http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
홍세일 영남이공대학 1996 論文集 Vol.25 No.-
The main purpose of this paper is to discuss the function of language, components of discourse, and the strategy of language use. In relation to the improvement of communicative competence in English education, grammar needs to be taught as the dynamic process to acquire the procedural linguistic knowledge. It is argued that a discussion of grammar from the viewpoint of context-sensitive discourse level is required. It is shown that because the relation of linguistic forms with its function in language use is variable and unpredictable without the given situation. a context-sensitive, discourse level approach to grammar is needed.
언어의 화용적 기능과 기능 문법의 타당성 : 2중 주어와 조사 "는"을 중심으로
홍세일 영남이공대학 1987 論文集 Vol.16 No.-
The purpose of this thesis is to prove the validity of the hypothesis that there is pragmatic level in every language, and to find the evidence of the pragmatic functions in English and Korean. Another purpose is to verify the possibility of the application of the pragmatic functions to the Korean "Double Subject Construction" with the result of proving the universally of Functional Grammar. By using the notions of theme and topic, the explanation of "Double Subject Construction" would he possible provided both of the two nominatives have "given information." The definition of "-nin" as a pragmatic function marker complements the imperfection of many hopotheses in which "-nin" is regarded as having the function of topic particle and the meaning of contrastiveness. In conclusion, it has been proved that the pragmatic functions suggested in Functional Grammar help us explain the pragmatic level of Korean, as well as of other languages.
홍세일 영남이공대학 1991 論文集 Vol.20 No.-
This study is an attempt to provide a close insight into the nature, meanig, and function of English discourse particle Well from the linguistic, social, and psychological points of view. Contrary to the common belief, many discourse analysts argue that speakers use discourse par tides as part of their conversational strategies to introduce what the speaker is about to say. Discourse particles serve to indicate the general frame of the topic to be taken up, as well as the various social, psychological and communicative signals used in the conversation. We have seen that discourse particles have a place-holding furction in the organization and differentiation of discourse. First, they allow the speaker time to organize upcoming information. Second, they mark units of upcoming information as subordinate or coordinate. This study shows us that discourse particles are not arbitrarily occurring 'performance' phenomena in language, but they are governed both by linguistic, and by communicative discourse constraints. It was found that discourse particles signal the participant's social context in the conversation. They may be used to signal a wish to take a turn in the conversation, to get another participart to answer, or to express a wish to end the conversation.
홍세일 영남이공대학 1989 論文集 Vol.18 No.-
This is a study of several common items in English conversation known variously as 'discourse particles.' 'interjections,' 'discourse markers,' and less respectfully as 'hesitations' or 'fillers'. The general program of the study is to examine several such discourse particles in detail and propose a theoretical framework in which their uses individually make sense and in which revealing comparisons can be made between them. Examination of discourse particles points up the fact that each individual participant in a conversation is aware that some thoughts are not disclosed and of the fact that conversants enter mctcrial selectively in the shared world. Although the private and other worlds are essentially inaccessible to the nonparticipant observer, their existence cannot be ignored-particularly since speakers themselves often acknowledge to each other, in a number of ways, the existence and importance of their own unexpressed thinking.
홍세일 영남이공대학 1988 論文集 Vol.17 No.-
The study of naturally occurring connected discourse, spoken or written is one of the promising and rapidly developing areas of linguistics. Traditional linguistics has concentrated on the analysis of single sentences or isolated speech acts. There are some of the limitations of contemporary linguistes and speech act theory which neglect key aspects of native speaker fluency and communicative competence. Language is used as a means of communication in human society, and we should research linguistic facts inductively on the basis of an empirical foundation and discourse-pragmatics. We surveyed the validity of discourse analysis by studying English passive construction.