現物給與의 課稅方案에 관한 硏究 : 현물급여의 과세방안에 관한 연구

이인재 釜山大學校 商科大學 1989 釜山商大論集 Vol.57 No.-

안전행정부 이인재 제도정책관 "정부 3.0"

이인재 한국공학교육학회(구 한국공학교육기술학회) 2013 공학교육동향 Vol.20 No.3

안전행정부 이인재 제도정책관 정부 3.0

이인재 한국공학교육학회 2013 Ingenium(人材니움) Vol.20 No.3

연재10. 연구자의 사회적 책임

이인재 한국피부과학연구원 2014 대한피부미용학회지 Vol.12 No.1

The domain of social responsibility of researcher is one of core areas of RCR instruction. In general,researchers have both individual and social responsibility. The former is related with honestly observing,recording and interpreting aspects of the data, using experimental methods to ensure objectivity, the honestuse of ideas of others. and respect for human participants and animal care in one’s research. The latter isrelated with expressing researcher’s responsibilities to society in many other ways such as choosing anresearch project that will likely provide important information for the good of society, alerting society to thebenefits and harms of the outcomes of studies in progress, to participate in the discussion of ethical issuesthat arise from a discovery and to help educate the public and policy makers about these issues that mayarise from the discovery. According to Singapore Statement on Research Integrity(2010), researcher’s socialresponsibilities include two dimensions. One is that researchers should limit professional comments to theirrecognized expertise when engaged in public discussions about the application and importance of researchfindings and clearly distinguish professional comments from opinions based on personal views. The otheris that researchers and research institutions should recognize that they have an ethical obligations to weighsocietal benefits against risks inherent in their work. I discussed two ways in which researchers can exercisetheir responsibilities to society such as conflicts of interest and expert’s witness.

연재2. 연구활동의 스펙트럼과 연구진실성

이인재 한국피부과학연구원 2012 대한피부미용학회지 Vol.10 No.3

The two main aims of this paper are as follows. One is to be understood what are three research behaviors which researchers can be encountering while proposing, fulfilling and reporting of research. The other is to be examined what is the research integrity, what is the relationship to the research ethics in relation to ethical research practice. Research integrity is defined it as that all researchers should obey in doing desirable research activities. It is not to be confused with research ethics. These two terms share some commonality, yet the main difference lies in substance. Research ethics usually pertains to issues related to the decisions about, or treatment practice of, humans in research. But research integrity deals with the question of truth and honesty in science, as well as complying with commonly accepted research practices beholden to the research community. The Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) represents the ideal standard institutions and individuals endeavor to meet and is conducting research in ways that fulfill the professional responsibilities of researchers.

4차 산업혁명 시대 초등 도덕교육에서 AI 윤리 무엇을 가르칠 것인가

이인재 한국초등도덕교육학회 2020 한국초등도덕교육학회 학술대회 Vol.2020 No.-

초등 도덕과 교육에서의 생명 윤리 교육

이인재 한국생명윤리학회 2008 생명윤리 Vol.9 No.1

생명윤리교육과 관련하여 볼 때, ‘무엇’을 가르칠 것인가의 문제(내용)에 대해서는 많은 논의를 하면서도 ‘어떻게’ 그것을 효과적으로 가르칠 것인가의 문제(교수ㆍ학습의 방법)에 대해서는 체계적인 연구와 적용이 뒤따르지 못했다. 생명윤리교육이 효과를 거두기 위해서는 학교 급별 학생들의 발달 수준과 가르쳐야 할 내용적 특성에 적합한 방법론이 마련되어야 하고, 관련 과목과의 유기적 연계 속에서 체계적으로 교육되어야 한다. 이를 위해서는 학생들이 적극적으로 생명윤리 문제에 참여하여 주도적인 학습을 할 수 있는 교수ㆍ학습 모형의 개발이 요구된다. 이러한 문제 인식을 가지고 본 논문에서는 초등학교 도덕과 교육에서의 생명윤리교육의 현황과 보완해야 할 점을 내용 및 방법적 측면에서 살펴본 후, 초등학생들이 생명윤리 문제가 갖는 복잡하고 풀기 어려운 도덕적 딜레마를 올바르고 합리적으로 판단하고 결정할 수 있도록 하기 위해 “또래 간 토론 수업”의 과정을 제시하였다. Concerning bioethics education, although it has been discussed enough 'what' to teach, systematic studies and applications have been hardly followed the matter 'how' to teach effectively (teaching-learning methods). To obtain the effects from bioethics education, its methods which are suitable for both students' developmental level of each school phase and traits of contents have to be arranged, and it has to be performed systematically in organized connection with its relative subject. For the sake of it, it demands to develop a teaching-learning model in which makes students possible to take part in bioethical issues actively and eventually take a leading role in learning process. With this critical mind, after examining the present statue and the weak points of bioethics education of elementary moral education in aspects of its contents and methods, this thesis presents the process of 'peer transactive discussion' in order that elementary school students may judge and decide rationally in solving perplexing ethical dilemmas of bioethics issues.

연재4. 중복게재

이인재 한국피부과학연구원 2013 대한피부미용학회지 Vol.11 No.1

There are so many researchers who don’t understand what is redundant publication and recognize it as one of serious research ethics violation. Researchers try to do redundant publication deliberately or unintentionally to increase the number of their research papers. The aims of this paper are to present what researchers must know and put it into practice to prevent redundant publication. To the end, this paper is focused on examination of the meaning, types and judgment criteria of redundant publication. Journals that view their purpose as including the reporting of original work generally insist that papers be submitted to them solely, not having been published before or not under consideration by any other journal. Violating this requirement by reporting substantially the same work more than once, without attribution of original sources, has been variously called redundant (duplicate, repetitive) publication. The redundant publication includes three types such as copying, salami-slicing, imalas publication. The definition of redundant publication raises the issue of how to recognize when 2 (or more) written reports are substantially the same. An all-inclusive, legalistic definition is probably not possible, although certain aspects or characteristics are usually evident on careful examination. At least 1 of the authors must be common to all reports. The subject or study populations are often the same or similar, the methodology is typically identical or nearly so, and the results and their interpretation generally vary little, if an all. The papers may differ in form but not in substance. To avoid the deliberate or undeliberate attempt for redundant publication, researchers should use proper amount of quotations, which means their work should not be filled with quotations. If one uses too many quotations or does not give credit in accordance with the accepted fair practices of the relevant research community in their creative work written on the basis of their own or another’s work, this constitutes redundant publication.

抗生物質 基準制定에 關한 調査硏究

李仁宰,鄭南朝,張映京,趙在天,金春子 國立保健硏究院 1975 국립보건연구원보 Vol.12 No.-

연재 9. 공동 연구

이인재 한국피부과학연구원 2013 대한피부미용학회지 Vol.11 No.6

The collaborative research is one of the nine core areas of RCR instruction that deals with issues investigatorsshould be aware of to conduct research responsibly. Collaborative research overlaps with many of the othercore areas of RCR instruction since instruction in the responsible conduct of research is integral to all researchendeavors. Research collaborations and issues that may arise from such collaborations include such as settingground rules early in the collaboration, avoiding authorship disputes, and sharing of materials and informationwith internal and external collaborating scientists. Collaborative research raises a number of different ethicalissues such as authorship, intellectual property, and interactions between academic institutions and privateindustry. Successful professional relationships and collaboration in research cannot occur without a high level ofcooperation, trust, collegiality, fairness, accountability. The challenge to researchers engaged in collaboration is aneed to understand what the project’s main goal is, and what role each collaborator must play in order to achievethat goal. Factors that can increase the likelihood of positive collaborative outcomes include: clearly delineatingroles and responsibilities, developing effective management plans, and fostering a high level of cooperation,developing trust, collegiality, and a profound sense of fairness and accountability.