「추등잡필(秋等雜筆)」에 나타난 풍자와 그 구조적 의미

박성필 이상문학회 2010 이상리뷰 Vol.- No.8

비젼 검사 장비에서 IR필터를 이용한 결함의 정밀측정

박성필,박종현,장재훈,고경철,고국원 제어로봇시스템학회 2014 제어로봇시스템학회 국내학술대회 논문집 Vol.2014 No.5

Arbitral action and preventive methods against predatory journal practice

박성필,이용중,Ji Hee Suh 한국과학학술지편집인협의회 2018 Science Editing Vol.5 No.1

As open access model of journal publication increases, predatory journals, which deceive scholars to publish journals in fake database websites and exploit them for publishing fee, is also increasing. There are two types of predatory journals. First, journal hijacking and cybersquatting generally create fake database website by mimicking authentic database website, thereby defrauding scholars for publication fee. Second, journal phishing use scam emails to steal scholars’ personal information. If scholars suffered damage from predatory journals, scholars can take either arbitral or judicial actions. Arbitral action follows arbitrational resolution process termed Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy. Scholars can join Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy proceeding with legal entity that has right to authentic database website, which will result in cancellation or transfer of fake database website. In contrast, scholars can take judicial action under Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which may help scholars to recover an actual monetary damage from predatory journals. Nonetheless, taking precaution to avoid predatory journals is the best course of action, rather than going through arduous cure procedures. Scholars may prevent predatory journals by carefully examining fake database website names or email addresses, or observing unreasonable number of published article issues in predatory journal websites.

How should medical researchers respond to false copyright infringement claims?

박성필,이용중 한국과학학술지편집인협의회 2019 Science Editing Vol.6 No.2

Serious concerns have been raised about the Morisky Medication Adherence Scales (MMAS-4 and MMAS-8) ever since researchers from Asia and other regions were claimed to have used the MMAS without a license. Donald Morisky and his team have claimed that numerous authors have infringed copyright, trademark, or other rights over the MMAS. This case study will scrutinize whether the MMAS is protected by any intellectual property rights, including copyright and trademark. In many cases, the authors have not applied the MMAS for their research, but have only introduced or described the MMAS in papers that are accessible and open to the public. The MMAS is a measure to keep track of and check the regularity and accuracy with which patients take their medications; it is not meant as a diagnosis and does not form a basis for treatment plans. If another researcher rephrases the questions in a way that achieves a certain level of originality, not infringing the original expressions of the MMAS, then Morisky and his team may not be able to claim infringement of its copyright. Even assuming that the MMAS is subject to copyright, the authors can raise a “fair use” defense. Concerted actions may be necessary for researchers to protect academic integrity and the public nature of scholarly works. The fair use of the MMAS in a scholarly article should not be barred by false copyright infringement claims.

Harmonizing Public and Private International Law: Implications of the Apple vs. Samsung IP Litigation

박성필 (사) 이준국제법연구원 2014 Journal of East Asia and International Law Vol.7 No.2

IP litigations over mobile digital devices are soaring in many jurisdictions. Based on the observation that the same or closely related infringement claims over the IP rights embedded in a single digital product have been raised in multiple jurisdictions, some literature and legislative proposals suggest that an international jurisdiction over such litigations are necessary. This article aims to explore practical roadmaps to establish public international “conflict of laws” that can serve administering IP dispute resolution among MNCs. The author will start by reviewing both public international laws on IPRs including the Paris Convention, PCT, the Geneva Convention, the TRIPs, and their private counterparts. Institutional aspects of the WTO and the WIPO administering such as public international IP laws will also be examined. Agreeing with the proposed idea of establishing ‘public’ private international IP laws, this article will propose a more practical roadmap to establish time and cost efficient IP dispute resolution mechanism: the IP5 Collaboration Model.

The Coordinating Role of Public International Law: Observations in the Field of Intellectual Property

박성필 (사) 이준국제법연구원 2016 Journal of East Asia and International Law Vol.9 No.2

The recent surge of multijurisdictional IP disputes and increase in non-binding soft laws have made scholars cast doubt on the sustainability of public international law and the validity of the current IP legal system. Private lawyers may now think that they do not have to pay keen attention to public international law any longer when providing legal advice to their clients, particularly MNCs. This study makes a concise description of today’s legal environment in the field of IP, focusing on the emerging legal norms of transnational law, particularly in the context of its interplay with public international law. With respect to this, the ongoing and even heightened roles of public international law will be discussed. Finally, a typology is suggested using exponents to express intensity of State sovereignty to facilitate understanding on the relationship between public international law and other categories of law.

오픈 이노베이션 전략의 법적 함의 - SCO 대 IBM 소송을 중심으로 -

박성필,김용길 한국지식재산연구원 2013 지식재산연구 Vol.8 No.4

“Open Innovation” is an industry buzzword today. It is becominga prerequisite for a firm’s survival and growth, especially in the ITindustry. Free/Open Source Software (“FOSS”) movement is differentfrom Open Innovation in terms of its origin and philosophicalfoundation. But it also should be noted that more and more companiesembedded with the Open Innovation concept are now actively utilizingFOSS to make the most of their product value. Furthermore, HenryChesbrough’s Open Innovation model itself contains an element thatrequires participation of FOSS developers and labels them as“innovation missionaries.” The FOSS community is also experiencinglimitless collaboration opportunities with commercial softwaredevelopers and increase in relevant licensing guidelines. IBM, as a leading hardware and software company in the globalmarket, is located at the harmonization point where the OpenInnovation strategy and the FOSS movement can be merged. Weexamined IBM’s Open Innovation strategy and SCO’s legal battleagainst this company, so that we can obtain practical implications onhow to analyze complex legal issues arising out of such disputes andobtain valuable lessons for entrepreneurs and legal experts working fortechnology driven IT enterprises. The litigation between SCO and IBM,which is still pending before the Utah federal court, challenges us todesign appropriate strategy options for innovation leaders that can potentially be involved in IP litigations which are becoming more andmore complicated in case software products would become keycomponents of the dispute. This paper tried to review and explainfactual background, procedural history, courts’ analyses on FOSS issues,litigation strategies, and IP portfolio management practices found in thecourse of this litigation. 오늘날 IT 산업을 중심으로 오픈 이노베이션은 기업의 생존과 성장을 위한 선택이 아닌 필수불가결의 전략으로 자리매김하고 있다. 한편 공개 소프트웨어 운동은 오픈 이노베이션과 그 기원 및 접근방법에서 본질적인 차이가 있지만, 최근 오픈 이노베이션 전략을 채택한 기업들 중 상당수가 공개 소프트웨어를 활용하고 있으며, 오픈 이노베이션의 기본 모델 자체를 자신의 모델의 중요한 일부로 여기고있다. 공개 소프트웨어 진영에서도 상업적 목적의 소프트웨어 업체들과도 협력하는 사례가 지속적으로 증가하면서 이를 뒷받침하는 라이센싱 규약들이 개발되어왔다. 세계 굴지의 하드웨어 기업으로서, 최근 소프트웨어 중심의 혁신을 주도하고 있는 IBM은 이러한 오픈 이노베이션과 공개 소프트웨어 운동이 어떻게 조화될 수 있는지 보여주는 대표적인 기업이다. 본고는 IBM의 오픈 이노베이션 전략,그리고 SCO와의 소송 관련 법적 쟁점과 그 시사점들을 분석하였다. 아직까지 종결되지 않은 이 소송은 IBM과 같이 오픈 이노베이션을 주도하는 기업들이 지식재산권 분쟁에 휘말릴 경우 문제될 수 있는 법적 쟁점들을 보여주며, 그에 대한적절한 대응전략을 모색할 수 있게 해 주는 좋은 사례이다. 이에 따라 본고에서는SCO 대 IBM 소송의 사실관계와 절차적 진행과정, 논점별 정리를 통해 공개 소프트웨어의 다양한 관점과 효율적인 소송전략, 지식재산 포트폴리오 관리의 중요성 등을 분석하였다.

未堂의 初期詩에 나타나는 ‘抑壓’의 精神病理學的 特徵

박성필 한국어문교육연구회 2009 어문연구(語文硏究) Vol.37 No.3

Though this study makes a searching examination with its Aesthetic property by sympathizing with an aspect of the suppression to appear in the early poems of Mi-dang through a psychopathology expression anniversary, there is the purpose of the discussion. Especially space- metaphor in early poems exposes to opening and confinement at once, but it related to sexual oppression or the senses by direct or indirect way. Therefore this study attention to repression in space-metaphor, we considerate the origin of poem and in-direct association to sensation. This study pays attention to `suppression' emerging in space metaphor, and understand the poetic origin, it is such a reason to be going to consider the problem of the sense and an aspect divided by the person in charge. In what it is minute, and is inspected in the ground that a pathology college register approach in poems of Mi-dang which a precedent study was not slightly enough for is objective, I hope that this article shows a characteristic in charge of Mi-dang sign a little more vividly and can prepare a new guidepost for study about Mi-dang. 이 硏究는 未堂 徐廷柱의 初期詩에 나타나는 ‘抑壓’의 양상을 精神 病理의 發顯 기제를 통해 살핌으로써 그 美的 特質을 糾明하는 데 論議의 目的이 있다. 특히 開放性과 幽閉性을 동시에 드러내는 初期詩의 독특한 空間 메타포는 空間에 대한 詩的 話者의 感覺을 比喩的으로 드러낸 것이지만, 性的 抑壓이나 官能 등 感覺의 문제들과 直․間接的으로 關聯되며, 고유의 美的 特質을 만들어내고 있다는 점에서 새롭게 주목할 만하다. 本稿가 空間 메타포에 드러나는 ‘抑壓’에 주목하여 그 詩的 起源을 살피고, 感覺의 문제와 관련되는 양상을 고찰하고자 하는 것은 그러한 이유에서이다. 先行硏究에서 다소 미흡하였던 未堂 詩의 病理學的 接近을 客觀的인 論據로 세밀하게 검증함으로써, 未堂 詩世界의 特質을 좀 더 선명하게 드러내며 未堂 硏究에 새로운 里程標를 마련할 수 있기를 기대한다.

金起林 詩에서 感受性과 詩的 이미지의 相關性

박성필 한국어문교육연구회 2008 어문연구(語文硏究) Vol.36 No.3

This study aims at examining the correlation between sensitivity and poetic images focusing on Kim Ki-Rim's poetry. Kim configures in a unique poetic technic susceptibility caused by the shock from accepting modern city culture, underlying which the feeling of ‘pent-up anger' resides. While studies on Korean modernistic poetry have generally paid attention to pictorial characteristics or poetic images, they have paid little attention to susceptibility by which those characteristics and images are configured. As one of the critical considerations of such approaches, Here I compares the feeling of ‘pent-up anger' with the process of the appearance of depression in order to explain the susceptibility related to Kim's creating his poets. Through this consideration, it is revealed that what triggered his depressional susceptibility was caused by his negative recognition on modernization. Such perception of Kim's is correlated closely with poetic configuration and this study points out first automatic thinking and distorted configuration of modern images presented in his poetry. 이 연구의 목적은 韓國 모더니즘 詩에서의 感受性과 詩的 이미지의 相關性을 金起林의 경우를 중심으로 고찰하는 데 있다. 金起林은 近代 都市文化 受容의 衝擊으로 인한 感受性을 독특한 詩的 技法으로 形象化하고 있는데, 그 기저에는 ‘鬱火’의 感情이 자리하고 있다. 韓國 모더니즘 詩에 관한 연구들은 繪畵的 特性이나 詩的 이미지에 注目하였던 것에 반하여, 그러한 形象化 方式에 介入되어 있는 感受性에는 별반 주목하지 않았다. 본고는 그러한 연구경향에 대한 비판적 검토의 일환으로, 金起林의 詩 創作에 개입되어 있는 感受性을 해명하기 위해 ‘鬱火’의 感情을 憂鬱症의 發顯科程과 比較하여 살피고자 하였다. 이러한 검토를 통하여, 金起林의 詩的 認識은 詩的 形象化 方式과 밀접한 相關性을 갖고 있음을 보였다. 특히, 본고에서는 金起林 시에서 엿보이는 自動的 思考, 近代 이미지의 歪曲된 形象化를 우선적으로 지적하고 있다.

그록스터(GROKSTER)判決에 나타난 誘導侵害理論의 示唆點

박성필 중앙법학회 2006 中央法學 Vol.8 No.4

The series of conflicts between copyright owners and technology developers over the P2P network is often referred to as a war these days. The U.S. Supreme Court's Grokster decision in 2005 has opened a new stage for fights between both sides. On the one hand, Grokster decision, by its newly introduced theory of inducement, equipped the copyright owners with a useful weapon to fight against infringers. On the other hand, Grokster decision cannot be said to be a complete victory of copyright owners. Of course, copyright owners will continue to file lawsuits against P2P network developers based upon either the traditional indirect liability theory or the newly adopted inducement theory. The lower courts will have to derive workable standards from Grokster decision. P2P technology developers, however, will eventually find alternatives to avoid infringement claims sooner or later, although it will entail inefficiencies and have the developers incur redundant expenses. Grokster decision, and its inducement theory, is a two-edged sword in that sense. Grokster decision has many implications to how Korean technology developers and copyright owners will adapt to the new digital environment, since this country cannot be exempt from the digital copyright warfare. The elements which Grokster decision had rigorously reviewed may give us hints to establish reasonable standards for the benefit of both groups. The battle over Soribada's file sharing service is a good example of digital copyright disputes in Korea. Recently, copyright owners have claimed that a positive filtering system needs to substitute Soribada's current negative filtering system. In the view of Grokster, the lack of content filtering system, or not adopting stronger positive filtering system, may show the intent of the P2P developers to induce copyright infringements. However, the defects of the filtering technology, high cost to develop one, and technical manipulations to avoid filtering may significantly weaken the effectiveness and reasonableness of such a standard.