독일의 감정평가법제에 관한 연구

박광동 한국토지법학회 2014 土地法學 Vol.30 No.1

In Germany, especially in relation to the appraisal value, transaction value (wert) can ben distinguished from price (Preis). Wert uses collective concept (Aggregierte Preisvorstellungis), is distinguished from preis which is the outcome of specific exchange action from market participants. So, value(wert) can be understood as objective price. So it is customary that there is gap between value and price under the influence of subjective factors. For investigation of the main laws and guidelines, there are building act, property value investigation command, value research directive ,and other special legal norms for the purpose of evaluation method and collateral value directive. With respect to appraisal of Germany ,and also in relation to content of the law, there exist various provisions in close relation to people's property and appraisal system. There is relatively high room for adjustment on real estate appraisal based on standardized basic conditions and requirements. Germany is similar in structure to korea in that, standard land price and appraisal value committee are established with a purpose of preparing procedure for related laws and regulations. However in Germany, there are no government restrictions on appraisers stipulated by the government, thereby official qualification requirement for appraisers. Chamber of commerce sets some requirement for appraiser , and there exist requirement for appraiser actively involved in the Appraisal Committee. On the contrary, "Presidential Decree Under the Price announcement of Real Estate and Appraisal Act" in Article 23 states about the qualifications of appraisers in Korea. Germany’s price of the reference land is similar to korea’s appraised value of land. It is important to calculate realistic appraised value by reducing gap between appraised value of land, and price of the reference land. Additionally, Germany needs to review appropriateness in the application, citizen friendliness, congruence of law at the time of subdivision of law and enactment of new law, which is consistent with the principles of the Germany. 독일에 있어서 감정평가와 관련하여 특히 거래가치는 독일에서 가치(wert)는 가격(Preis)과 구별된다. wert는 구체적인 시장참여자들 간의 구체적인 교환행위의 결과인 Preis와 구별하여 어떤 시장참여자들 그룹의 집합적 가격관념(Aggregierte Preisvorstellung)으로 사용한다. 따라서 가치는 객관화된 가격으로 이해할 수 있다. 따라서 주관적인 영향 하에 있는 가격과 가치간에는 차이가 있는 것이 통례이다. 조사를 위한 주요 법률 및 지침으로는 건축법, 부동산가치조사명령, 가치조사지침이 있고, 그 밖에 특별 평가목적을 위한 법적 규범으로 평가법 및 담보가치조사명령 등이 있다. 독일의 감정평가와 관련한 법률의 내용 구성에 있어서도 감정평가제도에서 국민의 재산권과의 밀접성을 고려한 다양한 규정들이 존재한다. 그리고 독일에서는 법적으로 표준화된 기본조건 및 요구사항에 근거하여 부동산감정평가에 비교적 높은 조정이 존재한다. 그리고 독일의 경우에 기준지가제도 및 감정평가위원회를 두고 법령에 관련 절차를 마련하고 있다는 점은 우리와 비슷한 구조이다. 그런데 독일에서는 감정평가사에 대한 정부규제가 없기 때문에 정부에서 규정하는 공식적인 자격요건이 없으나, 감정평가사를 인증하고 있는 상공회의소의 경우 일정한 요건을 두고 있고, 감정평가위원회에서 활동하는 감정평가사의 경우 일정한 자격요건을 두고 있다. 이에 반하여 우리나라에서는 「부동산 가격공시 및 감정평가에 관한 법률」 제23조에서 감정평가사의 자격에 대해서 규정하고 있다. 다만, 우리나라의 공시지가와 비슷한 독일의 표준지가와 같이 기본적으로는 특수 요인이 제외된 현실의 거래 가격을 기반으로 한 감정가를 산출하여 공시지가와 실거래가의 격차를 줄이도록 할 필요가 있다. 그리고 우리나라에서 감정평가와 관련한 분법 또는 신법 제정시에는 수범자 친숙성, 적용적합성, 법합치성 등의 독일의 원칙을 적용하여 검토하는 것이 필요할 것이다.

부동산등기법의 개정방향에 관한 연구 -디지털(Digital)등기신청을 중심으로

박광동 한국법제연구원 2006 법제연구 Vol.- No.30

일본의 디지털(Digital)동산양도등기제도에 관한 고찰

박광동 한국법제연구원 2008 법제연구 Vol.- No.34

To activate fund-raising through movable property, Korea and Japan needed to establish a system for registration of movable property transfer. For the purpose, Japan has already established a special law for transfer of movable property and discussion about the establishment of such a law is currently underway in Korea. In the event that registration of movable property transfer comes into effect in Korea, digital registration of movable property transfer would take effect just as in Japan. As stated above, discussion about solutions of problems concerned with enforcement of digital registration of movable property transfer is currently underway in Japan. This suggests that Korea should also examine legal and legislative problems before introduction of digital registration of movable property transfer. In connection with it, some legal systems should be prepared. To be specific, a user of registration system should be introduced to secure the authenticity of the registering subject in the use of digital registration of movable property transfer, first of all. In the second place, the principle of application by the party concerned based on the principle of joint application details should be introduced to secure the authenticity of registration as well as digital seal and digital certification required for security of authenticity of documents in the use of digital documents to be followed as an inevitable consequence of the introduction of digital registration of movable property transfer. In the third place, in a way to protect registration information, details of registration should be classified. In the fourth place, the register should be compiled on the basis of transferer for precise public notice of the right, and fast and easy retrieval. Lastly, with reference to the change of a real right, unlike the existing system that the real right is changed with the declaration of intention and transfer of a real right, the real right for digital registration of movable property should be regarded as being changed only when the declaration of intention of a real right is matched with the application for registration. In the legislative aspect, the movable property transfer registration bill should have a provision of legal ground for digital registration of movable property, and enforcement rules should have detail provisions about it. To be specific, such rules should have provisions about keeping period of records, particulars to specify movable property, delivery method of application magnetic disc, items to be written on the application magnetic disc and application method for registration by electronic information processing system. To activate fund-raising through movable property, Korea and Japan needed to establish a system for registration of movable property transfer. For the purpose, Japan has already established a special law for transfer of movable property and discussion about the establishment of such a law is currently underway in Korea. In the event that registration of movable property transfer comes into effect in Korea, digital registration of movable property transfer would take effect just as in Japan. As stated above, discussion about solutions of problems concerned with enforcement of digital registration of movable property transfer is currently underway in Japan. This suggests that Korea should also examine legal and legislative problems before introduction of digital registration of movable property transfer. In connection with it, some legal systems should be prepared. To be specific, a user of registration system should be introduced to secure the authenticity of the registering subject in the use of digital registration of movable property transfer, first of all. In the second place, the principle of application by the party concerned based on the principle of joint application details should be introduced to secure the authenticity of registration as well as digital seal and digital certification required for security of authenticity of documents in the use of digital documents to be followed as an inevitable consequence of the introduction of digital registration of movable property transfer. In the third place, in a way to protect registration information, details of registration should be classified. In the fourth place, the register should be compiled on the basis of transferer for precise public notice of the right, and fast and easy retrieval. Lastly, with reference to the change of a real right, unlike the existing system that the real right is changed with the declaration of intention and transfer of a real right, the real right for digital registration of movable property should be regarded as being changed only when the declaration of intention of a real right is matched with the application for registration. In the legislative aspect, the movable property transfer registration bill should have a provision of legal ground for digital registration of movable property, and enforcement rules should have detail provisions about it. To be specific, such rules should have provisions about keeping period of records, particulars to specify movable property, delivery method of application magnetic disc, items to be written on the application magnetic disc and application method for registration by electronic information processing system.

대심도법(안)과 집합건물법의 관계에 관한 소고*

박광동 한국집합건물법학회 2021 집합건물법학 Vol.40 No.-

Recently, in Korea, the lack of infrastructure due to overcrowding in large cities has become a problem. In order to solve these problems, the Deep Underground Space project for transportation facilities is being promoted in earnest. In relation to the deep underground Space development, the government is pushing for legislation. And the National Assembly currently has a legislative bill for Deep Underground Space development pending. The following is a review of the relationship between Deep Underground Space development and ownership. First, if a special law is enacted in relation to Deep Underground Space, Article 211 of the Civil Act can be the basis for asserting the possibility of limiting the use and profit of the owner's ownership. Second, in the Act on Ownership And Management Of Condominium Buildings, there is no separate regulation on legitimate interests regarding the scope of ownership, but rather on common interests. These common interests are related to the obligations to the division owner and management group. In other words, in principle, Article 212 of the Civil Act is based on the scope of ownership, except where there is a separate provision in the Act on Ownership And Management Of Condominium Buildings. A review of the relationship between the Act on Deep Underground Space(Draft) and the Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings is as follows. First, the Act on Deep Underground Space(Draft) is a special law and has the characteristics of an exception law, a disposition law, and a management law. The Act on Ownership And Management Of Condominium Buildings has the characteristics of the people's property law, the group law, the consumer law, and the management law. In other words, in the name of the law, it is stipulated in the Act on Deep Underground Space(Draft) as a special law and the Act on Ownership And Management Of Condominium Buildings as the management law. Second, the Act on Deep Underground Space(Draft) does not recognize compensation for loss. In this regard, it is necessary to analyze whether the depth of the depth falls within the scope of the legitimate interests of the landowner with the possibility of the owner's control. In addition, utmost care should be taken to ensure that the ownership of landowners is not infringed. Considering these points, it is reasonable to recognize the loss compensation. The same applies to owners under the Act on Ownership And Management Of Condominium Buildings. Third, the Act on Deep Underground Space(Draft) does not recognize the right to subdivision. However, in order to acquire a legitimate title for restricting the ownership of land owners in large-scale underground development, it is necessary to establish a separate superficial right. The same applies to owners under the Act on Ownership And Management Of Condominium Buildings 최근 우리나라에서는 대도시의 과밀현상으로 인한 기반시설의 부족이 문제가 되고 있다. 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위하여 교통시설에대한 대심도 사업이 본격적으로 추진되고 있다. 대심도 지하개발과관련하여 정부에서는 입법을 추진하고 있다. 그리고 현재 국회에는 대심도 지하개발에 대한 입법안이 계류 중이다. 대심도 지하개발과소유권의 관계에 대한 설정과 관련하여 검토하여 보면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 대심도와 관련하여 특별법이 제정되는 경우에, 민법 제211조가 소유권자의 소유권의 내용 중 사용, 수익에 대한 제한 가능성을주장할 수 있는 근거 규정이 될 수 있다. 둘째, 집합건물법에서는소유권의 범위에 관한 정당한 이익에 대한 규정이 별도로 존재하지는 않고, 공동의 이익에 대한 규정을 두고 있다. 이와 같은 공동의이익은 구분소유자 및 관리단 등에 대한 의무와 관련한 사항이다. 즉, 집합건물법에 별도의 규정이 있는 경우를 제외하고 소유권의 범위와 관련하여서는 원칙적으로 민법 제212조에 근거한다. 대심도법(안)과 집합건물법의 관계에 대하여 검토하여 보면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 대심도법(안)은 특별법으로서 예외법, 목적법 및 관리법으로서의 성격을 가지고 있다. 집합건물법은 국민의 재산법, 단체법, 소비자법, 관리법의 성격을 가지고 있다. 즉, 법률명에서 특별법으로서의 대심도법(안)과 관리법으로서의 집합건물법으로 규정되어 있다. 둘째, 대심도법(안)에서는 손실보상을 인정하지 않는다. 이에 대해서는 대심도의 깊이가 소유자의 지배가능성이 있는 토지소유자의 정당한 이익의 범주에 속하는 지에 대한 정밀한 분석이 필요하다. 또한, 토지소유자의 소유권이 침해되지 않도록 최대한의 주의를 기울여야 한다. 이러한 점을 고려하여 보면, 손실보상을 인정하는 것이 타당하다. 이러한 사항은 집합건물법상의 소유자에게도동일하다. 셋째, 대심도법(안)에서는 구분지상권을 인정하지 않는다. 그러나 대심도 지하개발에서 토지소유자의 소유권의 제한을 위한정당한 권원을 취득하기 위해서는 구분지상권 설정이 필요하다. 이러한 사항은 집합건물법상의 소유자에게도 동일하다.

법학전문대학원에서의 임상법학교육방법론

박광동 원광대학교 법학연구소 2008 圓光法學 Vol.24 No.1

The Clinical Education of Law will be introduced to harmonize the theory of the law with the practical business of the law in the law school from January 1. 2009. It is a hot issue which of the two is more emphasized. If they must be differentiated in the course of law-school, the theory of the law should be emphasized. It is only the issue how the relation of the two should be thaught with a new angle on the problem. It is necessary to study the depth and range of the two subject matters through the methodology on the Education of the law. At the same time it is promoted, the whole process of lawsuits needs to be divided to the course before the suit, under the suit and after the suit. In the case the course should be divided to the case in which it is needed to progress the suits with the high level of the knowledge and performance about the suits and the case in which it is possible to assist. It is made it possible for the students of the law school to take part in the progress of the suits eagerly when the suit is not launched yet and the suit is under the progress. In other cases, it is reasonable that the students of the law school should be guided to assist in the most course of suits. There is another problem how it is possible to connect the clinical ecucation fo the law with the practical business and to teach them actively. The clinical education of the law is important for the harmonization of the two subject matters. But it needs to make full use of the local characteristics of the area where the law school is addressed and to prepare the program for the clinical education of the law to use the specific characters of a course of study effectively in the University which runs the law school. In that case, however, Universities should not run not only run the one professional clinical education program of the law but also many ones. that is, the students has to be able to study the professional clinical education program of law and get the support to cultivate the capability as a professional lawyer.

철봉에서 몸펴 2회전 뒤돌아 내리기 동작의 운동학적 분석

박광동 단국대학교 1993 論文集 Vol.27 No.-

토지거래규제와 등기 -토지거래 간접규제로서의 인감증명제도 개편논의-

박광동 한국토지법학회 2011 土地法學 Vol.27 No.1

인감증명제도는 1914년 인감증명규칙을 통해 시행된 이래 약 100년 동안 토지거래간접규제로서의 역할 뿐만 아니라, 국가가 사인에 대하여 후견적 지위에서 인감 자체의 동일성 증명 및 거래당사자의 주체의 진정성 확보와 거래의사의 확인을 위한 자료로서 중요한 역할을 수행하여 왔다. 현재까지 사적거래계에 대한 과도한 행정규제라는 문제뿐만 아니라 국민들의 재산상 피해발생의 원인 제공 등에 의한 이유로 지속적으로 인감증명제도에 대한 제도개선이 이루어졌다. 그러나 제도의 개선만으로는 한계에 이르게 되어 국민들도 인감증명제도 대체안의 필요성을 점차 인식하게 되었다. 이에 정부에서는 인감증명제도를 대체할 제도로서 본인서명사실확인 등에 관한 제도를 구상하게 되었고, 이에 대한 법률적인 기반을 조성하기 위해 본인서명사실확인 등에 관한 법률(안)을 입법예고하였다. 본인서명사실확인제도는 공증 등 사적거래의 신뢰성 확보방안이 정착되기 전까지 운영되는 한시적 제도로서, ①민원인이 확인청 방문 → ②신분확인 후 전자패드에 서명 → ③본인서명사실확인서 발급(확인청) → ④인감증명서 대신 활용의 절차로 진행된다. 동 제도는 대리인에 의한 신청·발급이 금지되고 본인이 직접 확인청에 가야 하므로 대리인에 의한 인감증명서 발급이 가능한 인감증명제도에 비해 국민적 불편이 발생할 수 있다. 이러한 문제에 대처하기 위해, ①재외국민, 국내거소신고자(재외국민, 외국국적동포), 외국인 등, ②수감자, ③군복무자, ④거동불능자 등에 대해서는 어느 정도의 대책이 수립되었으나, 일반인이 직접 확인청 방문이 어려운 경우에 대한 문제는 여전히 남게 되어, 정부에서는 전자정부정책의 정책적 결정 및 국민편의 증진의 목적으로 전자본인서명확인제도를 도입하게 되었다. 전자본인서명확인제도는 ①사용자의 사전이용 신청(최초 1회, 확인청 방문) → ② 민원인이 정부사이트(민원24) 접속 → ③공인인증서로 본인 확인 → ④확인서 작성 → ⑤전자서명 → ⑥수요기관이 온라인상으로 확인 후 민원 처리라는 절차로 진행된다. 그러나 문제는 사용자의 사전이용 신청을 확인청에서 하도록 되어 있어 또 다른 행정규제로 볼 수 있고, 특히 등기신청 중에 전자등기소를 이용하는 경우에는 동일한 절차를 전자등기소에서 다시 해야한다는 측면에서 절차의 중복성 문제를 제기할 수 있다. 다만, 현재 동 제도를 시행하게 된다면 잠정적으로는 이용자 사전 등록절차를 운영할 필요가 있으나, 일정한 여건을 갖춘 후에는 이용자 사전등록절차를 폐지하는 방안이 필요하다. 그리고 양자의 공통적인 문제로는 부동산관련 사용용도란의 구성문제로서, 가능하다면 단순하게 부동산 매도와 기타로 구분하는 방안이 합리적이라고 생각하며, 등기와의 관계에 있어서도 현행 인감증명제도가 사용되는 부분에 본인서명사실확인 등에 관한 제도가 사용될 것이지만, 특히 전자본인서명확인서는 민원24포털에서 수요청이 직접 확인하도록 되어 있기 때문에 부동산디지털등기신청의 경우에는 전자본인서명확인서를 전자등기소상에서 정보공유를 통한 자동첨부가 가능하도록 하는 방안도 고려할 필요가 있다. Since the seal certification system was enforced in 1914 through the seal impression certificate Rule, it has played an important role during 100 years thereafter as data for certifying the identity of a certificate itself in a nation's tutelary position on a private seal and securing the authenticity of a transaction party as a main body and confirming any transaction decision as well as a role of an indirect regulation on any land transaction. Until now, the seal impression certificate system has been continuously improved because of some problems due to the provision of causes to generate damage to the people's property as well as the severe administrative regulation on private transaction system. However, since only its improvement reaches a limit, the people has been gradually aware of any necessity for the replacement of such seal impression certificate system. Thus, Korean government has considered introducing a signature verification system, etc. as a plan to replace the seal impression certificate system and put the legislative notice of the Act on the Signature Verification System, Etc. in order to prepare the legal basis about such replacement. The signature verification system is a temporary system which will be operated until any plan to secure the reliability of private transaction such as a notarial act, etc. gets firmly fixed. Since any application?issuance by proxy shall be prohibited and the person himself goes to a competent authority under the system, some public inconvenience may be happened rather than a seal impression certificate system in which a seal impression certificate by proxy can be issued. In order to deal with such problems, some measures for ① overseas Korean, domestic residence reporter (overseas Korean, foreign country citizenship Korean), foreigner. etc, ② prisoners, ③ military person, ④ non-behavior, etc. are established. However, since there remains continuously a problem in which it is difficult for a common people to visit directly any competent authority, Korean government comes to introduce a signature verification system for the purpose of making the policy decision of an electronic government plan and increasing public conveniences. However, since it has a problem in which a user's application for prior use shall be made in a competent authority, it may be deemed as another administrative regulation. Specially, in case of using an electronic registry during a registration application, the same procedure shall be again performed in the electronic registry. Thus, any procedural redundancy problem can be raised. In case of enforcing currently such system, it is necessary to operate tentatively a user prior registration procedure. However, in the event that some conditions are met, it is required to cancel the user prior registration procedure. Additionally, the common problem of both systems is the organizational problem of a part for an intended use relating to a real property. It is thought to be reasonable to divide simply real property sale and other parts as much as possible. Regarding the relation with the registration, the signature verification system, etc. can be used in a part in which current seal impression certificate system is used. Specially, since the electronic seal impression certificate shall be directly checked by a competent authority in a civil appeal 24 portal, it is necessary to consider a plan to attach automatically an electronic seal impression certificate through information sharing in an electronic registry in case of a real property digital registration application.

지역균형발전을 위한 주택공급 법제 개선방안: 숙의공론화 제도를 중심으로

박광동 한국부동산법학회 2022 不動産法學 Vol.26 No.3

The issue of regional balance and housing supply in the current Government is a very important issue. Currently, the government is announcing and implementing various policies on balanced regional development and expansion of housing supply. In this situation, it is necessary to discuss the legislation of the “Place of Public Deliberation” as a way to improve the housing supply law that can achieve balanced regional development. In order to achieve its purpose through Public Deliberation, principles of Participation, Responsibility, Ethic, Sincerity, Independence, Deliberation, Non- Linearity, and Transparency must be implemented. As for what kind of legal system to establish in relation to the legislation of the Public Deliberation system for housing supply, it can be envisioned to enact individual laws and to revise some of the current laws. However, when considering this legislative system, in introducing a Public Deliberation legal system for housing supply, it should first be decided by considering which is advantageous in realizing legislative purposes, which is suitable for maintaining the consistency of the legal system, and which helps the people understand the law. From this point of view, it is reasonable in terms of legislative policy to establish a regulation for Public Deliberation in the Housing Act. When introducing a Public Deliberation system related to the housing supply legislation for balanced regional development, it is necessary to review how to regulate the law. About two legislative measures can be proposed for this. First of all, there is a plan to present only the legal basis related to the Public Deliberation in the law, and to place detailed matters in sub-laws. In addition, it is possible to devise a plan to specify detailed matters related to the Public Deliberation by dividing the chapters into individual laws. However, the former is valid in the standard of legislative enactment or amendment. 현 정부에서 지역균형과 주택공급의 문제는 매우 중요한 사항이다. 현 정부에서는 지역균형발전과 주택공급확대에 대한 다양한 정책을 발표 및 시행하고 있다. 이러한 상황에서 지역균형발전이 이루어질 수있는 주택공급 법제 개선방안으로서의 “숙의공론화의 장” 에 대한 입법화에 대한 논의가 필요하다. 숙의공론화를 통해 그 목적을 달성하기 위해서는 민주성, 책임성, 도덕성, 진정성, 독립성, 숙의성, 회귀성, 투명성 등의 원칙이 시행되어야 한다. 지역균형발전을 주택공급을 위한 숙의공론화 제도의 법제화와 관련하여 어떠한 법제도를 구축할 것인가에 대해서는 이를 개별 법률을 제정해서 하는 방안과 현행 법률 중 일부개정을 통해서 하는 방안을 구상할 수 있다. 다만, 이러한 입법체계를 고려하는 경우에는 지역균형발전을 주택공급을 위한 숙의공론화의법제도 도입에 있어서 우선 입법 정책적으로 입법 목적을 실현하는 데 어느 쪽이 유리한지, 어느 쪽이 입법 경제적인지, 어느 쪽이 법체계의 정합성 유지에 적합한지, 어느 쪽이 국민이 법을 이해하는 데 도움이되는지 등을 고려해서 결정해야 한다. 이러한 관점에서 보았을 때 「주택법」에 숙의공론화 규정을 두는 방안이 입법 정책적으로 타당하다. 지역균형 발전을 위한 주택공급 법제 관련 숙의공론화 제도 도입시에 법규정을 어떻게 할 것인가에 대한 검토가 필요하다. 이에 대해서는 2가지 정도의 입법 방안의 제시가 가능하다. 우선, 숙의공론화와 관련한 법적 근거만을 법률에 제시하고, 세부적인 사항은 하위법령에 두는 방안이 있다. 그리고 숙의공론화와 관련한 세부적인 사항을 개별 법률에 장을 구분하여 적시하는 방안의 구상도 가능하다. 다만, 입법 제정 또는 개정의 기준에서는 전자가 타당하다.

제4차 산업혁명 관련 법제교류형 ODA방식에 관한 소고

박광동 한국입법정책학회 2020 입법정책 Vol.14 No.2

제4차 산업혁명과 관련하여 해외 교류 형태로 국제협력과 ODA가 있다. 제 4차 산업혁명과 관련한 법제교류형 ODA는 개발도상국 또는 체제전환국에 대한 융합 지능정보기술에 의한 산업의 대변혁이 발생하는 법제협력 및 법제 지원 방식이다. 제4차 산업혁명 관련 법제교류형 ODA 지표 설정을 위해서는 UN의 법치 주의 지표(Rule of Law Indicator)와 OECD DAC의 5대 평가기준을 검토하 여야 한다. OECD DAC의 5대 평가기준으로는 적절성(Relevance), 효율성 (Efficiency), 효과성(Effectiveness), 영향력(Impact), 지속가능성 (Sustainability)이 있다. 그리고 제4차 산업혁명과 관련한 법제교류형 ODA의 수행을 위해서는 협 력대상국에 대한 현황 및 협력, 지원 방식을 정하기 위한 두 단계의 검증이 필요하다. 첫 번째 단계로 협력대상국에 대한 정확한 법치주의 현황분석과 수요발굴을 위한 지표 설정이고, 두 번째 단계는 개별 법제행정 역량강화사 업을 위한 지표에 적용하는 것이다. 결국, 제4차 산업혁명 관련 법제교류형 ODA에서는 협력대상국의 수요 요 청에 대한 패키지형 협력 및 지원 체계를 구축하여 수행하여야 한다 There are international cooperation and ODA as international exchanges in relation to the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The legal exchange type ODA related to the 4th Industrial Revolution is a legal cooperation and legal support method that generates the revolution of the industry by convergence intelligence information technology. In order to establish the legal exchange ODA index related to the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the Rule of Law Indicator of the United Nations and the five evaluation criteria of the OECD DAC should be reviewed. The five criteria for evaluation of OECD DAC include Relevance, Efficiency, Effectiveness, Impact, and Sustainability. order to carry out the legal exchange type ODA related to the Fourth Industrial Revolution, two steps of verification are needed to determine the current status, cooperation and support method for the partner countries. e first step is to analyze the current state of the rule of law and to set up an indicator for finding demand for the countries to be cooperated, and the second step is to apply it to the index for the individual legislative administrative capacity building project. nally, the 4th Industrial Revolution-related Legislative Exchange ODA should establish and implement a package-type cooperation and support system for demand requests from partner countries

제4차 산업혁명시대의 공간정제 법제 동향

박광동 한국지적정보학회 2017 한국지적정보학회 학술발표대회 논문집 Vol.2017 No.11