http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
마이클 로버츠 경상국립대학교 사회과학연구원 2020 마르크스주의 연구 Vol.17 No.1
Lefteris Tsoulfidis and Persefoni Tsaliki provide a convincing and robust theoretical analysis of capitalism. But strangely, they see Marxian economics as a strand of classical political economy, not as a critical attack on classical economics, as Marx did. Indeed, the authors are at their most convincing when they develop Marxian theory in contrast to classical and neoclassical analyses. They show that in modern capitalism, it is profit and the profitability of capital that rules; not consumption, not competition or monopoly. Crises in capitalism have intrinsic causes and therefore are not conjectural and in this sense are inevitable.
리 M. 로버츠 국제언어인문학회 2014 인문언어 Vol.16 No.1
Following the Reichspogromnacht of 9-10 November 1938, widely known under the Nazi euphemism Kristallnacht, Shanghai witnessed the influx of nearly 20,000 German-speaking Jews. Among these exiles were the Jewish-Austrian writers Hans Schubert and Mark Siegelberg who authored and staged two dramas: Die Masken fallen (The Masks Fall), which played at the British embassy in Shanghai on 9 November 1940, presents an Aryan German man and his Nazi lawyer who pressure an Aryan German woman to divorce her Jewish husband, until finally the couple flees to Shanghai. Fremde Erde (Foreign Soil), performed through EJAS (European Jewish Artist Society) on 8 and 10 April 1941, portrays a Jewish-Austrian couple exiled in Shanghai. The husband was once a successful physician who cannot find enough money to open a new medical practice in Shanghai until his wife sells her body to a wealthy Chinese man. Despite the seemingly countless hardships the exiles face in Shanghai, the greatest impediment to this couple’s recovery turns out to be their own racism, the very force that caused the Nazis to expel them so violently from Europe. The relatively small amount of scholarship on theater in the exiled community in Shanghai has suggested that these exiles produced primarily apolitical dramas for entertainment, due to fear of potential negative reactions from both the Nazis and also the occupying Japanese military. This article explains, however, how these two plays take a political stance on the Western racism of the day in their portrayal of relationships between so-called Aryan Germans, Jews, and Asians. Against the background of both the racial distinctions established during the colonial period and also the “Nuremberg Law for the Protection of German Blood and Honor,” which in 1935 legalized the idea that interracial relationships weakened German purity and thus impacted German-speaking Jews and their Aryan partners, the depiction of mixed relationships in these two plays suggests that the authors were thumbing their noses at the West’s mistreatment of anyone considered foreign to the national community. Together, the two plays communicate changes in European notions of a mixed marriage as a union between two people with different religions to one of racial comingling. Interestingly, the authors do not spare even the Jewish exiles in their critique of Western racism, for in the Shanghai of Foreign Soil only the labels used to identify the exiles as Jewish distinguish them from anyone else who might have grown up in the German-speaking culture of the time. Moreover, in the character of the physician/husband in Foreign Soil we find an additional critique of the natural sciences as part of the West’s racist discourse. As a physician, this man should have been aware of how various academic disciplines that founded Western medicine in the first half of the twentieth century had been used not only against non-whites but also against him and his wife, but his reactions to his wife’s relationship with a Chinese man prove his initial blindness to the racism inherent in his own German culture.