http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
최문홍(Choi, Mun Hong) 한국오순절신학회 2011 오순절신학논단 Vol.- No.9
Although the heated debate among the Evangelicals and the Pentecostals on the issue of the essential nature of the Holy Spirit in Luke-Acts has been going on for last four decades or so, it seems that fundamental disagreement still lies on the cardinal issue,-i.e., the precise relationship between the Holy Spirit and salvation. This paper thus attempts to explore the relationship of the Holy Spirit to soteriology in Luke-Acts. As James Dunn argues, for Luke, the Holy Spirit is not directly associated with the concept of conversion-initiation. Our investigation of the passages-e.g., Jesus’ empowerment with the Holy Spirit at Jordan, and five major pericopes dealing with reception of the Holy Spirit in Acts—has demonstrated that the gift of the Holy Spirit is given to those who have already saved. It is also observed that, pace Max Turner’s claim, for Luke, salvation is not achieved by a process, but is instantly accomplished and closely related to “repentance,” and “the name of Jesus.” Besides, for Luke, the Holy Spirit comes upon a person not potentially, but objectively and observably. Our study has highlighted that reception of the Hoy Spirit is an objective and observable phenomenon through the analysis of five major section about receiving of the Holy Spirit in Acts. All these observations suggest that one cannot accept Turner’s “new pneumatological paradigm” which he set up on the basis of a potential pneumatology for Luke-Acts. In short, our study leads us to conclude that the position of the Pentecostal scholars is valid: i.e., the Holy Spirit in Luke-Acts is “empowering for witness” excludes the soteriological dimension.
최문홍 ( Choi Mun Hong ) 한세대학교 영산신학연구소 2008 영산신학저널 Vol.14 No.-
This study attempts to explore Rev. Yonggi Cho’s understanding of the Kingdom of God. Youngsan and the Kingdom of God are inseparable during fifty years of his ministry. This study is concerned with what aspect of Youngsan’s understanding of the Kingdom of God has affected the tremendous growth of Yoido Full Gospel Church. The thesis of this study is that Youngsan’s emphasis on a present aspect of the Kingdom has basically contributed to such growth. For him, the Kingdom of God, first of all, comes in the heart of believers, who become the people of the Kingdom of God. They can enjoy naturally the fruits of the Kingdom of God, which is “Fivefold Gospel” and “Threefold Blessing”. According to Youngsan, this is possible by “Fourth Dimension”. As such, the major elements of Youngsan’s theology are meaningfully connected to his understanding of the Kingdom of God.
최문홍 ( Choi Mun Hong ) 한세대학교 영산신학연구소 2015 영산신학저널 Vol.35 No.-
본 논문은 누가의 성령의 성격을 둘러싸고 아직 첨예하게 대립하고 있는 오늘날의 신약학계에 하나의 해결의 길을 모색하기 위하여 작성된 것이다. 그간의 대립은 주로 오순절주의자들(로버트 멘지스로 대표됨)과 비오순절주의자들(막스 터너로 대표됨) 사이의 열띤 논쟁의 양상을 띠었다. 터너는 누가의 성령은 우선적으로 ‘구원론적’으로 기능한다고 주장하였고, 멘지스는 오직 ‘증거를 위한 능력부여’라고 주장하였다. 그러나 본 논문은 누가에 나타난 성령은 한편으로 ‘구원’과는 무관하며, 다른 한편으로 오직 ‘증거를 위한 능력부여’도 누가의 성령론 전체를 포괄하기에는 충분하지 못함을 보여줄 것이다. 왜냐하면, 누가의 성령은 ‘증거’이외에 다양한 활동을 하시는 분으로 드러나기 때문이다. 본 논문은 예수의 약속(행 1:8)이 성취되는 과정에 있어 성령의 역할에 주목한다. 이 약속이 성취되는 과정에서 성령은 다양한 인격적 활동을 하시는 ‘신적 인격’으로 드러난다. 따라서 본 논문은 누가에 있어 성령은 단지 ‘증거를 위한 능력부여의 영’이라기 보다는 ‘신적 인격의 영’으로 보다 잘 이해되어질 수 있다고 결론지었다. This paper is written to breach a barrier among New Testament scholars which have been opposed sharply on Luke’s pneumatology. This confrontation assumes an aspect of the heated debates between the Pentecostals (represented by Robert Paul Menzies) and the non-Pentecostals (represented by Max Turner). Turner argues that the Spirit in Luke-Acts has firstly soteriological functions, while Menzies understands the Spirit in Luke-Acts simply as ‘empowering for witness’. This paper, however, claims that on one hand the Holy Spirit in Luke-Acts is not related with salvation, on the other hand ‘empowerment for witness’ is not enough for the whole Luke’s pneumatology. Because the Holy Spirit in Luke-Acts is seen as the one who performs various activities including witnessing. This paper focuses the Spirit’s role in the process of accomplishment of the promise of Jesus (Acts 1:8). The Spirit here appears as a ‘divine person’ who carries out diverse personal activities. This paper, therefore, came to the conclusion that Luke’s pneumatology is better understood as the ‘Spirit as a divine person’ rather than the ‘Spirit as simply empowerment for witness.’