http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 주제어 : unauthorized interference (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
매크로 프로그램을 사용하여 티켓 등 이용권을 예매하는 행위의 가벌성 검토
최란 ( Choi Ran ) 한남대학교 과학기술법연구원 2018 과학기술법연구 Vol.24 No.3
현재 공연 등 입장권의 예매의 대부분은 온라인 상의 티켓 등 이용권 예매 시스템을 통해 이루어지고 있다. 이러한 이용권 예매 시스템은 해당 시스템 제공자가 미리 예정해 놓은 예매 절차의 각 단계를 빨리 입력한 순으로 이용권 예매가 가능하도록 설정되어 있는데, 이에 예매 절차의 각 단계를 미리 설정한 하나의 키 입력 또는 마우스 클릭으로 대체할 수 있는 매크로 프로그램을 사용하여 이용권을 예매하는 방식으로 티켓을 다량으로 선점하는 행위가 발생, 반복되고 있다. 더욱이 이렇게 얻어진 이용권이 고가로 재판매 되거나 사기 등의 재산범죄와 결부되는 등 다양한 사회문제들을 야기하기에 이르자 이러한 행위에 대한 제재의 필요성 및 그 방법에 대한 논의 또한 활발하게 이루어지고 있다. 본 연구는 재판매 등의 행위 이전에 존재하는 매크로 프로그램을 사용하여 온라인에서 티켓 등 이용권을 예매하는 행위를 중심으로 해당행위의 가벌성을 검토해 보고자 한다. 먼저 매크로 프로그램을 사용하여 이용권을 예매하는 행위에 정보통신망법상 침해죄와 형법상 업무방해죄의 적용이 가능한지를 검토한다. 다음으로 매크로 프로그램의 부정한 사용과 관련해 입법적 해결책으로서 제시된 여러 의원안을 살피고, 각 의원안의 문제점을 검토한 후, 이를 바탕으로 매크로 프로그램의 부정한 사용과 관련하여 입법의 필요성이 논의되어야 할 지점에 대해 고민해 보고자 한다. The use of a macro-program is not illegal. However, the use of a macro-program in the online ticket booking system should be discusses its illegality. This paper examines the illegality of the using macro-program in online ticket booking system in advance of resale. The purposes of this study were: (1) to examine whether the current law can be applied to the act. The first part of this paper discusses whether or not paragraph 1 or 3 of article 48 'Act On Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization And Information Protection, Etc.' can be applied. It is also reviewed the applicability to the Criminal Law Regulations, Article 314(Interference with Business); (2) to review legislation presented as a solution in relation to the unauthorized use of the macro program and to examine each issue of measures; Based on these discussions, it can be seen that the current legislation on the use of macro-program that are not allowed by the online ticketing system is concerned with duplication of sanctions. Therefore, if it know that the use of a macro program is not allowed, but use them on purpose, then such acts would be an infringement of a quare deal or fair access. In this case, legislation could be considered as a solution.
-
Criminal and Legal Countermeasures against Cybercrime in the Conditions of Martial Law
Nataliia, Veselovska,Serhii, Krushynskyi,Oleh, Kravchuk,Olеksandr, Punda,Ivan, Piskun International Journal of Computer ScienceNetwork S 2022 International journal of computer science and netw Vol.22 No.12
The article is devoted to the consideration of the features of the application of criminal and legal countermeasures against cybercrime in the conditions of martial law. While conducting this research, we found an opportunity to formulate the author's recommendations for solving the most complex law enforcement problems, as well as to propose changes to the Criminal Code of Ukraine aimed at eliminating the flaws of the analyzed Law, the adoption of which will contribute to the achievement of higher efficiency of the relevant criminal law prescriptions. It is argued that the removal of the previously existing in the footnote of Art. 361 of the Criminal Code of a fundamentally important caveat regarding the fact that when assessing "significant damage", the mentioned property equivalent was to be taken into account only when such damage consisted in causing material damage, which led to a significant and unjustified narrowing of the scope of potential application of Part 4 of Article 361 of the Criminal Code.
-
이정훈(Jung Hoon Lee) 중앙법학회 2011 中央法學 Vol.13 No.2
Recently, the Supreme Court decided that a person who had sold his account of Online Game to others is not guilty when he changed the password of that account because he has an entire right to access that account and the buyer has not legal rights from the online game service provider`s view. Online game service providers prohibit the account trade at their End User License Agreements(EULA) and Terms of Service(TOS). But even if the buyer access that account with seller`s ID and password from trading account of online game, the access itself is not the infringement of the article 48 ① of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utiliztion and Information Protection, ETC(Any person shall be prohibited from infiltrating into information and communications network without any justifiable access right or beyond his permitted access right.) Though accounts trading is prohibited from EULA of online game, the effect of EULA is valid to game user and service provider. The trading is a valid contract to the party concerned and the right to access is moved to the buyer entirely. Furthermore, the ``information of others`` in the article 49 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utiliztion and Information Protection, ETC is to be interpreted from the legality to access to the information not to the network of information service. Thus if the person who made account first in online game changed this password after handing over his account, he violates his contract because he blocked the buyer`s use of account including change of password, playing games, etc. So, I think his behavior changing password after moving his account to buyer comes under article 49 of the the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utiliztion and Information Protection, ETC.
KCI
KISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
