RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        근린재생 거버넌스 유형별 중간지원조직 운영특징 연구

        여혜진(Yeo, Hae-Jin) 대한건축학회 2014 대한건축학회논문집 Vol.30 No.9

        The purpose of this study is to explore the intermediary agency’s operating characteristics in the three typologies of neighborhood regeneration governance. Case study is focused on Japan, UK, and US’s related legal system, planning system, and intermediary agencies activities. Case Study is composed of regeneration type with public-led, semi-public-led, and neighborhood-led. Individual case shows distinguishing roles of intermediary agency governing neighborhood regeneration governance; government-affiliated organizations for Setagaya Machizukuri in Tokyo, non-departmental public body for Castle Vale project in Birmingham, and strong partnership of community organization with local foundation for Dudley Street Neighborhood Initiative in Boston. Policy implications are as follows; first, intermediary agency has an important role for structuring governance, which is vertically engaging public sector with community organizations and horizontally engaging various local agencies. Second, in the early stage of neighborhood regeneration, public-led intermediary agencies are reliable but need to develop the governance framework for more neighborhood-led governance. Third, it is critical to set up community business belong to neighborhood-led governance for sustainable regeneration.

      • KCI등재후보
      • 길찾기 좋은 서울(Legible Seoul)을 위한 전략

        여혜진(Hae Jin Yeo),이동훈(Donghoon Lee),이창(Chang Yi),전혜선(Hae Sun Chun),서선영(Sunyoung Seo) 서울연구원 2011 서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서 Vol.- No.-

        This study aims to explore problems of the way-finding system of Seoul subway station. In case of Seoul, there has been many problems of losing a way, looking around, going on a bootless errand, going back, asking and so forth for subway users whether they are foreigners or not. Specifically focused on four densely-used subway stations which are Seoul Station, City Hall Station, Express Bus Terminal Station, Myeong-dong Station, the research arguments are developed through site visit, investigation and analysis, discussion meeting and interviews. Investigating the real condition of signs in four subway stations, 3 types of problems are determined. The most serious problem is that the signs is not working as a way-finding system at the level of transfer guide, way-out and upper space guide, and circulation decision point guide. These problems are mostly driven because of failing to properly locate the sign and to provide the necessary level of information detail. The reason of those problems I examined from the point of planning process, production structure, and finally organization. In overall, the production of subway signs pre-empt sign system planning as well as subway sign manual do subway design guideline. Also the subway sign guideline and manual have not been developed based on behavioral and cognitive study, so it does not have any exact measuring standard and human scale to locate the signs. Policy implication is to suggest a supplementation of subway sign guideline and manual based on user’s behavioral and cognitive characteristics, integrating interagency for better quality control of way-finding system, and several demonstration projects to improve sign system and remodeling projects.

      • KCI등재

        사회적 경제조직의 지역공동체 역량 형성에 관한 연구

        여혜진(Yeo, Hae-Jin),박성남(Park, Sung-Nam),김민지(Kim, Min-Ji) 한국도시설계학회 2015 도시설계 : 한국도시설계학회지 Vol.6 No.4

        이 연구는 지역의 생활환경 문제를 개선하기 위해 주민 중심으로 조직된 사회적 경제조직이 주민 주도형 사업 활성화에 기여할 수 있을 것을 전제로 사회적 경제조직의 현황 및 운영 실태를 파악하고, 지역공동체 역량 형성 여건과 그 특징을 살펴보는 것이 목적이다. 분석 결과를 정리하면 첫째, 우리나라에서 생활환경개선사업을 본격적으로 수행하는 사회적 경제조직은 34개로 전체 사회적 경제조직의 0.6%에 그치며, 이 중 48%가 수도권에 집중되어 있다. 둘째, 사회적 경제조직이 수행하는 생활환경개선사업은 주택건설, 주택개보수, (취약계층)집수리, 주거현물급여사업, 에너지효율개선사업, 저소득층 주거환경개선사업, 마을만들기, 텃밭/공원가꾸기, 마을카페 등 시설운영 등으로 다양하지만, 지역사회의 필요보다는 정부예산이 지원되는 취약계층 주거복지사업에 집중되어 있는 편이다. 셋째, 대부분 3~4년된 신생기업이지만 개인, 조직, 네트워크 역량 차원에서 지역사회의 인식과 참여형태의 변화, 이를 통한 조직 및 네트워크 구축이라는 차원에서는 지역공동체 역량 형성의 긍정적인 성과를 보여주고 있다. The study aims to explore the present conditions of social enterprises which are conducting residential environment improvement and to study how they build community capacity. The findings are as follows. First, there are 34 such organizations in Korea. This is only 0.6% of total social enterprises and 48% of them are located on Seoul and Koyung-gi Province. Second, their main business areas vary covering raging from housing construction, housing remodelling, housing welfare projects, building energy improvement, community building, urban gardening, community cafe business, etc. The requirements of government subsidy, however, make the organizations targets for the poor than the overall community members. Third, even though they are newly established, they already show positive impacts on community recognition, public participation, and community network. In this consideration, the social enterprises which are conducting residential environmental improvement projects contribute to build the regeneration capacity of the community.

      • 도시 준공공공간의 보행활성화 방안 -건물전면공간을 중심으로-

        여혜진 ( Hae Jin Yeo ),임희지 ( Hee Ji Lim ),맹다미 ( Da Mi Maeng ),백세나 ( Ce Na Baik ),이승희,김진아,정재용,한광야,소갑수 서울시정개발연구원 2009 연구보고서 Vol.2009 No.41

        While the street-and-building interface has been a key element in urban design for better street in New York, Boston, London and Tokyo, there has been a little attention to this practice in Seoul countparts. This difference stems from the identification of public realm on the street and public function for pedestrian activity. The street-and-building interface in Seoul is currently defined as a semi-public space but in reality it is a privately-owned space. This study aims to redefine the street-and-building interface as a semi-public space making a huge impact on the scenery of public space "street" and creating the clear character of urban streetscape for better pedestrian flow and pedestrian activity just like the building does. It also delivers several design principles and institutional approaches for better semi-public space. Several streets in each city are selected for an in-depth analysis of the street-and-building interface. Specific cases selected are Teheran-ro, Kangnam-daero, Echondong-gil, Garosu-gil(Seoul), 5th Avenue(New York), Newbury Street(Boston), London Wall Street, Brompton Road(London), Naka-dori, Hibiya-dori, Omotesando-dori, Aoyama-dori(Tokyo). The spatial characteristics / pedestrian function and land use / regulations of street-and-building interface has been reviewed. In-depth study is focused on several aspects of street-and-building interface; scale, spatial characteristics, pedestrian circulation, land use, policy regulation. It is an effort to capture a detailed pattern of street-and-building interaction regarding pedestrian flow and pedestrian activity. Typology of street-and-building interface is identified in terms of the spatial characteristics and functions. Spatial types of the street-and-building interface are first, street-widening type, second, front-access·front-connecting type, and third, plaza type. Functional types are first, intermediary between street and building, second, structuring pedestrian-oriented streetscape, and third, holistic urban design language for place-making The findings are as follows: 1) all of the case study areas except London have more space in front of the buildings by setback, 2) streets in Seoul have the most wide variations in setback and those in London have little variations forming orderly street-wall, 3) street-and-building interface type in Seoul is mostly simple street-widening vis-a-vis those in New York, Boston, London and Tokyo are mostly front-access·front-connecting type and plaza type, 4) street furniture, subway station and facilities in interface area are a lot and privately occupied in Seoul cases rather than the other case causing obstruction of pedestrian flow and pedestrian activity. 5) commercial streets in New York, Boston, London and Tokyo well maintained ground level land use such as small shops, restaurant, cafe and cultural use etc to facilitate pedestrian activities. Seoul regulates the street and street-and-building interface by a general statute such as Building Law and Planning Law. However New York, Boston, London and Tokyo regulate them by a special statute such as special district control and design guideline. Recently New York Zoning Ordinances strictly regulate by incentive a plaza type front space and prohibit ambiguous space for better pedestrian activity and orderly street wall. This is strictly implemented especially for important commercial corridors such as 5th Avenue. Policy recommendations are as follows, 1) deliberation of street-and-building interface on the basis of street characters, 2) set-up the design guildeline for the variety of semi-public space which deliver Seoul`s livability and dynamic of social activities, 3) incentive differentiation Strategy according to the contribution of pedestrian flow and pedestrian activity, and 4) street-and-building unitary design-management system.

      • KCI우수등재
      • KCI등재후보
      • KCI우수등재

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼