호텔기업 비정규직구성원이 지각하는 심리적 계약위반 이 조직신뢰 및 상사신뢰에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 - 자기효능감을 조절변수로 -

이영록 ( Lee Young-lok ),김양숙 ( Kim Yang-suk ),김명희 ( Kim Myung-hee ) 한국호텔리조트학회(구 한국호텔리조트카지노산학학회) 2016 호텔리조트연구 Vol.15 No.4

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between the violation of psychological contracts of organizational members and organizational confidence through efficient and systematic human resources management to achieve the management goals of the hotel company. Additionally, we will examine the reliance on non-standard workers and human resource management of food service industry. First, this investigates the influence relationship between the violation of psychological contract of temporary employees, breach of transactional contract, and breach of relationship contract and organization confidence, supervisor confidence, and basic efficacy. Second, this verifies the effect of the psychological contract of temporary employees on the organization confidence. Third, this justifies the effect of the psychological contract of temporary employees on the superior confidence. Fourth, this demonstrates the regulation effect between the violation of psychological contract and the self-efficacy of temporary employees. A questionnaire had been used in this study with 400 temporary employees in 16 random hotels companies. The finding in this study represents that there is no relationship between organizational supports and temporary employees` job in the hotel industry. For the first reason, sub factors of the learning orientation, such as learning environment, vision sharing and openness of temporary employees, shows positive influence on job involvement and satisfaction. On the other hand, organizational supports indicate positive influence only to learning orientation and job involvement. Therefore, for temporary employees who affect by job involvement and satisfaction from learning orientation has no relationship with organizational supports.

소위 ‘사과법’(apology law)의 검토와 제안- 환자안전법 개정안(김상훈 의원안)에 부쳐 -

이영록(Lee, Young Lok) 충북대학교 법학연구소 2018 法學硏究 Vol.29 No.2

Ⅰ. 머리말 Ⅱ. 예비적 고찰 Ⅲ. 사과법의 정책적 효과 검토 Ⅳ. 사과법의 윤리적 검토 Ⅴ. 보론: 환자안전법 개정안 검토 Ⅵ. 제안: 위자료 제도의 활용 Ⅶ. 맺음말

제1공화국 헌법위원회제도의 형성 - 사법제도 형성의 한 단면 -

이영록(Lee Young-lok) 한국헌법학회 2005 憲法學硏究 Vol.11 No.2

The idea of Constitution Committee as stipulated in the Korean Constitution of 1948(so called 'Geonguk Constitution') was triggered by the introduction of the system of American judicial review, and completed by compromise with efforts to block it from being adopted. Such various conflicts were revealed in the process of making the Constitution Committee, as between legislature superiority and judicature superiority, separation-of-powers theory and legal stair theory(of H. Kelsen), and American legal thoughts and continental legal tradition. Especially, conflict of interests between legal circles and politicians lies in the core of them. The former supported judicial review system strongly from the start to the end, while the latter took a stand against it. Constituent Assembly legislators accepted the idea of Constitution Committee instead of judicial review system which a scholar, Yu, Jin-oh(兪鎭午) originally invented. But they changed the original form greatly, considering interests of legislature and judicature, and compromising both of them. Regretfully, the rationale of the system, that is protection of minority, was throughly disregarded by all of them in the process of the compromise. I think that it was why the Constitution Committee did not work efficiently during the First Republic period.

제헌국회의 '헌법 및 정부조직법 기초위원회'에 관한 사실적 연구

이영록(Lee Young-lok) 한국법사학회 2002 法史學硏究 Vol.25 No.-

호텔기업 비정규직 종업원들이 지각하는 조직냉소와 조직시민행동에 관한 연구

이영록(Lee Young Lok),전무경(Jeon Moo Kyeong) 대한관광경영학회 2017 觀光硏究 Vol.32 No.5

본 연구는 호텔기업 비정규직만을 대상으로 그들이 지각하는 조직냉소와 조직시민행동에 대해 심리적 주인의식, 자기효능감, 상대적 박탈감을 조절효과로 분석을 하였다. 호텔기업은 경영목표를 달성하기 위하여 좀 더 체계적이고 효율적 인적자원관리를 해야 할 것이다. 본 연구의 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 조직냉소와 조직시민행동(OCBI, OCBO)의 관계에서 심리적 주인의식, 자기효능감, 상대적 박탈감의 관계에 미치는 유의미한 차이를 규명하였다. 연구의 결과는 조직냉소와 OCBI간의 관계는 가설방향을 유지하였으나 통계적으로 유의하지 않게 검증되어 가설 1-1은 기각되었다. 심리적 주인의식과 자기효능감이 OCBI에 통계적으로 유의하였으며, 상호작용을 투입하였을 때는 자기효능감과 상대적 박탈감이 통계적으로 유의하였다. 하지만 자기효능감은 통계적으로 유의 하였으나 가설방향은 반대로 나타났으며, 상대적 박탈감은 가설방향과 통계적으로 모두 유의하게 나타났다. 또한 미미하지만 R²의 증감(1.0%)이 발생하여 조절효과는 있는 것으로 최종 검증되었다. 가설 4-1은 지지되었으며, 가설 2-1과 3-1은 조절효과가 없는 것으로 나타나 기각되었다. 마지막으로 조직냉소와 OCBO간의 관계는 통계적으로 유의하여 가설 1-2는 지지되었다. 따라서 호텔기업 비정규직 종업원은 심리적 주인의식과 자기효능감은 다소 있지만, 호텔기업에 정규직에 대해 상대적 박탈감이 있다는 결론이 나왔다. 이는 정규직에 비해 동등하지 못한 대우를 받는 것으로 나타났다. 호텔기업에서 비정규직도 정규직과 같은 동등한 대우를 받는다면 그들은 기업에 대해 충성심과 고객에 대한 태도도 향상될 것이며, 호텔기업은 경쟁력 있는 기업으로 고객에게 좀 더 양질의 서비스를 제공 할 것으로 생각된다. The purpose of this study is to analyze the organizational cynicism and organizational citizenship behaviors of the temporary hotel employees by adjusting the psychological ownership, self-efficacy, and relative deprivation. Hotel companies should do more systematic and efficient resource management to achieve their management goals. The results of this study are summarized as follows. The relationship between organizational cynicism and organizational citizenship behavior (OCBI, OCBO) revealed significant differences in the relationship between psychological ownership, self-efficacy and relative deprivation. The results of the study showed that the relationship between organizational cynicism and OCBI remained hypothetical but due to statistically insignificant, hypothesis 1-1 was rejected. Psychological proprietorship and self-efficacy were statistically significant in OCBI and self-efficacy and relative deprivation were statistically significant when interaction is added. However, the self-efficacy was statistically significant while the hypothesis was not, and the relative deprivation was statistically significant in both hypothesis and statistic. In addition, it was proved that there is a moderating effect because of the slight increase (1.0%) of R^2. Hypothesis 4-1 was supported, while Hypothesis 2-1 and 3-1 were rejected as having no control effect. Finally, Hypothesis 1-2 was supported by statistical significance of the relationship between organizational cynicism and OCBO. Therefore, it is concluded as although temporary hotel employees have some psychological ownership and self-efficacy, they have a sense of relative deprivation on hotel compared to regular employees. This is due to unequal treatment with regular workers. If non-regular workers in a hotel are treated equally as full-time workers, their loyalty to hotel and service attitude toward customers will be advanced and finally it leads hotel to provide better service to its customers than competitive companies.

행정소송제도의 도입과 형성

이영록(Lee, Young-Lok) 부산대학교 법학연구소 2007 법학연구 Vol.48 No.1

인권의 도덕적 기초에 대한 타자철학적 탐색

이영록(Young-Lok Lee) 충남대학교 법학연구소 2015 法學硏究 Vol.26 No.1

이 논문에서는 인권의 타당성은 어디서 유래하는가라는 질문에 대해 레비나스에 의존하여 ‘타자’(the Other)라는 답을 제시해 보고자 하였다. 즉 인권은 ‘나’의 인권 이전에 타자의 인권으로 이해되어야 함을 보이려 하였다. 특히 근대와 근대 이후를 대표하는 칸트와 로티의 입장과의 비교를 통해 레비나스의 대답이 그들과는 어떻게 다르며, 그것이 인권과 관련하여 제기되는 몇 가지 문제에 어떤 의미를 가지는지 설명해 보고자 하였다. 레비나스에 따르면 인권이란 타자와 대면하는 순간 감성으로 경험되는 타자의 무한성에 대한 일종의 트라우마에서 비롯된다. 그것은 타자의 절대적 개별성과 고유성에 대한 경험이다. 이 점에서 레비나스는 이성능력이라는 인간 보편의 속성을 통해 보편적 인권을 근거지우려고 한 칸트를 비판하였다. 로티 역시 이런 칸트 비판에 대해서는 레비나스와 같은 길을 갔다고 할 수 있다. 그러나 보편적 근거를 부정함으로써 로티에게서 인권은 문화적인 우연적 사실로 전락한 반면, 레비나스는 회피할 수 없는 타자의 권리에 대한 나의 ‘증언’을 통해 인권의 절대적이고 보편적인 타당성을 주장할 수 있었다. 인권의 발생에 대한 레비나스의 이런 입장은 법과의 관계에서 인권이 차지하는 위치와 역할에 대해서도 칸트나 로티와는 다른 이해에로 이끌었다. 칸트는 형식적 보편성의 이성법에서 인권의 보장을 보았고, 로티 역시 타자가 우리(we)와 평등한 지위를 회복할 때 인권의 문제가 해소된다고 보았다. 이에 반해 레비나스는 법은 인권에 필수불가결하면서도, 법 속에서는 필연적으로 타자의 개별성이 무시된다는 점에서 동시에 인권의 침해이기도 하다고 보았다. 정치와 법의 합리성에 갇히지 않고 타자를 염려함으로 끊임없이 법을 개선해 가는 것, 그것이 곧 인권의 역할이라고 보았던 것이다. Where does the validity of human rights originate? The answer which this paper proposed is the Other. Relying on the thought of Emmanuel Levinas, I tried to show that human rights should be understood as the rights of the Other before it appears as my rights. For this purpose, I compared E. Levinas’s understanding of human rights with the understandings of E. Kant and R. Rorty. According to Levinas, human rights originate from a kind of trauma that is immediately experienced through corporeal sensibility when one confronts the other. It can be expressed as the experience of the individuality and uniqueness of the Other. This thought leads Levinas to criticise Kant who founded human rights on the practical reason deemed to be the human essence. Rorty follows Levinas in this criticism. But Levinas"s idea fundamentally differs from Rorty"s, too. While Rorty understands human rights as just culturally congenial fact, Levinas still maintains that the human right has the universal validity through the I"s witness to the Other"s right. The Levinas"s understanding of human rights brings his different position from that of Kant and Rorty regarding the relation of human rights with law. Kant sees the guarantee of human rights in law of reason, and Rorty thinks that issues of human rights will end when persecuted others are equally treated as we. But Levinas claims that law itself is contrary to as well as necessary for human rights. It is because law necessarily violates the uniqueness of the Other due to its generality and abstraction. Levinas"s point is that the role of the human right is to constantly put legal system into question, caring for others.

일반논담 : 한말 외국인 대상 민사재판의 구조와 실태: 한성(부)재판소의 민사판결을 중심으로

이영록 ( Young Lok Lee ) 법과사회이론학회 2011 법과 사회 Vol.0 No.41

This article aims at revealing the structure and actual operation of foreigner-related civil trial in the period of the Great Imperial Korea. It focuses on judgements of Hanseong Court and, if necessary, Godeung Court(or Peongriwon) as its higher court. The facts here revealed are as follows. 1. There was a case in which, even though a foreigner was in the position of the defendant, Korean court exercised jurisdiction over him. It was possible, perhaps because he was a co-defendant with a Korean. Even if so, it was a exception to the principle of defendant-ism upon the consular jurisdiction in that period, which meant that the country should have jurisdiction when its nationals were defendants in a case between different nationals. 2. There was also found a case in which Korean government exercised jurisdiction over a foreigner in the position of the defendant whose country was out of treaty relation with Korea. It has been known so far that even nationals of the country in non-treaty relation were protected by the consular jurisdiction of the third party nation. The case was related with a Chinese, taking place in June of 1896 after the treaty between China and Korea had expired, and before the new treaty was concluded. At least until then, chinese people in Korea were not protected by English consular jurisdiction. It means that when the chinese started to be protected by English consular jurisdiction should be corrected. 3. Political and diplomatic considerations had much influences upon foreignerrelated trials. It was reflected in the numbers of cases, the rate of foreigners` winning a case, etc.

개항기 한국에 있어 영사재판권

이영록(Lee, Young-Lok) 한국법사학회 2005 法史學硏究 Vol.32 No.-

조선시대 민사법원(法源)과 법개념 - 조선시대 민사법원의 개념화를 위하여 -

이영록(Lee, Young-Lok) 동아대학교 법학연구소 2020 東亞法學 Vol.- No.88

이 글에서 나는 전근대 조선의 민사법원(法源)을 관인법(官人法)이라는 용어로 개념화할 것을 제안하고, 그 성격과 특징을 서술하고자 하였다. 관인법은 관인들의 의식 속에 살아있는 법으로서 구체적인 사건에서 판결에 의해 비로소 발견되는 법이다. 그것은 도덕과 분리되어 규칙으로 작용하는 엄격한 의미에서의 법은 아니었다. 그러나 개별 사안마다 어느 정도 관인들 사이에서 공유된 시비 판단의 준거로서 구속적 성격을 갖는다는 점에서는 법이라고 충분히 부를 만한 것이었다. 그런 점에서 재판관의 자의나 순전히 당사자의 합의에 기초하는 조정의 결과와는 구분되어야 함을 강조했다. 이 점은 조선민사령의 가장 근본적인 법사적 의의가 단순히 법원(法源)의 변화에 그치는 것이 아니라, 법 개념 자체의 변환에 있음을 말해 준다. 법의 근대화 이식 과정에서 나타나는 근대적 내용의 성문법과 전통에 근거한 관습법이라는 표면적 이중구조를 넘어서 사법(司法)과 법문화를 급진적으로 변화시킨 근본적인 요인이기 때문이다. I tried in this paper to propose the term ‘official’s law’ to conceptualize the source of civil law in Chosun Dynasty, and to explain what characteristics and distinctiveness it had, and how it worked as law. Official’s law meant the law which was living in consciousness of officials as judges, and was found at the moment of, and by judgments in individual cases. It was not law in the strict meaning in which law worked as rules. Nevertheless, it was qualified to be called as law in the broader meaning in that it carried binding force in each case as shared criteria of right and wrong among officials. In that respect, it was different from judge’s ad hoc, or concilliation which based on agreement of both parties. It enabled us to see that the deeper significance of Chosun Civil Ordinance(1912) lied in the change of the conception of law rather than sources of law. It was the radical factor that was at the roots of the ostensible double structure of legal sources, i.e., the coexistence the written law with modern contents, and customary law based on tradition.