http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
청소년 언어문화 실태 연구 -구어 의사소통을 중심으로-
민병곤 ( Min Byeong-gon ),정혜승 ( Chung Hye-seung ),정현선 ( Jeong Hyeon-seon ),김정자 ( Kim Jeong-ja ),권은선 ( Kwon Eun-sun ),박성석 ( Park Seong-seog ),이병하 ( Lee Byung-ha ),임해랑 ( Lim Hae-rang ),박현정 ( Park Hyun-jeon 한국어교육학회(구 한국국어교육연구학회) 2017 국어교육 Vol.0 No.159
This study aims to examine and discuss Korean adolescents’ oral language culture, based on the results of the survey from 3,429 adolescents, ranging from 10 to 18 years old, which was conducted by National Institute of Korean Language. Researchers defined the adolescents’ language culture as a hierarchical structure which consists of three layers, namely, expression, behavior, and thought. Unlike previous studies which have focused on the expression layer, this study tries to focus on the behavior and thought layer of adolescents’ language culture. Researchers selected four categories-two are from behavior layer, and another two are from thought layer-as the locus which Korean adolescents’ oral language culture shows its unique characteristics: (a) Active Participation in Public Communication(APPC); (b) Empathic Attitude in Private Communication(EAPC); (c) Recognition of Language as Self-Expression(RLSE); and (d) Recognition of Communication Role Model(RCRM). And Researchers analyzed the difference of survey result by school year, sex, and scale of residential area. The findings are as follows: (1) There is decreases in three cultural aspects, including APPC(public speech and discussion), EAPC(with parents), and RCRM; (2) There is difference between male and female adolescents in three cultural aspects, including APPC(discussion), EAPC(with peers), and RLSE. Female adolescents where higher than male in all cultural aspects; (3) There is difference among metropolitan, urban, and rural adolescents in three cultural aspects, including APPC(public speech and discussion), EAPC(with peers and with parents), RLSE. In all cultural aspects, metropolitan adolescents were higher than urban and rural adolescents or than rural adolescents. Some general discussions were given in conclusion.