RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
          펼치기
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Sports Agency Contract and the related Legal Issues

        진홍 한국스포츠엔터테인먼트법학회 2017 스포츠와 법 Vol.20 No.4

        The Korean sports industry has developped so rapidly along with the peoples’ interest in the leisure culture, that its volume has amounted to 41 trillion Korean Won as of 2016. This figure outnumberd twice the revenue of the tourist industry. Notwithstanding such a progress, unlike the western world such as the U.S., the Korean sports industry could not overcome the poor environment in terms of protecting athletes’ rights and interests. This seems to demonstrate that laws and regulations related to sports agents, whom are supposed to perform for the protection of the athletes’ rights and interests, are still falling short compared to the western world. Even with the Sports Industry Promotion Act, which has been enforced on 4th August 2016, the act does not have specific and detailed regulations on the sports agents. As such, a question arises as to whether current laws regarding to the relationship between sports agents and athletes are proportinately regulated. If so, the principles related to the relationship between sports agents and athletes should be relied and interpereted based on the Korean Civil Code as a general norm. However, even though the Korean Civil Code could be relied on, the complicated legal problems, which might arise when the relationship between sports agents and athletes is ceased by a cancellation of the contract, should be resolved by the basic principles applied according to a special act, in order to balance their rights and obligaitons. This is because such complicated legal problems can not be resolved fully by the application of the Civil Code rather than according to a related special code. Therefore this essay has generally dealt with the sports agents system and a global trend and then scrutinized the basic principles with regard to the sports agents contract and the related legal issues when a sports agents contract is ceased, by examining relevant laws and Korean Supreme Court’s decisions.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        재산범죄의 객체로서의 게임 아이템에 대한 연구 - 게임 아이템의 절취, 손괴, 장물에 대한 재산범죄 검토 -

        진홍진 ( Jin Hong Jin ) 연세법학회(구 연세법학연구회) 2018 연세법학 Vol.32 No.-

        최근 AR, VR 등 가상현실세계를 구현하는 기술이 빠르게 발전하고 있다. 이러한 기술발전에 발맞추어 MMORPG과 같은 게임에서는 아이템을 거래할 수 있는 시스템이 생겨났다. 하지만 문제점 또한 찾을 수 있는데 시스템을 통해 아이템을 거래하는 과정에서 사기, 절도 등의 재산범죄가 발생하게 되었다. 그러므로 본 논문은 아이템의 현금거래가 현행법상 불법인지, 아이템 재산범죄에서 아이템이 재산범죄의 객체로 볼 수 있는지 검토할 것이고 나아가 아이템과 관련하여 실제로 어떤 재산범죄에 해당하는지 논하고자 한다. 이러한 검토 결과 아이템의 현금거래는 게임산업진흥에 관한 법률 및 동시행령에서 금지하고 있는 것을 대상으로 현금거래를 하지 않는다면 합법인 것으로 보고 있다. 사행성 게임에 준하는 우연성이 가미되는지 여부는 개별적으로 판단해야 한다. 다음으로는 아이템이 형법상 재산범죄의 객체가 되는지 여부에 대해서 검토를 한 결과, 재물성과 관련하여 유체성설 관리가능성설 어느 학설에 따르더라도 게임 아이템은 무체물이자 관리가능한 동력으로 볼 수 없어 재물성이 부정되었다. 게임 아이템에 대한 저작물로서의 소유권은 게임회사에 있다. 이는 아이템에 관한 이용권으로 간주되기 때문이다. 마지막으로 실제 아이템의 재산범죄와 관련하여 검토한 결과 절취행위에 대해 배임죄, 컴퓨터 등 사용사기죄가 성립됨을 확인 했고 몇 가지 조건 하에 전자기록 등 특수매체기록 손괴죄, 전자기록 등 특수매체기록의 권리행사방해죄가 성립할 수 있음을 확인했다. 과학 기술의 발전으로 앞으로의 세상은 더 빠르게 변해갈 것이고 새로운 범죄 또한 생겨날 것이다. 그러므로 이러한 범죄들을 예방하기 위해 법적제도 또한 이에 발맞추어 개정되어야 할 것이다. Recently, the technology that realizes the virtual reality world such as AR, VR etc is being rapidly developed. Along with the technical improvements, the system that enables the trading of the items in games like MMORPG was created. However, drawbacks can be found at the sam time as property crimes such as fraud and theft has also occurred in our society. Therefore, this paper examines if cash transactions of game items are illegal by the current law and the requirements to be the object of property crimes. Furthermore, this paper tries to argue what kind of property crime an offence about game items belongs to. According to the result of this examination, cash transactions of game items are legal if cash transactions on subjects that Game Industry Promotion Act prohibits are not achieved. The contingency of Speculative Game should be individually judged. Besides, game items are unable to be considered as the object of property crimes because they are not immaterial and not the properties in the Criminal Act. As for the ownership of game items, the game company possesses it since it is considered to be the right to use about an item. Last but not least, according to the examination related to the property crime of a real item, it was confirmed that the act of stealing could be admitted as malfeasance and the fraud about computer use, and it was also confirmed that under a number of conditions, the act of stealing could also be regarded as the interference with the exercise of a right about the record of special media such as the property, document or electronic record of another person. The world will be change at a much more rapid pace thanks to the progress of the scientific technology and new kinds of crimes will also emerge. Thus, the legal system must be revised in accordance with such changes in order to prevent crimes in the future.

      • KCI등재

        債權讓渡에 대한 異議를 保留하지 않은 承諾과 擔保權의 復活

        진홍 한국민사법학회 2010 民事法學 Vol.51 No.-

        Under the Korean Civil Code, the assignment of a nominative claim cannot be set up against the obligor or any other third party, unless the assignor has given notice thereof to obligor or the obligor has consented thereto. On the other hand, it can be said that when a nominative claim is assigned to a third party, a mortgage attached to it also follows therewith. There have been lots of studies and also arguments on the legal effect in respect of the Article 451 Paragraph 1, concerning the obligor's ‘consent to the assignee without reservation'. It has been admitted by Korean courts that when an obligor gives consent to an assignee without reservation he cannot set up his refutation that he had against the assignor, also against the assignee. This estoppel prohibiting an obligor from setting up his refutation has been provided for the purpose of promoting transaction on a nominative claim and of affording protection to an assignee. Therefore, it is largely accepted that the consent without reservation made by an obligor give rise to the public trust put on by an assignee. This article explored and examined various problems that may arise when the obligor makes ‘consent to assignee without reservation', by way of balancing the interest of a mortgagor, a guarantor, a third party who takes the title of the real property put on a mortgage. This article also has attempted to resolve those problems by scrutinizing the judgements rendered by Korean and Japanese Supreme Court and criticised various arguments made by a group of scholars in order to bring out fruitful discussions.

      • KCI등재

        주식회사의 이사의 보수에 대한 소고

        진홍 한국경영법률학회 2010 經營法律 Vol.20 No.3

        This Article has dealt with the executive pay in terms of its regulation and its regime by criticising various literatures and court decisions. I have tried argued, by the interpretation of Article 388 of the Commercial Code, that the simple approval of the general meeting of shareholders in the Code is incomplete and not enough to regulate the current issues in relation to managerial remunerations (including chief executive officers). It is notable that the developed countries like the United States, Germany, and Japan promulgated the relevant acts in order to regulate and control the executive pay as a realm of the Corporate Governance. They also have amended the appropriate regulation for the reasonable amount of executive pay considering their performance and the streng- thening of the disclosure obligation on the companies of the relevant information about the executive pay. In this regard, I strongly recommend that law reform have to be made to meet the current problem with regard to executive pay and the strengthening of disclosure obligation on the company by acceptance of the regime of the capital-market developed countries like the U.S. and the U.K. in order to tighten the clear and thorough Corporate Governance by the shareholders as well as invellors.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼