실내체육관에서의 공기오염에 관한 연구

윤승욱,김윤신,이종대,이철민,조용성 한국환경보건학회 2000 한국환경보건학회지 Vol.26 No.3

Nowadays, a new word called SBS(sick building syndrome) has been come into existence. At the point of time when an interest about indoor air pollution and, according to this, countermeasure plan are internationally. Moreover institutional countermeasure should be attended at national level since indoor air quality in public places where many people gather is directly connected with national health. Especially indoor pollution of indoor stadia where all sorts of sports are held can give rise to every kinds of respiratory ailments to players as well as audiences. So it is presented as a main factor that indoor space of stadia is crowded with players and audiences compared with other kinds of indoor space. Therefore, in this research to analyze pollution degree of indoor circumstance for gymnasium and exercising room of folk wrestling. basketball, judo, wrestling, hapkido, swordsmanship and boxing making indoor gymnasium and exercising room an object, when 7 items were measures such as thermocircumstance(temperature, relative humidity, air current, intensity of illumination), dust, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide being based on the indoor environmental standard of the first clause of Article 45 of public utilization service which is showed at public hygiene of the Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, it was showed that indoor temperature, relative humidity, air current and intensity of illumination were over standard amount at the most of folk wrestling gymnasium and exercising room. Indoor density of carbon monoxide was preserved to the extent of standard amount (10ppm) at all gymnasiums but carbon dioxide was not in excess of standard amount(1,000 ppm) at most of gymnasiums. Indoor density of dust induced from respiration exceeded the standard amount (150㎍/㎥) at all gymnasiums of the folk wrestling. Since the folk wrestling players and participants feel physical subjective symptom seriously, in other words the degree of indoor air pollution at gymnasiums and exercising rooms of the folk wrestling is very high, fundamental solution and countermeasure plan should be presented.

新株引受權에 관한 考察

尹勝郁 건국대학교 1988 論文集 Vol.26 No.1

The current legal system is faced with the formidable challenge of effectively dealing with complex changes in the Korean social, political, and economic environments as the nation struggles to become a modern industrial democracy. Although Korean commercial law has been patterned after the Japanese model of law, there are many difficult problems in Korea which are not effectively dealt with by existing law. Thus, the comparative study undertaken here is significant because of the need to understand legal theories and practices in entirely different countries. Because this study is mainly concerned with legal doctrine of preemptive right as a valuable device in providing shareholder protection in Korea. The preemptive right of the corporate shareholder allows a shareholder to maintain his proportionate interest in voting power, earning, and assets of a corporation through the right to subscribe to new issues of shares in proportion to the number of shares he holds of the outstanding stock in the corporation prior to the issuance. The doctrine of preemptive right is generally applicable only to stock issued for cash because of the commercial necessity for freedom of action on the part of the directors in the management of corporation. Preemptive right apply to newly authorized issues of both voting and nonvoting stock, but if the issue is of previously authorized the cases are in conflict. As observed in this study, therefore, there is considleerable confusion as to the nature of preemptive right. Currently, even though their usefulness could not be essily over looked since section 418 of Commercial Code provides preemptive right, it is very important to point out that specific authorization for their use may be made in the articles of incorporation. The purpose of this study is twofold. Firstly, to discuss the statutory framework of preemptive right as the docitrine applies to varying share structures and d凉erring methods employed in share issuance. Secondly, to investigate appropriate practices with particular emphasis on problems of shareholder in Korea. This study seeks to clarify the Issues that have emerged in controversy over the implications of preemptive right. Upon clarification of these issues, the study attempts to reconcile the conflicting points of view and to suggest an interpretation which helps synthesize the two theories into a more useful theoretical framework of preemptive right. This study pointed out the majore factors which have created many problem in providing shareholder protection. An attempt is made to show how inadequate the present legal framework are for this purpose, following which a solution is proposed, and how this solution can be implemented from a legal, and practical viewpoint is then discussed. Finally, the author concludes that section 418 of the Korean Commercial Code has made no discernible impact for good. It is shown that section 418 of the Korean Commercial Code has deficiency since it does not provide adequate standard and controls. In many countries this resulted in legistlation considerably modifying the right of preemption.

株式會社 監事制度에 關한 硏究

尹勝郁 건국대학교 1986 論文集 Vol.23 No.1

This study is poi--g to deal with the problems concerning with Auditor System in Joint Stock Company (JSC), Nowadays auditing system is very important in JSC, because auditing system keeps the profit of stockholders, bondholders and the person concerned with Company. The Auditing Systems of JSC are composed with Auditor, Board of -directors, General Meeting of stockholders, Inspector, Stockholders, internal and external auditors. Among them, auditor is the core in the auditing systems. This study is composed with five chapters. In the first chapter is the Introduction to the audition system. In the second chapeter is the foreign law examined to group for the desirable model. In the third chapter are the Auditing Systems in the Commercial Code revised recently. In the fourth chapter are the theretical problems of the Auditor System in the Commercial Code. Finally Conclusion is added. In the second chapter, the legislation of Germany, England, America, and Japan that has exercised a direct effect upon our Auditor System is analyzed. On the Auditor Systems of these Countries the problems on the organization, duties and the competence of Auditor will be observed. In the third chapter, the Auditing Systems in our Commercial Code revised recently are observed. Among the Auditing Systems In the Commercial Code, those of JSC are representative. In the fourth chapter, the basic problems of the Auditing Systems are theoretically analyzed in detail. Next the effectiveness and the problems of the current Auditor System are surveyed. In conclusion, the current Commercial Code is progressive in the following that the legal position of the Auditor is strengthened and his responsiblity is consolidated. In order to make the overall auditing systems work out successfully, however, the auditor who is strengthened by the revised Commercial Code should work sincerely.

다시점 동영상의 계층적 깊이영상 기반 표현, 부호화 및 중간 시점 보간 기법

윤승욱,호요성 에스케이텔레콤 (주) 2007 Telecommunications Review Vol.17 No.6

최근 다양한 형태의 멀티미디어를 이용한 새로운 응용분야와 고품질 콘텐츠가 나타면서 사용자들은 한층 향상된 실감나는 서비스를 즐길 수 있게 되었다. 그 중에서도 다시점 동영상은 여러 시점에서 다수의 카메라로부터 획득된 정보를 이용하여 사용자에게 원하는 시점의 영상을 제공할 수 있는 장점이 있다. 따라서 차세대 서비스인 삼차원 TV, 자유시점 TV, 실감방송 등에 사용될 중요한 실감형 멀티미디어로 각광을 받고 있다. 그러나 다시점 동영상은 카메라 수에 비례하여 데이터양이 늘어나므로, 이를 다양한 응용분야에서 효율적으로 사용하기 위해서는 다시점 동영상의 효과적인 표현, 처리, 복원 기법을 개발하는 것이 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 영상기반 렌더링 기법 중에서 계층적 깊이영상의 개념을 이용하여 다시점 동영상을 효과적으로 표현, 처리, 복원하고, 복원된 시점 사이를 보간하는 방법을 제안하였다. 제안한 방법은 다시점 동영상을 삼차원 정보가 포함된 계층적 깊이영상의 개념을 이용해 나타냄으로써, 다시점 색상과 깊이정보를 구조적으로 표현한다. 이렇게 표현한 데이터를 데이터 모으기와 계층채우기 기법을 이용해 처리하고, 이를 구성요소별로 부호화하여 데이터양을 감소시킨다. 기존의 다시점 동영상 부호화 기법은 원본 시점의 복원을 목적으로 하며, 중간 시점 보간을 위해서는 영상 사이의 정합정보를 계산하는 독립적인 알고리즘 및 모듈이 필요하다. 하지만 제안한 방식은 다시점 동영상 데이터를 새로운 표현으로 변환함으로써 별도의 모듈 없이 부호화와 중간 시점 보간 기능을 동시에 제공하는 장점이 있다.

法人格否認論에 관한 考察

尹勝郁 건국대학교 1999 학술논문집 : 건국대 대학원 Vol.49 No.1

새로운 매체로서의 웹 캐스팅에 대한 고찰

윤승욱 동서언론학회 2000 동서언론 Vol.4 No.-

韓國의 産業民主化와 勞使關係

尹勝郁 청주대학교 경상대학 1981 經商論叢 Vol.22 No.-

消費者保護法의 特殊性과 消費者의 權利實現에 관한 考察

尹勝郁 건국대학교 1998 학술논문집 : 건국대 대학원 Vol.46 No.1

Economic life should be operated in harmony with both production and consumption activities, and the good balance of the two actives can be inevitable for the effective development of an industrial society. In particular an emphasis puts on the consumption actives with the protection of consumers according to the industrial development, because the industrial society can be threatened when the relationship between consumers and producers is unbalanced. In this respect, consumers resulted from the growing economic society and began to be stressed with increasing consumption in the economic development. Consumer problem, therefore was emerged from the beginning of capitalism in the 18th century· The consumer protection drive originally England in December, 1844. In early 20th century, such protection movements were developed in america under slogan of " A Great Social Discover" It indicates that the consumer drive can be grown more vigorously in the changing mass consumption age. Accordingly, both workers' and consumers' movements must be a by-product of the capitalism society. The emergence of massive workers had begun with the mass production of commodities in modem society. Meanwhile the social significance of consumers began with the increasing gap between the pl()diction and consumption in the mass production society. Such phenomenon happened in early 20th century and the consumers' movement is called "a discovery of the 20th century". In short, it is expected that the consumer protection will be greatly stressed in approaching the mass consumption era. Therefore, in this paper, 1 studied about Speciality of Consumer Protection Act & Realization of Right fur Consumer. Ⅰ.Instruction Ⅱ.Perception and Speciality of Consumer Protection Act 1.Notion of Consumer Protection Act 2.Peculiarity of Consumer Protection Act Ⅲ.Right for Consumer 1.General Idea of Consumer 2.Necessity about Protection for Consumer Ⅳ.Basic Direction of legislation fur coming true rights of Consumer 1.Legislatic Arrangement 2.Judical Disposure & Settlement 3.Administration Conduction 4.Organization for mutual relation between Consumer and Business Operation and self Regulation of Enterpriser Ⅴ.Improvement of information for Consumer and Education about Consumer Ⅵ.Conclusion

Preparation and Swelling Behavior of Biodegradable Hydrogels based on α,β-Poly(N-2-hydroxyethyl-D,L-aspartamide)

윤승욱,김지훙 한국고분자학회 2002 한국고분자학회 학술대회 연구논문 초록집 Vol.2002 No.10

換어음의 引受에 관한 고찰

尹勝郁 건국대학교 1997 학술논문집 : 건국대 대학원 Vol.45 No.1

At the present time, Bill & Cheqe act of world is derided system of united law made by Jeneva united treatise and that of Angro & American law. System of united law uniformed that of continental law, especially it consumed colour of German law. Korean Bill &Cheque law legislated after system of united law. System of united law permitted only acceptance of bill of exchange, but Angro 7: American law has not provisions prohibiting acceptance of cheque. Therefore acceptance of bill of exchange existed only in system of continental law. In this paper along order of description. 1 summarized following contents. First, acceptance means legal action about bill of exchange that payer of bill burden his debt. And acceptance is a juristic act that guarantor charge cash of bill, it make sure of payment for developing credited in commercial deal and existed only in bill of exange that is credit securities. After payer accepted bill of exchange, he become debtor, hendforth a claim for payment of bill surly is happened by his juristic act. There are two theories about nature of law in acceptance. One is theore rerarded as contract of act, the other is theore rerarded as act of independence. Since acceptor charge his debt as thought of accepting a bill, effect of acceptance is similar by virture of two theories. Second is explanation about preceding resentment for acceptance. Presentment for acceptance means that owner of bill of exchange or simple occupant furnish bill payer and demand payment. Theoritically acceptance is established without prior acting for acceptance but usually is established by presentment (for acceptance. Accordingly presentment for acceptance existed for the sake of acceptation. Owner of bill must be secured his right capable of presentment far acceptance for the good circulation of bill. Third is method of accptance. There are proper and informal acceptance. Following explanation is proper acceptance. In times of acceptation, ete equal meaning(acceptance writing) and payer must sign or put down inscrption on acceptance writings which payer charges his debt(cash of bill). As for acceptance writings, those are indifications payer charges his debt. Necessarily acceptor himself need not register, already printed writings, which is regarded as the thought of acceptor. Hence acceptance writings are not absolutely demanded conditions. Acceptance is established by player's singing simple signature or inscription on the bill. That is informal acceptance. Simple acceptation means method of acceptance expressed contents of bill. Non-simple acceptance is transformed acceptance which payer notes items of bill or restricted additionals. Because non-simple acceptance is regarded, as refusal of acceptance, possessor of bill has right of sue for payer of bill. Fourth is about erasure of acceptance. when acceptor sign his own inscription or signature, effect of acceptance happen. After acceptor has done his signature and return it to payer effect of acceptance happen. Although payer signed nothing of acceptance(signature or register), he cannot efface privately. Providing effacement of it, in this case, it regarded as refusal of acceptance. The fifth is explanation refiring effect of acceptance. If payer accept the bill, he must charge his debt(cash bill) in maturity of bill. In the case of acceptance established by many people, each one must charge his payable obligation. This is not joint obligation but union responsibility. If payer gives presentment one of acceptors, effect don't happen to the other acceptors. What acceptor burden his debt is same as liabilities of drawer of a bill. Obligation of acceptor is primarily liability. On the bill of exchange, it is unqualified, absolutely and consequent obligation.