地方自治에 있어서 地方財政의 문제점과 신장방안

高忠錫 濟州大學校 社會發展硏究所 1990 社會發展硏究 Vol.1 No.-

新冷戰에서의 美國의 對韓政策 分析

高忠錫,鄭義淳 濟州大學校 이데올로기批判敎育硏究會 1983 이데올로기연구논총 Vol.1 No.-

地方自治 4年의 評價와 發展方向

高忠錫 濟州大學校 法과 政策硏究所 1995 法과 政策 Vol.- No.1

제주지역 주민들의 開發事業 參與를 위한 組織模型에 관한 연구 : 협동조합방식을 중심으로

高忠錫 濟州大學敎 行政大學院 1994 濟行論叢 Vol.2 No.-

韓國 政治發展에 관한 硏究 : 評價와 時角 Appraisal and Perspective

高忠錫 제주대학 1980 논문집 Vol.12 No.2

Lucian W. Pye suggested equality, capacity and differentiation as a political development syndrome, and noted that this syndrome is the core of the development process. In particular, it is my opinion that the Third Republic concentrated it's concern on capacity as political development, and ignored equality. It could establish economic development, but failed to distribute wealth effectively and equally. therefore, for last eighteen years, political uneasiness has been exposed explicitly and implicitly. Fred W. Riggs pointed that the balance between constitutive system(e. g. lggislature, party, vote), and public administrative system which is characterized by hierarchy of authority is the essential part of the best developmental type of political systems. Namely, he assumed that equality is achieved by the operation of a constitutive system and that capacity is achieved by a public administrative system. He contends that the break of balance between the two systems would check integration and lead to political uneasiness and in a worst case lead to political collapse. In view of this, and for the sake of stable political development, I think we must orient the integration of differentiation on entire political system level and promote balance and harmony bewteen political capacity and demands for equality. We can accomplish this only through democratization based on political pluralism.

政策科學의 生成背景과 主要領域 : 政策科學의 序說的 考察을 爲하여 with A Prelude to Policy Sciences

高忠錫 제주대학 1979 논문집 Vol.11 No.1

We are living in the age of scientific revolution through daily life and social activity. Though sciences are making rapid development, we find that many problems are left to be solved and their facets and characteristics show a tendency to be more complicated than ever before. What are the reasons why these situations take place? Where can we find the ways to tide over this crisis? Policy Sciences must be able to give adequate answers for these inquiries and to provide th means to solve those problems. Generally, contemporary sciences are unable to meet the urgent policymaking needs. And, particularly, the two other clusters of sciences, namely, the behavioral sciences and the management sciences, presumed to be directly applicable for improvlement of policymaking, have also fundamental weaknesses. This inadequacy of sciences to advance policymaking is not the result of underdevelopment of one discipline or another; rather, this inadequacy is built into the very characteristics of contemporary sciences. Therefore, if we want significantly to increase the contributions of sciences for better policy making, a new scientific approach is necessary. And findings on the necessity of new paradigms for a new Policy Sciences are not a substitute for the need to accelerate progress of parts of contemporary sciences. Since Policy Sciences were advocated by Harold D. Lasswell in 1951, there have been some endeavors to develop it. Nevertheless, we can say that Policy Sciences have not been made any remarkable development, but, at last, they have been turned down detail case study for nearly two decades. Recently, Yehezkel Dror emphasized the necessity and revival of Policy Sciences, trying to establish its unique concept with paradigms. Policy Sciences has come to attract our attention again and to provide its own foundation for further advancement. However, we have many barriers to overcome in Policy Sciences that may be endemic to the characteristics of Policy Sciences themselves, in science community, in policymaking community, and in society at large. In addition, when we try to research Policy Sciences theoritically and to apply them actually to the present situation in Korea, we will be faced with a few more obstacles as follows: (1) Deficiency of democratic mode in life and thought of both of people and leaders; lack of rationality which does not admit the setting of the base for Policy Sciences to be grown up. (2) Moral corruption: confusion between private and public interests which will be a great obstacle to theoritical research and practical application of Policy Sciences. (3) Technology lag and insufficient facilities for quantitative approach. (4) Survival of pre-modem bureaucratic tendency in policy-making community which reflects strong resistances against adoptation of innovation or changes. These are difficulties for development and application of Policy Sciences. But we should try to surmount the hinderances, and, if we make a progress in Policy Sciences by even a small result, it will be easy for us to overcome the barriers in proportion to the amount of the results. Thus, we will have a socalled "Magic Circle." It is unsatisfactory that this thesis could not provide the core of Policy Sciences in detail but the present descriptive introduction of works of the other scholars. However, Policy Sciences are still in the state of premature, herefore it would be rather important to understand the basic concept and methodology of Policy Sciences and then to organi2 e any creative works.

行政學의 Identity-crisis의 解決을 위한 試圖와 評價

高忠錫 제주대학 1981 논문집 Vol.13 No.2

"What is Public administration? " has teen long Pointed out as Identity Crisis by many social scientists. The scholars trying to solve such an Identity Crisis could he divided into several groups. But in this study I will focus only on two groups. Firstly; scholars like Dwight waldo and Frederick Mosher take the position that public administration should give up its autonomous disipline. Secondly; scholars like Herbert Simon and Martin Landau assert that the basic domain of Public administration should be based on decision-marking: Process, seeking after its scientism. The former takes a attitude not to solve the problem, but to avoid it, abandoning public administration. A much of interdisciplinaly nature in public administration should not lead us to consider public administration as undiscipline. Especially in studying public administration, the professional perspective of Waldo is regarded as appropriate, when administration is thought of as art. But Waldo's perspective doesn't seem to be appreciated when we try to understand administration from the view of theoretical and scientific scholarship. The reason is that professionalism is contrary to science. Even though we consider it as right that excessive emphasis on theory brings about the result unable to explain what it is, we should understand the fact that scholars engaged in studying at a lot of productive theories. Furthermore, when practical scholarship can not explain not only its scientific feature but also its practical one, scholars will not find the place to stand on. So, it is important problem that public administration should be based on autonomous discipline, and emphasize its scientism. To establish this great purpose, we should build the focus of public administration, besides developing several theories.

동구공산주의체제의 변화와 성격

고충석 濟州大學校 이데올로기批判敎育硏究會 1987 이데올로기연구논총 Vol.5 No.-

제주지역 주민들의 開發事業 參與를 위함 組織模型은 가능한가

高忠錫 濟州大學敎 行政大學院 1997 濟行論叢 Vol.5 No.-

선형계획기법(Linear Programming)에 관한 연구

고충석,이병철 제주대학교 1986 논문집 Vol.16 No.1

One of the most fundamental of the decisions a public administrator must make is the determination of how scarce resources should be allocated to competing activities. These scarce resources may be budgeted dollars, land for housing, manpower, equipment, or any other factor over which the administrator exercises control. Linear programming is concerned with the basic problem of the allocation of scarce resources. The purpose of this paper is to point out the problems and the major issues which are intimately related to apply Linear programming to real policy problem situation in the past and present in order to provide an effective and efficient framework, rather than to attempt any specific policy prescriptions and testing hypothetical propositions. Several other studies have used Linear programming to test hypothetical propositions and specific policy prescriptions. These studies have had unique analytic viewpoints and perspectives. They helped to improve Linear programming. Therefore, according to unique analytic viewpoint, this paper examines the role of quantitative analyses in public administration and decision making. Throughout this presentations several key features of the palper should be noted. First, this paper is tried to introduce the concepts of Linear programming as they relate to public administration. Second, the evaluation of quantitative analyses will be examined in light of the different levels of decisions a public administrator must make. Third, it is oriented toward the scientific method of problem solving and expands the steps involved in public problem solving. The final feature of the paper that should be noted is that each discussion of a model presents an analysis of how the model should be developed, a discussion of specific public oriented case studies(example problems), and an analysis of the potential/shortcomings of Linear programming model in public administration. The methodology adopted is based on the literature-survey. A review of the literature on Linear programming revealed a substantial methodologicall-especialy, hypothetical assumptions-shortcomings. These shortcomings are following as ; 1. Linearity 2. Additivity 3. Divisibility 4. Finiteness 5 Certainty and Static time period 6. Non-monetary performance ignorance For solving these shortcomings, this paper presents some ideas. A major conclusion is that Linear programming has varied according to the specific situations of policy pattern that were involved. Therefore, Linear programming application must flexibly consider the real specific policy situations. If this assumption is accepted, we think, The future of Linear programming application is very optimistic.