on safe wind velocity. But it had little influence on safe snow-depth. The results showed that the specification of side-wall pipes had to be reinforced for the safe side velocity according to the increment of eaves height and similarly the specification of fore-end post for the safe fore-end velocity.
박세준,이인복,홍세운,권경석,하태환,윤남규,김형권,권순홍,Park, Se-Jun,Lee, In-Bok,Hong, Se-Woon,Kwon, Kyeong-Seok,Ha, Tae-Hwan,Yun, Nam-Gyu,Kim, Hyung-Gewon,Kwon, Sun-Hong 한국농공학회 2013 한국농공학회논문집 Vol.55 No.6
Ventilation efficiency has an important role in agricultural facilities such as greenhouse and livestock house to keep internally optimum environmental condition. Age-of-air concept allows to assess the ventilation efficiency of an agricultural facility according to estimating the ability of fresh air supply and contaminants emission using LMA and LMR. Most of these methods use a tracer gas method which has some limitations in experiment like dealing unstable and invisible gas. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a straightforward method to calculate age-of-air values with CFD simulation which has the advantage of saving computational time and resources and these method can solve the limitations in experiment using tracer gas method. The main idea of LMA computation is to solve the passive scalar transport equation with the assumption that the production of the time scalar throughout the room is uniform. In case of LMR calculation, the transport of the time scalar was reversed compulsively using UDF. The methodology to validate the results of this study was established by comparing with preceding research that had performed a computing LMA and LMR value by laboratory experiments and CFD simulations using tracer gas. As a result, the error was presented similarly level of results of preceding research. Some big errors could be caused by stagnated area and incongruity turbulence model. while the computational time was reduced to almost one fourth of that by preceding research.