http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 고재설 (검색결과 13 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
고재설 한국언어문화교육학회 2020 언어와 문화 Vol.16 No.1
The purpose of this study is to define the relative word orders of Korean adnominals. In order to accomplish this aim, I subclassify adnominals into nominal-adnominals and predicative-adnominals at first, then into the traditional subclassifications as demonstrative, numeric and attributive adnominals. I argue that my subclassification gives more accurate explanations for some exceptional word order problems among many adnominals which are not solved till now. That is, while nominal-adnominals have relatively fixed syntactic positions as demonstratives - numerics - attributives respectably in their order, predicative-adnominals are not the same as that. Some predicative-adnominals observe the relative word order, but others do not. They are free in their syntactic positions, and these kinds of adnominals also show peculiar syntactic behaves which are not mentioned till now. That is, they can be conjugated with adjectives, be replaced by proform, and be modified by adverbs. These extraordinary phenomena are explained also. .
-
고재설 한국언어문학교육학회 2016 한어문교육 Vol.35 No.-
The aim of this study is twofold. For one thing, I argue that the cognate objects in Korean are made by suffix ‘-um(-음)’ from verbs. No other suffixes can make cognate objects by reasons of the lexical meaning of itself. Suffix ‘-um’ only has no other lexical meaning except the function of making derived nouns that only denote the name of the action the verbal bases denote, which must be the charistic feature of cognate objects in Korean, I argue. For the next thing, I studied the two kinds of cognate object constructions; the intransitive ones and the transitive ones. The intransitive cognate object constructions have the same configurational structure as the regular transitive verbal constructions. So the syntactic behaviors of the cognate objects of intransitive cognate object constructions are very similar to the objects of regular transitive verbal constructions. But they are not the same in thematic roles especially. The transitive cognate object constructions have some peculiar syntactic property, and some aspects of them are considered.
-
-
-
-
고재설 우석대학교 국어국문학연구회 1998 又石語文 Vol.8 No.-
Koh, Jae-Sol. 1996. On Adjective 'ha-'. Linguistics 4, 25-44. Adjective 'ha-' in Korean shows many functions. It was regarded, therefore, as a suffix, bound-adjective, adjective, conjunctional adverb, and pro-verbal element, according to it's environment. This paper argues that all of those forms of 'ha-'- must be regarded as a single morpheme, an adjective, in order to reduce the burden on lexicon. All of those functions are considered to be possible by the lexical property of 'ha-', which lacks unique lexical meaning but has only adjectival function. Presupposing generative morphology and syntax 'tut ha-' construction is analyzed to have empty subject 'e', which means 'situation' roughly. Then the unique status of 'ha-' is also analyzed, compared with normal adjectives. To cetify the status of adjective 'ha-', morphological and syntactic constructions in which 'ha-' appears are testified. (Woosuk University)
-
-
고재설 대한언어학회 1996 언어학 Vol.4 No.-
Koh, Jae-Sol. 1996. On Adjective ‘ha-’. Linguistics 4, 25-44. Adjective ‘ha-’ in Korean shows many functions. It was regarded, therefore, as a suffix, bound-adjective, adjective, conjunctional adverb, and pro-verbal element, according to it's environment. This paper argues that all of those forms of 'ha-' must be regarded as a single morpheme, an adjective, in order to reduce the burden on lexicon. All of those functions are considered to be possible by the lexical property of 'ha-', which lacks unique lexical meaning but has only adjectival function. Presupposing generative morphology and syntax, 'tut ha-' construction is analyzed to have empty subject 'e', which means 'situation' roughly. Then the unique status of 'ha-' is also analyzed, compared with normal adjectives. To certify the status of adjective 'ha-', morphological and syntactic constructions in which 'ha-' appears are testified. (Woosuk University)
-
고재설 대한언어학회 2000 언어학 Vol.8 No.1
Koh, Jae-Sol. 2000. Reduced forms in conjugated constructions. Linguistics 8-1, 39-58. When two nouns are conjugated, they can be reduced to a short form in some cases('선배(와) 후배'==>'선후배') and they cannot be in another cases('선배(과) 학생' ==> '*선학생') if they have common morpheme. The aim of this paper is to search for the conditions of this kind of reduction. I argue in this paper that this reduction is conditioned structurally and semantically. The structural condition is that the two nouns must have the form [AX][BX]('선배(와) 후배') or [XA][XB] ('국내(와) 국외'). The semantic conditions are more complicated and vague. The major conditions between AX and BX are oppositeness, similarity, consecutiveness, and separation relation. Whether the reduced forms can be considered to be words and listed in the lexicon is speculated also.(Woosuk Uinversity)
KCI연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
