전이성 뇌암 환자의 호스피스 완화의료

문도호,최화숙,Moon, Do-Ho,Choe, Wha-Sook 한국호스피스완화의료학회 2005 한국호스피스.완화의료학회지 Vol.8 No.1

목적: 치료에 관계없이 뇌전이는 예후가 불량하다. 본 연구는 뇌 전이로 호스피스 완화의료를 받았던 환자를 대상으로 적절한 돌봄을 받았는지를 알아보고 임상적인 특성을 알아보고자 하였다. 방법: 2003년 3월부터 2005년 3월까지 본원의 호스피스 병동에서 뇌전이로 호스피스 완화의료를 받았던 40명의 말기 암환자를 대상으로 후향적으로 의무기록을 조사하였다. 결과: 대상자 중 남자 20명(50%), 여자 20명(50%)이며 연령의 중간값은 64세 였다. 가장 많은 암은 폐암으로 22명(55%)이고 다음으로 위암 5명(13%), 유방암 3명(8%) 순서였다. 원발암에 대한 전치료는 전혀 치료를 하지 않은 환자가 16명(40%)이고 항암치료는 20명(50%)를 받았다. 뇌전이 때의 증상은 두통 12명(30%), 의식변화 10명(25%), 국소 약화 9명(23%), 경련 4명(10%) 순서였다. 호스피스 병동의 입원 이유는 의식변화가 13명(33%)으로 가장 많았고 통증이 9명(23%)였다. 호스피스 완화의료를 받게 된 이유로 환자와 가족이 원한 경우가 14명(35%), 의사가 의뢰한 경우가 1명, 그 나머지 25명(62%)은 본원에서 보존적인 요법을 받던 중 호스피스 완화의료를 받게 된 경우이다. 호스피스 병동에서 입원기간의 중간값은 19일이었으며 호스피스 완화의료로 전원 후 생존기간의 중간값은 41일이었다. 뇌전이 진단 후 중간 생존기간은 87일이었다. 결론: 전이성 뇌암 환자의 호스피스 완화의료의 기간은 환자를 돌보기에는 충분하지 못하였다. 효과적인 호스피스 완화의료를 위해서는 의사와 환자, 가족에 대한 지속적인 호스피스 완화의료 교육과 홍보가 필요하리라고 생각된다. Purpose: Regardless of treatment, brain metastases are associated with a poor prognosis. We aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of cancer patients with brain mestastases they after admission into a hospice unit and knowing they have received appropriate hospice and palliative care. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records in 40 cancer patients with brain metastases they after admission into a hospice unit from March in 2003 to March in 2005. Results: There were 20 males (50%) and 20 females (50%), and the median age of the patients was 64 years. The most common cause of brain metastases was lung cancer (22 patients, 55%), followed by stomach cancer (5, 13%) and breast cancer (3, 8%). Sixteen patients (40%) have never been teated and 20 patient have received the chemotherapy for the primary cancer. The most common symptom of cancer patients with brain metastases is headache (12 patients, 30%), followed by mental change (10, 25%), focal weakness (9, 23%) and convulsion (4, 10%). The most prevalent cause for admission was mental change (13 patients, 33%), followed by pain (9 patients, 23%). The reasons for hospice and palliative care were through recommendation of physician (1 patient, 3%), patient and family self (14, 35%) and the others (25, 62%). Twenty five of the others has been referred to hospice and palliative care during conservative management after referral and enrolled at hospice unit. The median hospitalization was 19 days and median survival in hospice and palliative care was 41 days. The median survival was 87 days from the day when the cancer patients have been diagnosed as brain metastases to death. Conclusion: The duration of hospice and palliative care was not enough to care the cancer patients with brain metastases. We suggest physicians, patients and family need the education and promotion for effective hospice and palliative care.

완화적 시술을 받은 악성 위장관 폐색 말기 암환자의 임상적 예후인자

문도호,최화숙,Moon, Do-Ho,Choe, Wha-Sook 한국호스피스완화의료학회 2005 한국호스피스.완화의료학회지 Vol.8 No.2

목적: 악성 위장관 폐색 환자에서 완화적 시술이나 수술은 폐색의 다양한 증상을 조절할 뿐만 아니라 삶의 질을 향상시킨다. 본 연구는 완화적인 시술을 받았던 악성 위장관 폐색 말기암 환자의 임상적 특징과 예후인자를 알아보고자 하였다. 방법: 2002년 5월부터 2005년 5월까지 본원에서 악성 위장관 폐색으로 진단받아 완화적인 시술을 받았던 48명의 말기암 환자를 대상으로 후향적으로 조사하였다. 완화적인 암절제 환자는 제외하였다. 임상적 특성과 시술내용을 조사하였고 예후인자는 log-rank test를 이용한 단변량 분석을 하고 통계적으로 의미 있는 인자는 Cox's proportional hazard model을 사용하여 다변량 분석을 하였다. 결과: 연령의 중앙값은 65세이고 남자가 25명(52%), 여자가 23명(48%)이었다. 가장 많은 암은 대장직장암으로 26명(55%)이고 다음으로 10명(21%)의 위암이었다. 치료를 전혀 받지 않았던 환자는 25명(58%)이었고 20명(42%)은 치료를 받았으며 이 중 18명은 항암 치료를 받은 과거력이 있었다. 가장 흔한 증상은 통증으로 15명(31%)이었다. 활동도 1점 혹은 2점이 23명(48%), 3점 혹은 4점이 25명(52%)이었다. 가장 많은 완화적인 시술은 대장루술로 19명이 받았다. 완화적 시술로 인한 사망은 없었다. 단변량과 다변량 분석에 의해서 전체 생존기간과 무증상 생존기간에 대하여 활동도 만이 의미있는 독립 예후인자였다. 전체 중간 생존기간은 150일이었으며 무증상 중간 생존기간은 90일이었다. 결론: 완화적 시술을 받은 악성 위장관 폐색 환자의 전체 중간 생존기간과 무증상 중간 생존기간에 대하여 활동도만이 유일한 독립 예후인자였다. Purpose: Palliative procedures or surgical interventions not only manage various symptoms of malignant gastrointestinal obstruction, but also improve the quality of life. We investigated the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of terminal cancer patients with palliative procedures for malignant gastrointestinal obstruction. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 48 terminal cancer patients with palliative procedures for malignant gastrointestinal obstruction at Sam Anyang hospital from May in 2002 to May in 2005. We excluded patients with palliative tumor resection. We analyzed prognostic factors in symtom-free survival and overall survival using Kaplan-Meier method, univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: There were 25 males (52%) and 23 females (48%), and median age of 48 patients was 65 years. The most common cause of malignant gastrointestinal obstruction was colorectal (26 patients, 55%), followed by stomach (10, 21%). Twenty patients (42%) received previous treatment (chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy) and 28 (58%) never received any. Eighteen of 20 had received chemotherapy. The most common symptom was pain (15 patients, 31%). Twenty three patients (48%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) performance status of 1 or 2 score and 25 patients (52%) 3 or 4 score. The most common palliative procedure was colostomy and there was no mortality concerning the palliative procedures. By univariate and multivariate analysis, performance status was the only independent prognostic factor in overall survival and symptom-free survival. Overall survival was 150 days and symptom-free survival was 90 days. Conclusion:. We confirmed that perftatdormance status is significant independent prognostic factor in terminal cancer patients with palliative procedures for malignant gastrointestinal obstruction.

암환자가 지각하는 가족지지가 암환자의 삶의 질에 미치는 영향

문도호,이문숙,김현진,정혜민,박우정,신혜진,전화연,최화숙,Mun, Do-Ho,Lee, Mun-Suk,Kim, Hyeon-Jin,Jeong, Hye-Min,Park, U-Jeong,Sin, Hye-Jin,Jeon, Hwa-Yeon,Choe, Hwa-Suk 한국호스피스협회 2005 호스피스 학술지 Vol.5 No.1

Purpose:The purpose of this study was to find the ways to improve a quality of life of cancer patients through the family support by analyzing the correlation between quality of life and family support that cancer patients perceived. Methods: The questionnaires for this study were collected from 43 cancer patients who were admitted in general hospitals at Gyounggido from July 2004 to August 2004. The questionnaire was composed of total 60 items, which were general characteristics of 18 items, family support of 11 items and quality of life of 31 items. Kang's(1984) scale of family support and Tae's(2000) scale of quality of life were used. The data were analyzed with SPSS WIN 10.0 program using frequency, mean±SD, t-test, ANOVA and Pearson's correlation analysis. Results: Forty three cancer patients answered the questionnaire. Twenty three patients was a male and 20 a female. Mean scale of family support according to general characteristics was 3.87±0.71. Mean scale of quality of life according to general characteristics was 5.89±1.08 and relatively high. The better degree of education, the higher quality of life significantly and the less physical discomfort, the higher quality of life significantly. The quality of life when the patient burdens the spouse with treatment cost was significantly higher. A correlation between degree of family support and quality of life was r=0.488 and the higher family support that cancer patients perceived, the higher quality of life significantly(p<0.001). Conclusion: The higher family support that cancer patients perceived, the higer quality of life significantly. We suggest concrete and systemic program for family support.

구연 : 혈액종양 ; 진행성 비소세포폐암에서 Vinorelbine, Ifosfamide, Cisplatin의 복합항암요법

문도호,심병용,이명아,송치원,변재호,우인숙,강진형,홍영선,이경식 대한내과학회 2002 대한내과학회 추계학술대회 Vol.63 No.-

말기암 환자의 악성 장 폐색

문도호,최화숙,Moon, Do-Ho,Choe, Wha-Sook 한국호스피스완화의료학회 2004 한국호스피스.완화의료학회지 Vol.7 No.2

목적: 말기암 환자의 장 폐색은 예후가 비교적 나쁘다. 의사들도 삶의 질 측면에서 완화적인 시술이나 수술을 고려하고 있으나 결정하기가 어려운 경우가 있다. 본 연구는 말기암 환자의 장 폐색 진단 후 임상적 특징, 완화적 시술이나 수술을 받았던 환자에서 생존 기간과 예후 인자를 조사하여 보고자 하였다. 방법: 2002년 5월부터 2004년 5월까지 본원을 방문한 말기암 환자로 장 폐색 진단을 받았던 40명 환자의 의무기록을 후향적으로 조사하였다. 결과: 남자가 21명(53%), 여자가 19명(47%)였고 나이의 중간값은 $64.1{\pm}1.58$세였다. 장 폐색의 가장 많은 원인은 대장직장암이 18명(45%)이였으며 위암 11명(28%), 췌장암 4명(10%), 기타 7명(19%) 순이였다. 장 폐색 진단 시 가장 많은 전이는 복막전이가 14명(35%) 가장 많았고 다음이 간 전이가 13명(33%)였다. 폐색 시 증상은 구토가 15명(38%)로 가장 많았고 복부통증 10명(25%), 변비 6명(15%), 복부 팽만 5명(13%) 이였다. 일상수행능력(ECOG)은 3점이 20명(50%0, 2점 16명(40%), 4점(10%)였다. 완화적 시술이나 수술을 받았던 군이 30명이였고 받지 않았던 군이 10명이였다. 완화적 시술이나 수술을 받았던 군에서 치료를 받았던 시점에서 중간생존기간은 142일로 받지 않았던 군의 장 폐색 진단시부터 중간생존기간 30일에 비하여 유의하게 중간 생존기간이 길었다. 예후 인자로는 생활수행능력상태 2점과 하부 장 폐색과 대장암에 의해서 폐색이 있는 경우에 유의하게 생존기간이 길었다. 결론: 말기암 환자의 장 폐색은 적응증이 될 경우에 적극적인 완화적 시술이나 수술을 고려하는 것이 좋을 것으로 생각된다. Purpose: As for the malignant bowel obstruction of terminal cancer patient, a prognosis is relatively bad. Physicians consider palliative procedures or surgery for the quality of life, but sometimes it is hard to decide. After diagnosis of a malignant bowel obstruction in terminal cancer patients, we investigated the clinical characteristics, the prognostic factors and the survival of patients with palliative procedures or surgery. Methods: we retrospectively reviewed the medical records in 40 malignant bowel obstruction patients who had been diagnosed as terminal cancer from May in 2002 to May in 2004. Results: There were 21 males (53%) and 19 females (47%), and median age of patients was $64.1{\pm}1.58$ years. The most common cause of malignant bowel obstruction was colorectal cancer (18 patients, 45%), followed by stomach cancer (11, 28%), pancreatic cancer (4, 10%), others (7, 19%). Metastases were carcinomatosis peritonei (14 patients, 35%), liver (13, 33%). During a bowel obstruction, symptoms were vomiting (15 patients, 38%), abdominal pain (10, 25%), constipation (6, 15%), abdominal distension (5, 13%). Performance status (ECOG) was 2 score (16 patients, 40%), 3 score (20, 50%), 4 score (4, 10%). Palliative procedure group were 30 patients, the others 10. Median survival in palliative procedure group was 142 days, that of no palliation group 30. Median survival time of palliative procedure group from palliative procedures or surgery were significantly higher than that of no palliation group from diagnosis of malignant bowel obstruction. Prognostic factors of palliative procedure group were PS, site of obstruction and primary cancer. Median survival in PS 2, lower GI obstruction and colorectal cancer was higher than PS 3, upper GI obstruction and others, respectively. Conclusion: we recommend aggressively palliative procedures or surgery in malignant bowel obstruction patients diagnosed with terminal cancer if palliative procedures or surgery could be performed effectively.

통증의 평가와 조절의 원칙

문도호,Mun, Do-Ho 한국호스피스협회 2006 호스피스 학술지 Vol.6 No.2

호스피스 자원봉사자 지망생들의 암에 대한 인식도

문도호,최화숙,Mun, Do-Ho,Choe, Hwa-Suk 한국호스피스협회 2005 호스피스 학술지 Vol.5 No.2

Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the perception of cancer in aspirants for hospice volunteer. Methods: Aspirants for hospice volunteer were surveyed by questionnaire before education of hospice program in September 2005 at Pyongan Hospice Center of Sam Anyang Hospital. The questionnaire was composed of total 28 items. Ten items were general characteristics and the remaining 18 items knowledge, attitude and practice of cancer and cancer pain. The data were analyzed by SPSS WIN 11.0 program using frequency, mean, percentage. Results: Eighty nine questionnaires were returned. There were 6 males and 83 females, and median age of aspirants was 46 years. Forty five aspirants(51%) had a cancer patient in th family or relatives and the others 44(49%) not. Forty eight(54%) had favorable attitude about modern clinical medicine for cancer treatment and the others 39(44%) unfavorable. Fifty eight(65%) had favorable attitude about complementary and alternative medicine for cancer treatment and the others 20(23%). In response to the question about 'How illness is a cancer', 25 aspirants(25%) responded to chronic disease, 42(47%) suffering incurable disease, the others 17(19%) death sentence, respectively. A number of aspirants had wrong knowledge and understanding of cancer, cancer pain and opioid analgesics. Seventy one percent aspirants feared cancer pain. Conclusion: The credibility to modern clinical medicine for cancer treatment was relatively low in aspirants for hospice volunteer compared with complementary and alternative medicine. They recognized a cancer as suffering incurable disease and death sentence than chronic disease. A number of aspirants had wrong knowledge of cancer, cancer pain and opioid analgesics. Therefore, further studies and trial will be warranted to evaluated the causes of these results and improve the credibility of modern clinical medicine for cancer treatment in general population.

말기 암 환자의 호스피스 완화의료에 대한 의사들의 태도

문도호,이명아,고수진,최윤선,김수현,염창환,Moon, Do-Ho,Lee, Myung-Ah,Koh, Su-Jin,Choi, Youn-Seon,Kim, Su-Hyun,Yeom, Chang-Hwan 한국호스피스완화의료학회 2006 한국호스피스.완화의료학회지 Vol.9 No.2

목적: 본 연구는 말기 암 환자의 호스피스 완화의료에 대한 의사들의 태도에 대하여 알아보고자 하였다. 방법: 서울과 경지지역의 종합병원에 근무하는 전문의를 대상으로 호스피스 완화의학 연구회에서 자체 개발한 설문지를 이용하여 말기 암 환자에서 호스피스 완화의료에 대한 태도를 조사하였다. 설문지는 총 17문항으로 구성되었다. 수집된 자료는 실수, 중앙값과 백분율로 분석되었다. 결과: 총 81명(남자 46명, 여자 35명)이 설문지에 응답하였으며 나이의 중앙값은 35세였다. 내과가 36명(44.4%)으로 가장 많았다. 전문의 경력의 중앙값은 4년이었다. 1주일에 진료를 하는 환자 수는 거의 환자를 보지 않는 경우가 43명(53.2%)으로 가장 많았다. 호스피스 완화의료의 정확한 정의를 알고 있는 의사수는 37명(45.6%)이었다. 호스피스 완화의료의 필요성에 대하여 80명(98.8%)이 필요하다고 응답하였고 이 중에 73명(91.2%)이 완화의학 전문의가 필요하다고 응답하였다. 말기 암 환자에 대하여 적극적으로 호스피스 완화의료에 의뢰하겠는가에 대한 질문에 55명(67.9%)이 그렇게 하겠다고 응답하였으며 이 중 17명(30.9%)은 주저한 경험이 있는데 이유로 가족의 반대가 6명(35.3%)으로 가장 많았으며 다음으로 '환자를 포기하는 것 같아서'로 응답한 의사가 4명(23.5%)이었다. 적극적으로 호스피스 완화의료에 의뢰하지 않은 22명(27.2%)에 대하여 이유로 '환자를 포기하는 느낌'과 기타 사항으로 '절차를 모른다'가 각각 6명(27.2%)으로 가장 많았다. 37명(45.7%)의 의사가 임종 전 3개월에 호스피스 완화의료를 받는 것이 가장 좋다고 응답하였으며 가장 도움을 받는 것은 정신적, 심리적 조절이라고 응답한 의사가 58명(71.6%)으로 가장 많았다. 결론: 대부분의 의사들이 호스피스 완화의료의 필요성은 인식하고 있으나 말기 암 환자에 대한 호스피스 완화의료에 의뢰하는 적극적인 자세는 부족하였다. 의사들에게 지속적인 호스피스 완화의료에 대한 교육과 정보, 홍보가 필요하리라고 생각된다. Purpose: This study was designed to understand the doctor's attitude toward hospice and palliative care for terminal cancer patients. Methods: Specialists who work at general hospital were surveyed with questionnaires about hospice and palliative care for terminal cancer patients. The questionnaires comprise 17 items. The data were statistically analyzed. Results: Eighty one doctors responded. Their median age was 35 years old. Thirty six doctors (44.4%) were from internal medicine. The median of specialist's experience was 4 years. Forty three respondents (53.2%) have rarely examined and treated cancer patients even a week. Thirty seven respondents (45.6%) knew the exact definition of hospice and palliative care. Eighty respondents (98.8%) felt that hospice and palliative care is necessary, and 91.2% of them responded the necessity of palliative medicine specialist. As to the question 'Do you positively referred terminal cancer patient to hospice and palliative care?', 55 respondents (67.9%) responded 'Yes' and 22 (27.2%) 'No'. Among the 'Yes' respondents 17 (30.9%) had an experience of hesitation for referring patients to hospice and palliative care; the most common reason was the disagreement of family members (6, 35.3%). As for the reasons of responding 'No', 6 doctors (27.2%) did so because of their 'feeling of abandoning the patients' and the other f for the 'lack of information on the referral procedure for hospice and palliative care'. Thirty seven specialists (45.7%) thought it is most desirable for the patients to have hospice and palliative care for 3 months before death. Fifty eight specialists (71.6%) responded that hospice and palliative care help controlling the patient's psychological symptoms before all. Conclusion: While most doctors recognize the need of hospice and palliative care for patients with terminal ranter, their attitude toward hospice and palliative care was rather reserved. We suggest that continuing education, information and promotion for hospice and palliative care should be provided for doctors.

환자 및 가족과 팀원 간의 의사소통

문도호,Mun, Do-Ho 한국호스피스협회 2006 호스피스 학술지 Vol.6 No.1

병원에서 임종을 맞이한 호스피스 환자의 임상적 고찰

문도호,최화숙,Mun, Do-Ho,Choe, Hwa-Suk 한국호스피스협회 2003 호스피스 학술지 Vol.3 No.2

Purpose: The appropriate duration for effective hospice care is estimated about 3 months. However, the length of hospice care of many hospice patients is mostly less than 1 months. This is too short for effective hospice care. Therefore we investigated the reason by clinical considuations include the length of hospie care, duration from diagnosed as terminatlly ill to refer to hospice, the recogntion of hospice of doctors, patients and familis. Methods: This study was designed to retrospective cohot study. The data was obtaind from 50 hospice patients those who died in hospital from July to September in 2003. Results: Out of 50 patient, 30 were male(60%). The median age wes 60years in males and was 61 years in femailes. The most prevalant cancer was colorectal cancer(9 patients, 18%), followed by hepatoma(8 patients, 16%), and stomach cancer(7 patients, 14%). The most prevalent symptom was pain(37 patients 74%) and most prevalant reason of admission was also pain(30 patients, 60%). The most prevalent physician specialty was general internal medicine(21 doctors, 42%), followed by oncology(19 doctors, 38%). The median days form diagnosed terminally ill to refere to hospice was 47 days. The median lengths of hospice care was 23 days and the median admission days was 17. Conclusion: We found that lack of recognition of hospice of doctors, patients and families made the lengths of hospice care too short. If the patient and family go to hospice just after diagnosed as terminally ill, they could get more effective hospice care. To resolve these problems, it is needed education for them constantly.