성령강림과 한국교회 □ 사도행전 2:1-21 □

황인복 한일장신대학교 한국성경연구원 1995 성경연구(설교자를 위한) Vol.1 No.6

과산화수소의 정량을 위한 토끼의 간-조직 전극

황인복,권효식,김두영 충북대학교 과학교육연구소 2002 과학교육연구논총 Vol.18 No.1

The response characteristics of the new biosensor developed by the co-immobilization of rabbit liver tissue and ferrocene in a carbon paste matrix for the amperometric determination of hydrogen peroxide were evaluated. In the range of electrode potential examined (-0.35∼-0.05V vs. Ag/AgCl), the length of the response was relatively short (t95% = 12 s) and it responded in the wide range of pH and its biocatalytic stability was superior. Also, it's detection limit was 2.25×10­5M (S/N=3) and it had relatively good selectivity to the materials considered to disturb the response. The result of this study using rabbit liver tissue can be utilized as the basic informatin for the determination of hydrogen peroxide.

"한국교회의 현주소" □ 요한계시록 3장 14~22절 □

황인복 한일장신대학교 한국성경연구원 2006 성경연구(설교자를 위한) Vol.12 No.8

성령강림과 한국교회 : 사도행전 2:1-21

황인복 한국성경연구원 1995 설교자를 위한 성경연구 Vol.- No.6

"승리자에게 새 예루살렘을!" □ 요한계시록 21:1-8 □

황인복 한일장신대학교 한국성경연구원 2001 성경연구(설교자를 위한) Vol.7 No.6

“인공지능 발명에 대한 고찰” - AI 발명자 인정의 전제 요건을 중심으로 -

황인복,신혜은 한국지식재산학회 2022 産業財産權 Vol.- No.72

Recently, artificial intelligence technology is causing a lot of issues throughout society. It was the case with AlphaGo, and the case of invention by artificial intelligence called DABUS is also the same. A distinction must be made between inventions made by artificial intelligence and inventions related to artificial intelligence. Inventions related to artificial intelligence can be sufficiently treated as ordinary inventions in the current patent law system if only a few characteristics are considered. The problem is inventions by artificial intelligence. Invention by artificial intelligence must change the existing system of ideas about the creative subject of the invention. Since creation by machines rather than humans must be acknowledged, philosophical issues that transcend legal issues are contemplated. Just as Alan Turing contemplated, it is only by answering the question of whether machines can think that an invention made by artificial intelligence can be recognized. However, we still haven't found the answer to whether machines can think. With the development of artificial intelligence technology, real mutual cooperation between humans and artificial intelligence becomes possible, and if it is not determined that an invention has been substantially contributed by artificial intelligence, it is not indicated even if it is an invention by artificial intelligence, but only a human inventor is applied for a patent this will increase. If a human inventor and a human-artificial intelligence co-inventor are treated at the same level without taking into account the difference in ability between humans and artificial intelligence, an invention bias can occur. Although it is not clear whether artificial intelligence can think, the number of situations in which artificial intelligence collaborates with humans to produce results will increase. In order to prepare for such a future situation, it is necessary to think about the relative judgment method for the recognition of the inventor of artificial intelligence. For recognition of an AI inventor, it is necessary to have a specific discussion that can distinguish the roles of AI into simple tools, simple assistants, co-inventors, and sole inventors by determining explainability, autonomy, and contribution. This becomes the starting point of problems throughout the patent system, such as inventor's right, inventor's mark, attribution of right to obtain a patent, joint application, method of writing detailed description, shared patent, and attribution of patent right. 최근 인공지능 기술이 사회 전반에 걸쳐서 많은 이슈를 불러 일으키고 있다. 알파고 사건도 그러했고, DABUS라는 인공지능에 의한 발명 사건도 그러하다. 인공지능에 의한 발명과 인공지능에 관한 발명은 구별되어야 한다. 인공지능에 관한 발명은 몇 가지 특성만 고려하면 현재의 특허법 제도에서도 통상의 발명으로 충분히 취급할 수 있다. 문제는 인공지능에 의한 발명이다. 인공지능에 의한 발명은 발명의 창작 주체에 대한 기존의 관념 체계를 바꾸어야 한다. 인간이 아닌 기계에 의한 창작을 인정해야 하기에 법률적 문제를 초월하는 철학적 문제까지 고민하게 된다. 앨런 튜링이 고민한 것과 마찬가지로 기계가 생각할 수 있을까에 대한 대답을 해야만 인공지능에 의한 발명을 인정할 수 있게 된다. 하지만, 아직도 기계가 생각할 수 있을까에 대한 답을 찾지 못하였다. 인공지능 기술이 발전하여 인간과 인공지능의 실질적 상호 협력이 가능해지고, 인공지능에 의해 실질적 기여가 이루어진 발명임에도 이를 판정하지 못하면, 인공지능에 의한 발명임에도 이를 표기하지 않고 인간 발명자만을 표기한 특허출원이 늘어날 것이다. 인간과 인공지능의 능력 차이를 고려하지 못하고 순수 인간 발명자와 인간-인공지능 공동 발명자를 같은 수준으로 취급하면 향후에는 인공지능에 의한 발명이 증가하는 발명의 쏠림 현상이 발생할 수 있다. 인공지능이 생각할 수 있을지 명확히 밝혀낼 수 없음에도 인공지능이 인간과 협업하여 결과물을 산출하는 상황은 늘어날 것이다. 이러한 향후 상황에 대비하기 위하여 인공지능 발명자 인정을 위한 상대적 판단 방법에 대한 고민은 필요하다. 인공지능 발명자 인정을 위해서 설명가능성, 자율성 및 기여도를 판단하여 단순 도구, 단순 보조자, 공동 발명자, 단독 발명자로 인공지능의 역할을 구분할 수 있는 구체적인 논의가 필요하다. 이는 발명자권, 발명자 표시, 특허를 받을 수 있는 권리 귀속, 공동 출원, 상세한 설명의 기재 방식, 공유 특허, 특허권 귀속 등 특허 제도 전반에 걸쳐 있는 문제의 시작점이 된다.

"승리자에게 새 예루살렘을 !"

황인복 교수 한일장신대학교 한국성경연구원 2001 설교자를 위한 성경연구 Vol.7 No.6

알코올효과에 대한 인지적인 기대가 음주행동에 미치는 영향

황인복,이민규,주경채 大韓神經精神醫學會 1993 신경정신의학 Vol.32 No.6

This study was conducted to assess the relationships between a person's expectation about the effects of alcohol and their drinking behavior. A questionaire inquiring the anticipated effects of alcohol was administered to 41 alcoholic male patients and 56 nonpatient male adults, including 45 subjects with drinking problems and 11 subjects with light drinkers. The questionaire showed that problem drinkers expected alcohol to enhance social pleasure more than did light drinkers and alcoholics. In the analysis of expectancy about alcohol's tension reduction effects, alcoholics expected alcohol to reduce their tension more than did light drinkers and problem drinkers. These results suggest that anticipated reinforcement influence people's drinking behavior, which then suggest that it may be more effective to explore personal expectancy of alcohol while assessing and treating alcohol related problems.

사회적 변화에 따라 정신질환자들의 피해망상 속에 나타난 박해자 유형변화

강승범,황인복,김한석,김승곤,김학렬,박상학,김상훈,황걸 朝鮮大學校 附設 醫學硏究所 2008 The Medical Journal of Chosun University Vol.33 No.3

Objective: The authors investigated the frequency of persecutors in persecutory delusions of the psychiatric patients who didn't undergo the arrest or traumatic injury, reside in Gwangju Jeonnam area, and were admitted to the hospital after the 5.18 prodemocracy movement in Gwangju in 1980 upward 10 years. Also this study investigated the frequency of the persecutors before and after the prodemocracy movement and in capital and Gwangju Jeonnam area. Subjects and Methods: Among the 896 patients who were admitted to department of psychiatry, Chosun University Hospital from Jan. 1. 1989 to Dec. 31. 1991, we choosed 144 patients with persecutory delusion who had lived in Gwangju Jeonnam area for 10 years after 5.18 prodemocracy movement as subjects. Persecutors were classified into 7 class: unspecified, family, neighbors, communist or spy, police or army or secret agent, impersonal, others. Results: 1) In our study, the frequency of persecutors was family, unspecified, neighbors, police or army or secret agent, impersonal, others, communist or spy in descending order. As compared to previous studies (1956-2003) including our study about frequency of persecutor at capital area and Gwangju Jeonnam area, and before and after 5.18 prodemocracy movement, 2) At capital area, in the early 1980s, police, family, neighbors, unspecified person was frequent in descending order. In the both of early 1970s, 1990s, neighbors, family, unspecified person, police was frequent in descending order. 3) At Gwangju Jeonnam area, in the early 1970s, family, unspecified person, neighbors, police was frequent in descending order. In the early 1990s, unspecified person and family, neighbors, police was frequent in descending order. 4) The police class was most frequent at capital area in the early 1980s. Conclusions: We suppose that class of persecutor in persecutory delusions of psychiatric patients are changing according to social change, and frequency of police class was decreasing in both of capital and Gwangju, Jeonnam area.

알코올 의존 환자의 수면 장애와 하지불안증후군

이문인,정홍주,김한석,황인복,신재정,강상범,윤우상,김상훈,Lee, Moon-In,Jung, Hong-Joo,Kim, Han-Sok,Hwang, In-Bok,Sin, Jae-Jung,Kang, Sang-Bum,Yun, Woo-Sang,Kim, Sang-Hoon 대한수면의학회 2010 수면·정신생리 Vol.17 No.1

1) 알코올 의존 환자에서 불면은 68.6%의 환자들이 호소하고 있는 중요한 치료적 목표 중 하나이다. 2) 알코올 의존 환자에서의 불면과 관련된 중요한 원인은 RLS(38.4%)와 이와 흔히 동반되는 PLMD(34.9%)였다. 3) 지속되는 RLS 증상은 환자의 수면의 질적 저하를 가져오며, 불안과 같은 정서에 부정적인 결과를 가져온다. 이에 알코올 의존 환자에서 수면관련 장애들에 대한 진단적 고려와 적극적인 치료적인 접근이 반드시 필요하다. Objectives: We review the sleep problems of the alcohol dependence patients. Especially we are interested in the prevalence, the severity of symptoms, anxiety, depression, and sleep quality of restless legs syndrome (RLS) in the alcohol dependence patients. Methods: We recruit 86 alcohol dependence patients who were admitted from October 6th, 2008 to October 17th, 2008. We interviewed each patient and evaluated sleep questionnaires such as the Sleep Disorder Questionnaire (SDQ), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) rating scale. The presence of RLS and its severity were assessed using the IRLSSG diagnostic criteria and the IRLSSG severity scale, respectively. Depression and anxiety were evaluated by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Beck anxiety inventory (BAI). Results: Of all 86 patients, 59 patients have insomnia, 33 patients have RLS, 30 patients have Periodic limb movement disorder (PLMD), 29 patients have nightmare. RLS patients have more high score in the BAI ($21.70{\pm}10.36$ vs $14.67{\pm}11.98$), and their sleep quality was poor in the PSQI ($11.09{\pm}4.08$ vs $7.92{\pm}3.91$) than non-RLS patients. Conclusion: This study shows that alcohol dependence patients show many sleep problems such as insomnia and RLS. So we should notice that the sleep problems of alcohol dependence patients are important in clinical approach and treatment.