http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 김규완(Kim Kew-Won) (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
김규완(Kim Kew-Won),김성호(Kim Sung-Ho) 한국체육과학회 2009 한국체육과학회지 Vol.18 No.4
The purpose of this study is to investigate the difference of League which the frequency of pass that between offence area and defense area. For example forward, cross, back, short, long of pass. To determine whether we have played a VHS tapes each frame for N-league and K-league of Championship. Firstly the international Matches 110x75,which divide the ground by 16 and than bisect 8 of offence area. Secondly divide the direction of the pass by forward pass 150 , back pass 150 , left and right crossing each 30 and the distance of the pass by short pass (15m),middle pass (16m-30m) long pass (31m~) In the effect is recorded to the program of Microsoft office power point 2007. The results are shown in a table. The first record is by area groups that put a mark. The second is about marks and by area groups record the frequency of the pass, The third it find the total of result for N-league and K-league. The results were as follows; 1. Both of N-league, K-league are indicative highly for forward cross, Back in defense area. The other hands between crossing and back pass was quit same while success and failure of forward pass was significantly high all of them. N-league and K-league each types as distance was shown low failure rate to offence area and defense area. As failure frequency of long pass was significantly high at all. 2. The type of pass that compare to N-league and K-league. K-league was high in forward pass and N-league was recorded high success. 3. The type of distance that compare to N- league and K-league that all the type of distance recorded almost same in each leagues but N-league of middle pass was significantly high succession.
-
2002, 2006월드컵 예선 한국팀 패스분석에 의한 경기력 비교
김성호(Kim Sung-Ho),김규완(Kim Kew-Won) 한국체육과학회 2009 한국체육과학회지 Vol.18 No.2
The purpose of this study is to investigate the 2002,2006 World Cup which Korea’s national team impact on what are the factors, path analysis are efficient, some factors was participated in 2002 Korea/Japan World Cup and 2006 Germany World Cup of that each 3 games total 6 games of Korea's National Team preliminary. The frequency of the pass measured forward pass, cross pass, back pass and short pass, middle pass, long pass to offence and defence area to section of Path analysis. To determine whether we have played a VHS tapes each frame for Firstly the international Matches 110x75,which divide the ground by 16 and than bisect 8 of offence area. Secondly divide the direction of the pass by forward pass 150, back pass 150, left and right crossing each 30 and the distance of the pass by short pass (15m), middle pass (16m~), long pass (31m~) In the effect is recorded to the program of Microsoft office power point 2007. The results are shown in a table. The first record is by area groups that put a mark. The second is about marks and by area groups record is by area groups recorded the frequency of the pass. The third it find the total of result for 2002 Korea/Japan World Cup and 2006 Germany World Cup of FIFA World Cup. The analysis factors measured by SPSS (ver12.0) each types of forward pass, crossing, back pass and the distance of the pass as short pass, middle pass, long pass for each section was analyzed by frequency of offence area and defence area. Based on this analysis, each type of pass and independent t- test measured for the difference between success and failure of each type of distance. And dependent t-test was analyzed for each section of forward, crossing, back of pass and pass of distance as short pass, middle pass, long pass of 2002 Korea/Japan World Cup and 2006 Germany World Cup as well. Theory level is that all statistics measured a = .05. The results were as follows; 1. The success type of pass and failure was very high frequency in defence area success of forward pass than offence area. 2. Back pass and forward pass are same as the frequency of use in the offence area. And back pass is in the defence area as well. 3. In defence area of middle pass achieved success showed the many frequency that but as low frequency of failure, appeared highly successful. 4. In overall type of each pass relatively frequency of success offence and defence was significantly high all of them then showed low frequency of failure. Also in pass results from each distance that short pass was high frequency of success while it was significantly low frequency of failure.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
