金哲埈(1923~1989)의 한국사 서술과 역사의식

김두진(Kim, Doo-jin) 북악사학회 2020 북악사론 Vol.11 No.-

한국 근대사학사에 대해서는 상당히 많은 연구가 진척되었지만, 대부분 일제강점기에 치우친 감이 없지 않다. 민족주의사학에 대한 연구는 어느 정도 이루어졌으나 상대적으로 실증주의사학이나 사회경제사학 또는 그 밖의 연구경향에 대해서는 거의 연구되지 못했다. 근래에 광복 후 1세대 역사학자들의 사론에 대한 관심이 크게 일어났다. 이들에 대한 연구는 10년 전까지만 해도 생존해 있던 인물을 대상으로 하기 때문에, 객관적인 접근을 어렵게 한다. 이들 중 이기백과 김철준은 한국고대사를 체계화하는데 도움을 주었으며, 그들의 연구 방법은 한국 현대사학의 성립에 상당한 역할을 담당하였다. 이 글에서는 우선 김철준의 사론을 우선적으로 밝히고자 한다. 김철준은 실증주의사학을 확립시킨 이병도나 김상기·손진태 등의 영향을 받았지만, 문헌고증학적 학풍을 비판하면서 불교학이나 고고학·인류학 등 인접 학문의 이론을 도입하여 한국고대사를 연구하였다. 또한 그는 새로운 문화의 유입으로 격변하는 역사의 전환기에 대해 주목하여, 그로 인해 일어나는 신구문화의 갈등을 절충하려는 노력을 중시하였다. 한국고대 사회는 부족국가에서 부족연맹을 거쳐 고대국가(중앙집권적 귀족국가)로의 발전 단계를 거쳤다. 그런 과정에서 족장세력을 편제하면서 국가체제가 정비됨으로써, 골품제와 같은 신분제 사회를 이루었다는 주장은 이후 한국고대사 연구에 많은 영향을 주었다. 김철준은 민족주의 문화사관을 내세워 민족문화를 비판적으로 인식함으로써, 오히려 전통문화의 총체적 역량을 신뢰하였다. 왜냐하면 전통문화가 충분하게 축적되어 있으면, 자기문화를 비판하더라도 더 훌륭한 문화가 얼마든지 존재하기 때문이다. 그리하여 여러 문화요소가 총체적으로 모아지는 광장으로서의 민족문화 역량을 강조하면서, 그 내에 포함된 전통문화의 잠재능력에 대한 무한한 신뢰를 가졌다. 그러나 사회과학의 이론을 원용한 연구방법은 당대의 사회상과는 동떨어진 허상을 설정할 가능성이 있기 때문에, 반드시 바람직한 것은 아니다. 다만 그가 민족문화를 거시적으로 파악하면서, 정통문화가 나아갈 방향을 제시하려고 노력한 점은 주목된다. Many researches about Korean modern histography have been progressed, but it is also true that most of the studies focused on Japanese imperialism. The historical study of nationalism has established in a certain fashion, on the other hand, historical studies about Positivism, social economy, and other various studies were not investigated properly. Recently, after the restoration of independence in Korea, the interest about the historical studies of the first generation of historians grew big. The investigation about those first generation of historians were based on the existed people until 10 years ago, which made difficult to access them objectively. Among them, Lee, Gi-Baek and Kim, Cheol-Jun helped to systemize the Korean ancient history and their study method played an important role in an establishment of the study of modern history. In this written document, the historical study of Kim, Cheol-Jun will be discussed primarily. Kim, Cheol-Jun was influenced by Lee, Byung-Do, Kim, Sang-Gi, Son, Jin-Tae, etc., who established a study of Positivism. However, he studied Korean ancient history by criticizing the academic tradition of the philological methodology of historical research and introducing theories such as Buddhism, archeology, anthropology, etc. In addition, he focused on the convulsion of the historical transition which occurred through the inflow of new culture, and tried to compromise conflicts between the old and the new culture. The ancient Korean society had developed through the tribe nation, the tribe alliance, and to the ancient national anthem (a centralized authoritarian aristocrat nation). Kim s statement that Korea established a hierarchical social system by mandating national organization throughout formating tribe power, influenced on further studies about ancient Korean history. Kim, Cheol-un rather trusted the whole capacity of traditional culture by critically recognizing a part of the national culture. The reason is if traditional culture is accumulated enough, it will embrace many other good cultural elements even though he criticized a part of the culture. In other words, while he focused on the capacity of national culture which gathers various cultural elements into one, he also trusted in traditional culture embracing potential capacities. On the other hand, a study of methods claiming a theory of social science is n ot necessarily d esirable, because it has a p ot ent ialit y t o creat e a false image. It merely is worthy to note that he tried to bring up the future way of traditional culture by recognizing national culture in a comprehensive view.

『삼국유사』의 인용문과 그 성격

김두진(Kim Doo-Jin) 한국사학회 2004 史學硏究 Vol.- No.76

Samgukyusa(三國遺事) gives a feeling that whole book was composed with quotations so many people observed those quotes. The reason is there is not that many documents have been left through out Korean history, this literature which contains quotes has been observed by many people. There were some quotes included in Samguksagi(三國史記) but quotes in Samgukyusa shows better picture of actual literature about ancient Korea.<br/> Samgukyusa includes many stories that have been passed through out pageants like. Even though those documents like Gogi or Hyangjun(鄕傳) has been included stories about ancient Korean gods, Ilyun(一然) accepted that these documents are reasonable. Gogi's quotes are saying that Korea was established by sainte; or gods so thar Dangun(檀君) and Founder of Three Kingdom had to be described as a form of god or saints. This has an intention that it needs to recognize the tradition of Koreans culture and to find the lights how Korean history has been developed.<br/> Even though Samgukyusa included some quotes from ancient documents of China, most of them were written by referring Korean documents, Ancient documents of China was quoted to describe ancient rime of Korea which has not been spread out to the public. Out of many documents that has been recorded within Korea, many documents were used to describe the ancient time of Korea like Dangungi(檀君記) and Dongmyunggi(東明記) but out of many documents, Samguksa(三國史) and Guksa(國史) was referred the most. Other documents like Silla-bongi(新羅本紀), Koguryo-bongi(高句麗本紀), and Peakche-bongi(百濟本紀) were referred also, but these documents have same style how it has been written like Samguksa and Guksa, We cannot be sure that those quotes the(have been referred in Samguksa and Cuksa are indicates to Kim-Busik's Sanguksagi and most likely, most of them are documents that have been written before Sanguksagi were established.<br/> If we say that quotes that Sangukusa included has been used to emboss the history of Silla, ancient documents of China was used to emboss the history of Koguryo or Peakche out of those three counties which are Silla, Koguryo and Peakche. These parts of history have been included in Samguksagi also. Unlikely Samguksagi, Samgukyusa quoted from documents of Buddhism, old ancient documents, and epitaph, Most of the documents that have been used to write Samgukyusa were old ancient documents that has been handed down by temple but other documents like Sajukgi(史蹟記), which is documents about Buddhism, were used also, Those old ancient documents shows that historical facts of three kingdom period has been influenced Koryo(高麗) period and also, it shows the point of view of people in Koryo period and how they looked back at history of their own and the history of countries existed before their country.

초소형 초광각 비구면 유리렌즈의 초정밀 연삭가공기술에 관한 연구

김두진,유경선,현동훈,Kim, Doo-Jin,Yoo, Kyung-Sun,Hyun, Dong-Hoon 한국생산제조학회 2010 한국생산제조학회지 Vol.26 No.2

This research's goal is to process directly aspherics with big sagment and thin center thickness. If we can process directly aspherics with big sagment and thin center thickness, we think it greatly helps to reduce the time of developing optical system. We made very thin glass using diamond grinding whetstone regarding the trace of tool and the detailed drawing of tool super precisive aspherics that has 0.46mm center thickness and over $30^{\circ}$ segment, $0.1{\mu}m$ machining accuracy, 15nm surface accuracy. We think this research's result will be effective to open new market because it is applied not only cell phone optical system but also CCTV robot optical system, internet phone optical system. Also we expect to enhance the super strong brittle precisive process's possibility with super precisive processing technique that achieves 0.46mm glass center thickness as first in the world.

라말려초 (羅末麗初) 동리산문의 (桐裏山門) 성립과 그 사상 - 풍수지리사상에 대한 재검토 -

김두진 (Doo Jin Kim) 연세대학교 국학연구원 1988 동방학지 Vol.57 No.-

N/A

義湘의 中道實際思想

金杜珍(Kim Doo-jin) 역사학회 1993 역사학보 Vol.139 No.-

한류의 초국적 보편성과 ‘미디어 제국주의 역전’ 테제

김두진(Kim Doo-Jin) 고려대학교 아세아문제연구소 2018 亞細亞硏究 Vol.61 No.1

1990년대 이후 최근까지 대중음악에 대한 새로운 국제적 담론을 근거로 종래의 ‘문화 제국주의’의 명제에 대한 반발로 ‘제 3 세계’의 음악적 실천들을 포스트-제국적(post-imperial) 유형으로 보는 성향이 나타나고 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 문화 우세종(cultural dominant)이라 할 수 있는 영국 비틀즈 음악의 ‘British invasion’과 비교하여, 최근 유럽을 겨냥한 한류, 특히 K-pop의 월경(越境) 현상을 ‘미디어 제국주의의 역전’(reverse media imperialism)으로 볼 수 있는 가를 검토하고자 한다. K-pop의 속성은 수준 높은 혼종문화의 생성을 목적으로 다양한 외래문화의 글로컬(glocal)적 융합을 수반한 혼종화의 한 형태이다. 한류의 출현을 ‘문화제국주의의 역전’의 현상으로 보거나, 미국과 같은 서구의 지배력과 헤게모니의 약화로 보는 관점은 과장된 측면이 있다. 한류가 서구 문화 제국성과 유사한 잠재성이 인정되는 측면이 있다 할지라도, K-pop 한류에 의한 ‘미디어 제국주의의 역전’(reverse media imperialism)의 가능성은 현재로는 높지 않다. 영국 비틀즈의 음악의 사회문화적 규범(canon)에서 볼 때, 문화 제국주의의 ‘중심부의 문화적 강제’(imposition)의 잠재력이 잔존하고 있다는 담론이 우세한 것으로 본다. 이에 비해 K-pop 한류는 소위 ‘아시아적 생산양식’의 지구화로서 차별화된 궤적에 머물게 됨을 인지해야 한다. K-pop의 한류 산업 정책 및 한류 문화의 확장성의 잠재력을 전지구적 차원에서 획일적으로(holistically) 평가하려는 편향성에서 벗어날 필요가 있다. K-pop의 초국적 보편성이 특정국가 내로의 한류의 문화적 확장성으로 볼 수 있는 여지는 있다. 유의할 점은 최근 한류의 보편성의 지구화 성향이 의미심장한 것이라 할지라도, 한류의 영국 월경(越境)의 경우 포스트-비틀즈의 규범성(canon)에 기초한 제국성(imperialness)의 저항을 간과할 수 없을 것이다. The Korean Wave often argues for faster and stronger invasion into East Asian countries, further European countries in cultural sense. K-pop has often come to the logic that Korea has finally entered the Center. Until most recently, combined with the controversy on a more aggressive cultural imperialism, it is assumed that the Korean wave has an aspect of ‘reverse media imperialism,’ reflecting a new dichotomy of us/center and them/periphery. Some argue that the Korean Wave may be seen as a new cultural dominant at the international dimension, thus paving the way for cultural hegemony even in Europe e.g. the UK. The orthodoxy in popular music studies has supported cross-fertilization through the process of hybridization or transculturation between the global and the local. We posit that the Korean Wave is considered another type of glocalization/hybridity deriving from the dominant mode of cultural flow in advanced countries. In the light of ‘British Invasion’, the Beatles was crucial in establishing the importance of rock as a social phenomenon as unprecedented or overwhelming rather than a transient cultural force in the UK. The Beatles still tends to enjoy a canonical status as ‘zeitgeist’ consisting of British social culture as a whole, proving their durability as leaders that has served as a vehicle of British cultural imperialism. The Beatles legacy continues to endure, because the music itself has a quality of timelessness that allows it to be passed from generation to generation. while the Korean wave may be seen as a new dominating core of cultural flow even in the UK, the potentials of British imperialness on the post-Beatles should be carefully considered.

동계학술대회 : 공정거래위원회의 사건처리절차와 관련된 제 문제 : 공정거래위원회의 제재 내용의 방향성에 관한 연구 -시정명령을 중심으로-

김두진 ( Doo Jin Kim ) 한국경쟁법학회 2010 競爭法硏究 Vol.21 No.-

If the competition authority detects an entity committing competition law violation, it can pursue administrative proceedings to investigate, prohibit and sanction anti-competitive behavior. The main focus of this article is on the content of the remedies, especially Corrective Measures by the Korea Fair Trade Commission (hereinafter "KFTC"). I discuss on the desirable content of competition authority`s remedies which are most appropriate for innovation. My concern is about which content the KFTC`s Corrective Measures should have and under which condition the KFTC has to intervene in the firm`s business practices. As for the optimum market structure for promoting innovation competition, there have been disputes between the Schumpeterians and the followers of Kenneth Arrow. The Schumpeterian viewpoint suggests that market dominant firms and monopolists may be more innovative than firms in competitive markets by virtue of their size and capacity. However the opposite party tackles them by defying that a monopolist bears a opportunity cost when innovating that an innovating competitor does not. I agree with the latter because if market dominant firms and monopolists are sheltered from competitive pressure, they will probably try to innovate only to the extent necessary for guarding their status. The amount of innovation by firms in competitive markets could be expected to increase by competition policy. So does the amount of innovation by market dominant firms and monopolists. Citing Professor Jonathan Baker, the competition authority`s intervention should be focused on industry settings and categories of behavior where enforcement can promote innovation. He reasonably and rationally argues that an competition policy aimed at fostering innovation would challenge practices that directly reduce innovation competition regardless of industry. For example, competition authority should attack agreements among innovation rivals not to conduct R&D, undertaken with no legitimate justification. Innovation competition can also be promoted by remedies to restrictions on competition in technology markets. Competition authority`s intervention to foster product market competition in "winner-take-most" or "winner-take-all" markets, including many high-tech markets, can be expected in general to benefit innovation. Enforcing the competition law to protect product market competition can be expected to benefit innovation in the type of industry in which the extent of future product market competition is likely to be unaffected by the extent of current product market competition because of probable technological or regulatory developments. All these comments seem to give us very important implication for competition policy. After all, like other competition authority such as the Federal Trade Commission in US, the KFTC should have and exercise broad discretion to choose the advisable content of structural or behavioral remedies that may improve innovation competition.

마이크로비트와 스마트폰과의 연동을 이용한 스마트 도우미 우산 구현

김두진(Doo-Jin Kim),김동영(Dung-Youg Kim),류진수(Jin-Su Ryu),권구락(Goo-Rak Kwon) 한국통신학회 2018 한국통신학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.2018 No.11

義湘 華嚴思想 硏究의 현황과 전망

金杜珍(Kim Doo-jin) 역사학회 1994 역사학보 Vol.142 No.-

한국 ‘식민지 근대화’ 논쟁과 ‘근대성’ 인식의 재검토 : 근대성 개념의 간학문적 논의를 중심으로

김두진(Kim, Doo-Jin) 고려대학교 아세아문제연구소 2019 亞細亞硏究 Vol.62 No.4

한국의 근대성에 관한 논의는 한국 사회에 적지 않은 정치적 함의를 던져 줄 만큼 무거운 역사적 쟁점이 되어 왔다. 부인할 수 없는 사실은, ‘수탈론’과 ‘식민지 근대론’의 이분법적 인식론적 논쟁은 양측 모두 그동안 상당 부분 설득력과 의미 있는 학문적 성과를 가져왔다는 사실이다. 본 연구에서는 「식민지 수탈」과 「식민지 근대화」간의 기존의 지적 논쟁을 간학문적(間學問的) 논의 -여타 사회과학의 인식의 맥락에서- 를 통해서 근대성 개념의 인식론적 접근의 지향점을 재검토하고자 한다. 이를 위해 사전적(事前的) 작업으로 한국 식민지 근대성 논쟁을 둘러싼 기존 비판적 논의의 지적 계보 (혹은 흐름)를 개괄적으로 살펴보았다. ‘수탈론’과 ‘식민지 근대성’ 간의 논란을 진전시키기 위해 본 논문에서는 ‘근대성’ 개념에 관한 해석을 복합적 시각과 분석의 맥락에서 다루고자 한다. 본 연구에서는 식민지 근대성 논의의 시발을 ‘단수의 근대성’ 혹은 ‘일국(一國)의 근대성’의 이해를 넘어서 ‘다중 근대성’(multiple modernities)이라는 개념을 제시하고자 한다. 식민지 근대화론과 관련하여, 식민지 근대성의 현상을 ‘단수’의 근대성을 넘어서 ‘전지구적 근대성’ 내지 ‘다양한 근대성’으로 이해하고자 한다. 이것은 ‘일국적 근대성’(national modernity)을 넘어서 트랜스내셔널 히스토리(transnational histiory)의 관점에서 재검토해야 함을 의미하기도 한다. 트랜스내셔널 히스토리의 역사서술은 ‘국민국가’ 혹은 ‘민족’의 중요성을 간과하는 것이 아니다. 트랜스내셔널 히스토리는 하나의 ‘패러다임’이라기보다는 하나의 ‘지향점’의 성격을 제시한다. ‘다중 근대성’의 성격은 종전의 서구학자의 전통적 근대성 개념을 거부하는 차별성을 드러낸다. 비서구의 다양한 근대성들(modernities)은 ‘통시적’(通時的), ‘동시적’(同時的) 및 ‘비동시적’(非同時的) 운동의 상호 작용의 결과로 나타난다. 이런 맥락에서 ‘수탈론’과 ‘식민지 근대성’ 간의 부단한 논란이 ‘근대성’ 개념의 다원적(plural) 시각과 분석의 맥락에서 다루어질 때, 이분법적 시각 간의 접점의 범위가 보다 넓혀질 것으로 예상된다. Discussing the question of whether Japanese rule contributed to the modernization of Korea is much likely to be problematic. Should the idea of modernization continue to possess heavy political implications ? In comparison with the concept of modernity as fixed, unified or universal progress, it is often suggested that we posit a multiplicity of kinds and fields of modernity, and attempt to discern features of modernization rather than defining the nature of progress on the basis of one or two criteria. The notion of ‘multiple modernities’ may denote a certain view of colonial modernization in Korean society similar to the actual developments in modernizing non-Western societies. In Korean humanities circle, particular attention has been paid to the discourse on ‘colonial modernity’ vs ‘exploitation theory’, thus leading to the accumulation of the scholarly reinterpretations related to colonial modernity in the fields of Korean history. Korean nationalist historians presuppose an archetype of “Western modernity” on which colonial domination was based. The nationalist narratives remain prevalent in the colonial intellectual fashions they contest. By contrast, we argue that the varieties of modernity needs to be recognized in the context of interdisciplinary research, including transnational history perspective. The notion of ‘global modernity’ or ‘multiple modernities’ should be addressed to move away from the excessively value-laden use of the modernity. It is not sufficient to trace modernity as a linear movement of modern developments. Rather, recognition of modernities as the interplay of diachronic, synchronic and desynchronic actions should be carefully incorporated. We assume that the recognition of plural modernities allows us to better understand the controversy on colonial modernization. The idea of global modernity enables both Korean historiography circles to redefine varieties of modernites that go beyond their conventional perception on colonial modernization.