http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Scott G. Isaksen,Wouter S. Aerts 대한사고개발학회 2011 The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Vol.21 No.2
People, organizations, and societies benefit when there is an appropriate fit between individuals and their environments (e.g. Chatman, 1989; Kristof, 1996; Shalley, Zhou & Oldham, 2004). This is particularly true for producing organizational innovation. Little is known about the relationship between style preferences (as the people aspect) and climates for creativity. This study aims to tie these two constructs together by taking an interactionist approach. Two assessment approaches were taken. Best and worst-case climates were assessed by administering two short forms of the Situational Outlook Questionnaire in which 213 individuals identified specific best and worst-case work experiences and then responded to the nine dimensions of creative climate. Problem-solving style was measured by VIEW: An Assessment of Problem Solving Style. The findings of this research confirmed that significant differences between best (most desired/ most likely to fit) and worst (least desired/a most likely misfit) workplace climates exist. It also suggests that problem-solving styles make a difference for some of the dimensions of creative climate. A number of implications were presented for those who lead and manage for innovation.
Scott G. Isaksen,David Geuens 대한사고개발학회 2007 The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Vol.17 No.1
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between VIEW: An Assessment of Problem Solving Style (VIEW; Selby, Treffinger, Isaksen & Lauer, 2004; Treffinger & Selby, 2004), and the preference for learning and using of the specific tools, guidelines, stages and components of the current version of creative problem solving (Isaksen & Treffinger, 2004; Treffinger, Isaksen, & Stead-Dorval, 2006). This study, conducted by Geuens (2006), can be considered a part of a larger program of research called the Cognitive Styles Project, so the previous work done within the program will be summarized to provide an understanding of the broader context for the research. Significant relationships between all three dimensions of VIEW and various creative problem solving (CPS) tools, guidelines and process stages were found. Findings on the Orientation to Change dimension from VIEW were similar to previous findings using the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory (KAI). New insights for the Manner of Processing dimension of VIEW showing, for example, that internals do favor learning Brainwriting. New insights were also found for the Ways of Deciding dimension of VIEW, showing that Task-Oriented deciders reported many more significant relationships for both learning and applying CPS. In general, even though this was a very exploratory study, there was support for the use of VIEW in improving our understanding of style differences for learning and applying CPS.