http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Sohn,Yul The Center for Area Studies Seoul National Univers 1996 Journal of International and Area Studies Vol.3 No.2
From a historical perspective, the central concern for industrializers was how to establish and promote the national economy. This meant the protection of strategic but infant industries from foreign competition and nurture them to be competitive.
Whither the Japanese Model? - Institutional Chang and Emergence of "Many Japans"
Yul Sohn 서울대학교 국제학연구소 2008 Journal of International and Area Studies Vol.15 No.1
Amidst a prolonged recession and financial crisis during the past ten years, Japan"s capitalism has undergone change. In what direction is it moving? Is Japan converging on the US model? Or will it maintain distinctive national characteristics? This paper argues that no single clear pattern has emerged with regard to the future of the Japanese model. Rather, Japanese firms have responded to the challenges differently over the past years. Four systems of governance have emerged. First, the traditional Japanese type of corporate governance, a relationship-based, insider-oriented form, remains in place. Second, very few are adopting a US-style, market-oriented corporate governance. Meanwhile, two emergent "hybrid" forms mix market/outsider-oriented elements with relational/insider-oriented characteristics. This means that Japan is demonstrating an increasing diversity of mechanisms of governance that prefigure "many Japans."
Attracting Neighbors: Soft Power Competition in East Asia
( Yul Sohn ) 서울대학교 행정대학원 2011 Journal of Policy Studies Vol.26 No.1
This article explores the dynamics of competition by means of soft power among two key regional states, China and Japan. It demonstrates that, in their embrace of regionalism, each has concentrated soft power on East Asian neighbors by competitively proposing regional visions that would best position it in the regional leadership stakes. China took the initiative, Japan responded quickly, and China is now striking back. This does not necessarily mean that the liberal claim that East Asia is “ripe for cooperation” is misplaced. Nor does it suggest that the realist claim of “ripe for rivalry” better represents the reality. Rather, this article argues that regional powers compete in order to attract neighbors. Since this contest involves embracing others, it is not necessarily a zero-sum game. This article evaluates the success, or lack thereof, of the two countries` efforts in order to learn what they imply for Korea.
The Abe Effect on Korea’s Trade Policy
Yul Sohn 경남대학교 극동문제연구소 2015 ASIAN PERSPECTIVE Vol.39 No.3
Prime Minister Abe Shinzo’s decision to enter talks on a Trans-Pacific Partnership has been a game changer in the competition over Asia-Pacific free-trade agreements (FTA). His move helped to create a space for multilateral, mega-FTA competition before South Korea could fully prepare and implement its "global FTA hub strategy" predicated on bilateral deals. This article provides an overview of South Korea’s evolving strategies toward FTAs and explores how it has responded to the “Abe effect.” My focus is on two challenges for South Korea in participating in the TPP: US geopolitical pressure once Japan entered negotiations, and the de facto FTA negotiations with Japan under the TPP. Dealing with Japan is an especially tall order given the troubled history of Korea-Japan economic and political relations.
The Abe Effect on South Korea`s Trade Policy
( Yul Sohn ) 경남대학교 극동문제연구소 2015 ASIAN PERSPECTIVE Vol.39 No.3
Prime Minister Abe Shinzo’s decision to enter talks on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) has been a game changer in the competition over Asia Pacific free trade agreements (FTAs). His move helped to create a space for multilateral, mega-FTA competition before South Korea could fully prepare and implement its “global FTA hub strategy” predicated on bilateral deals. In this article, I provide an overview of South Korea’s evolving strategies toward FTAs and explore how it has responded to the “Abe effect.” My focus is on two challenges for South Korea in participating in the TPP: US geopolitical pressure once Japan entered negotiations, and the de facto FTA negotiations with Japan under the TPP. Dealing with Japan is an especially tall order given the troubled history of South Korea-Japan economic and political relations.