http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
급성기 족관절 염좌의 근위취혈(近位取穴)과 원위취혈(遠位取穴)의 치료 효과 비교 연구
김대중,최용준,김도호,엄재연,송계화,이진석,조남근,Kim, Dae-Joong,Choi, Yong-Joon,Kim, Do-Ho,Um, Jae-Yeon,Song, Gye-Hwa,Lee, Jin-Seok,Cho, Nam-Geun 대한침구의학회 2007 대한침구의학회지 Vol.24 No.4
Objective : The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of near acupuncture point needling and remote acupuncture point needling on treating ankle sprain of acute stage. Methods : From March 1st, 2007 to May 30th, 2007, the 50 patients who had visited Iksan oriental medical hospital, Wonkwang university with acute ankle sprain were divided into 2 groups ; one group took near acupunture point needling, and the other group took remote acupunture point needling. Both group had been treated with the same additional rest, ice, compression and elevation(RICE) therapy. To evaluating the efficiency of each treatment, Visual Analog Scale(VAS) and Ankle-Hindfoot Scale(AHS) were applied before 1st treatment and after 3rd treatment. Results : As a result of evaluation by using AHS, the score change comparison between the two groups had no significance after the treatment. As a result of evaluation by using VAS, treatment score of remote acupucture point needling was marked lower than score of near acupucture point needling. Conclusion : Remote acupucture point needling is more effective than near acupucture point needling in controlling the pain of acute ankle sprain.