http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 주제어 : 국세기본법 제39조(Article 39 of Framework Act On National Taxes) (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
국세기본법 제39조 제1항 제2호 가 목의 과점주주의 범위에 관한 연구 - 대법원 2008.1.10. 선고 2006두19105 판결 평석
이전오(Lee Jeon-Oh) 성균관대학교 법학연구소 2008 성균관법학 Vol.20 No.2
The Supreme Court"s 2006du19105, decided January 10, 2008 held that:<BR> "Considering the legislative purpose and the amendment history of Article 39 of Framework Act On National Taxes, it is reasonable to interpret that the purpose of the proviso of Paragraph 1 and the provision of Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 2, Item ga is to indicate that among the oligopolistic stockholders stated in Article 39, Paragraph 2, those who hold 51% or more of the outstanding shares issued and exercises actual rights to those shares bear the secondary tax liability only to the extent of their ownership shares, but does not require an oligopolistic stockholder to actually exercise his rights to the shares of 51% or more by only himself."<BR> However, for the reasons that follow, I don"t agree with the conclusion of the Supreme Court"s decision above.<BR> First of all, though there are various ways to interpret the law, the most fundamental and important one is the way of contextual interpretation. However, the above decision goes against the way of interpretation based on context.<BR> Secondly, considering how the legislative purpose of secondary tax liability originated from fear that the shareholders who hold shares exceeding 50% may abuse the corporate entity, the court decision above is not royal to the legislator"s intent.<BR> Thirdly, the Supreme Court"s decision above is against the holding of the Constitutional Court"s 97 hun-ga 13, decided May 28, 1998 and circumstances of how Article 39 of Framework Act On National Taxes was revised afterwards.<BR> Lastly, should the purpose of Article 39, Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 2, Item ga of Framework Act On National Taxes be interpreted as the Supreme Court ruled, - a means to make all the stockholders in the category of oligopolistic stockholders bear the secondary tax liability but not just a particular stockholder who holds shares exceeding 50% - there is no particular need to separately enact Article 39, Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 2, Item ga of Framework Act On National Taxes.<BR> In conclusion, Article 39, Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 2, Item ga of Framework Act On National Taxes should be interpreted as a means to make bear the secondary tax liability to an individual stockholder who owns shares exceeding 50% by only himself, but not every stockholder who just belong to the category of oligopolistic stockholders of Article 39, Paragraph 2.
KCI
스콜라연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
