http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 김병태 ( Kim Byeong Tae ) (검색결과 33 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Byeong Tae Kim(金炳台) 건국대학교 경제경영연구소 1989 상경연구 Vol.14 No.1
The government has built up the rural-industrial complex since 1984, with the Law for the Encouragement of Exploitation of Peasant’s and Fisher’s Income Source enacted at the end of 1983, to achieve the balanced economic development of farming and fishing villages by exploiting farmer’s and fisher’s income source and increasing their income through inviting the establishment of manufacturing factories and service firms. The rural-industrial complexes created until 1988 are 122 ones. But few of the factories or firms have relation to the agricultural products, and none of them are operated with the villagers’s money be the villagers themselves. The factories and firms cstablished in the complexes, though they have received active support from the government, have had a great difficulties in securing the necessary labor powers, because they have not been supplied with their needed labor powers from rural areas where they are located. They cannot get not only the skilled labor but simple labor adequate to their needs; the simple labor is difficult to secure, since it flows into the agricultural work in the busy season for farmers. The factories and firms have been built up in rural areas with an eye to the low wages. Therefore, though employment are extended a little in rural areas, the wages they earn is very low. The employed villagers of the 7 model complexes established since 1984 are only 44% of the total employees and their monthly wages around 200,000, with which they cannon mark their livings. Under such conditions, they remain part-time peasants tilling the soil on the other side and their farm work cannot be done properly. Thus the specialized peasants (rich peasants), who are not engaged in the gactories, came to experience the grave lack of labor power. Consequently both of the rural-industrial complexes and the farms became difficult to operate, and only the employed works receive a little benefit by earning their low wages. Therefore, the project to increase the rural-industrial complex to 350 until 1993 and employ a million villagers of rural areas should be modified. The establishment of rural-industrial complexes must be pushed forward in collaboration with the local community development plan along with the national laud development plan and the measures for the improvement of agricultural structure, which should be preceded by or run paralled with the measures to make the farms large-sized for the mechanized full-sized operation and the labor powers left after the farm operation absorbed into the industrial complexes.
-
Byeong Tae Kim(金炳台) 건국대학교 경제경영연구소 1984 상경연구 Vol.9 No.1
The land price of a country, based upon the revinew that is obtained by owning the land, the interest level and basic factors, is prescribed by the yes or no of currency inflation of the country and of the investment opportunity, people’s income level, the purchasing power of land, anticipation on the future. The competition owning the land of development-scheduling areas by only the reason of owning the concerned land will spread under the institution occuping profit of development by the nation or the society and so the speculation will happen. A sharp rise of the land price by the speculation boom is due to defects of institution, not a speculator. The speculation in the society of competition is a general customary practice and a necssary condition of stabilization. If it were not for the speculative incentive, the future trading will not be realized. The future trading realized by the speculative is equal to system for the stabilization of price. We do not think that the speculation is vicious, but we must make haste with the system that the unfair profit does not be obtained by the speculation. If the system is estabilished, the speculation preferably will be affirmative role in development. Assuming that the nation gives private-owning of development profit to take its own course and only partially can gather the profit, the more the nation developes a territory and particuarly does a priority developement, the more the owner of the relevant areas can take a development returns. When the banking money leaned upon special men is freezed, the land lose the creative power of credit. In the competition of purchase of land staring at occupation of the demelopement profit, the skyrocketing of land price reaches a climax.
-
김병태(Kim Byeong Tae) 건국대학교 경제경영연구소 1991 상경연구 Vol.16 No.1
Each year Asahi Agriculture Prize, established by the Japanese Asahi Newspaper Company, is given to five to seven model groups among the nationwide producer groups. From 1963,the beginning year, to 1988,164 producer groups were awarded this prize. Under the Japanese economic environment which achieved successive super-high economic growth, today’s Japanese agriculture keeps finding its way out of internal and external pressure. Through a cooperative agricultural production the limitations of a small-scale farm management can be overcome. While the Asahi Agriculture Prize at its start was given to the producer group consisting of the whole villagers, later it also included small groups. Because many farmers moved from the country, a large organization could not be maintained. The spirit of the Basic Law of Agriculture which was enacted in 1961 changed the protective policy of agriculture for the whole farmers to the policy taking disruption of farming class as a result of economic growth as an opportunity of agricultural modernization. That is, the Basic Law considered the following sequential effects: modernization of agriculture makes agricultural population move to other industries, thereby reduces farming family, thereby mobilizes farm lands left in country, thereby increases farm size for professional farmers, and thereby promotes self-supporting management. But the question about expanding farm size was frustrated by farmers keeping their side jobs. Also, theories which blamed the direction of the Basic Law of Agriculture for removing small poor farmers from the country and concerns that it would take country into a dark crisis were proved to be ineffective. In practice, farmers with a side job reserved their ownership of land for cooperation of management, and enlisted their lands in a large-scale farm management.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
