Micronutrients as Supportive Care for Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients; Benefits and Concerns

Yoo-Sun Kim,Yuri Kim Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer 2013 Journal of digestive cancer reports Vol.1 No.2

Cancer is the first leading cause of death in Korea and the second leading cause of death in the USA. There is extensive research into prevention of cancer and the support of oncology patients with diet or dietary supplements. In vitro and in vivo animal studies have indicated that antioxidants, including beta-carotene, alpha-tocopherol, and ascorbic acid, can yield anti-cancer effects in addition to providing protection against oxidative damage. Although many observational studies have shown that consuming fruits and vegetables can reduce the risk of some cancers, the results of several large-scale human intervention trials testing the benefits of a single or combined higher-dose of individual micronutrients have been inconsistent. Cancer can cause profound metabolic and physiological changes which may affect patients' nutrient requirements. Although the optimal route of nutrient delivery is through diet, cancer patients often suffer symptoms that disrupt their food intake, including anorexia, premature satiety, altered taste and smell, and changes in bowel mobility. In particular, micronutrient deficits can slow postoperative healing, contribute to depression symptoms, and decrease immune competence. Cancer patients are generally motivated to take dietary supplements to improve responses to treatment and quality of life. The Physician's Health Study II (PHS II) randomized controlled trial reported recently that daily multivitamin supplementation significantly, albeit modestly, reduced the risk of total cancer. Although evidence of multivitamin use benefits is limited in cancer patients, taking dietary supplements with constituents in the range of the recommended daily allowance according to the Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) recommendation is generally considered to be safe.

Importance of Early Diagnosis and Screening, Lessons from Gastric Cancer and Colorectal Cancer

Seun Ja Park Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer 2014 Journal of digestive cancer reports Vol.2 No.1

Screening and early diagnosis of cancer is important. Screening lead to detect disease earlier, and earlier treatment of disease cause to yield a better outcome than treatment at the onset of symptoms. Some studies suggest that gastric cancer screening may be associated with a reduced risk of mortality from gastric cancer, although there are no definitive data from large controlled trials. Regular colorectal cancer screening or testing is one of the most powerful weapons for preventing colorectal cancer, because some polyps, or growths can be found and removed before they have the chance to turn into cancer. Screening can also result in finding colorectal cancer early, when it is highly curable. In conclusion, to increase utilization of screening is important to decrease gastric and colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality.

Role of Innate Immunity in Colorectal Cancer

Bora Keum Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer 2018 Journal of digestive cancer reports Vol.6 No.1

Chemotherapy and surgical resection are the mainstay of cancer treatment. Particularly for chemotherapy, although it is effective method to care, sometimes cure various cancers, there are many different status of cancer not being controlled by chemotherapy such as recurrence and resistance to chemotherapy. In order to overcome those difficulties during cancer therapy, immunotherapy targeting immune cells and immune associated factors to enhance cancer immunity has been highlighted. Innate immunity plays important roles on initial stage of cancer immunity that are detecting, killing cancer cells and initiating adaptive immunity for cancer. So many basic and clinical studies to manage innate immunity for cancer therapy have been going on, and most of them were to stimulate innate immune cells including dendritic cell, macrophage, monocyte, and natural killer cell in various ways. They showed promising results but still there are many things to be resolved before clinical application. Herein, I review the role of innate immune cells and therapeutic trials for colorectal cancer.

STAT3 and SHP-1: Toward Effective Management of Gastric Cancer

Moon Kyung Joo Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer 2018 Journal of digestive cancer reports Vol.6 No.1

The importance of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signaling in gastric carcinogenesis was firmly evaluated in the previous studies. Fully activated STAT3 induces various target genes involving tumor invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and mediates interaction between cancer cells and microenvironmental immune cells. Thus, suppression of STAT3 activity is an important issue for inhibition of gastric carcinogenesis and invasion. Unfortunately, data from clinical studies of direct inhibitor targeting STAT3 have been disappointing. SH2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 1 (SHP-1) effectively dephosphorylates and inhibits STAT3 activity, which has not been extensively studied gastric cancer research field. However, by summarizing recent data, it is evident that protein and gene expression of SHP-1 are minimal in gastric cancer cells, and induction of SHP-1 effectively downregulates phosphorylated STAT3 and inhibits cellular invasion in gastric cancer cells. Several SHP-1 inducers have been investigated in the experimental studies, including proton pump inhibitor, arsenic trioxide, and other natural compounds. Taken together, we suggest that modulation of SHP-1/STAT3 signaling axis may present a new way for treatment of gastric cancer, and development of effective SHP-1 inducer may be an important task in the future search field of gastric cancer.

Current Status of Targeted Therapies in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Hyun Seok Lee Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer 2014 Journal of digestive cancer reports Vol.2 No.2

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has continuously increased and CRC is a major cause of cancer-related death. Systemic chemotherapy has resulted in a significant improvement in overall survival in metastatic CRC. The development of biologic agents for the treatment of CRC has additionally expanded the options for the treatment. Cetuximab is useful in KRAS wild type tumors in combination with chemotherapy for metastatic disease in both the first and second line settings. It is also used as monotherapy after failure of both irinotecan and oxaliplatin containing regimens. Panitumumab has similar indications, and is primarily used in patients intolerant to cetuximab due to hypersensitivity reactions. Bevacizumab is primarily used as first line and second line therapy in metastatic CRC. However, the optimal way and duration to combine these chemotherapeutic agents are not yet established.

Quality of Life Findings of Adjuvant FOLFOX4 vs. XELOX in Stage III Colon Cancer Patients

Moo In Park,Youn Jung Choi,Seun Ja Park,Won Moon,Sung Eun Kim,Jae Hyun Kim,Byung Kwon Ahn,Sung Uhn Baek,Seung Hyun Lee,Seung Hun Lee Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer 2017 Journal of digestive cancer reports Vol.5 No.2

Background: To compare the quality of life (QoL), the convenience of chemotherapy and satisfaction between colon cancer patients treated with FOLFOX4 and XELOX. Methods: The study was conducted in 26 patients with stage III colon cancer. Patients were received FOLFOX4 (n=17) or XELOX (n=9). QoL, convenience, and satisfaction were assessed using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (QLQ-C30), Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral neuropathy (QLQ-CIPN) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Chemotherapy Convenience and Satisfaction Questionnaire (FACIT-CCSQ), respectively. Patients completed questionnaires at baseline, at cycle 4 (C4) and cycle 8 (C8) (FOLFOX4) or at cycle 3 (C3) and cycle 6 (C6) visits (XELOX) and at their final visit. Results: In the QLQ-C30, at the final visit, XELOX patients had better functional scores than FOLFOX4 patients (physical: 85.7 vs.60.4, p=0.03; role: 83.3 vs. 57.5, p=0.04) as well as better symptom scores (constipation: 9.5 vs. 40.4, p=0.01). In CIPN, at the C6/C8 visit, XELOX patients had lower motor scale scores than FOLFOX4 patients (3.8 vs. 21.6, p=0.02). Moreover, at the C6/C8 visit, XELOX was more convenient than FOLFOX4 in FACIT-CCSQ (79.7 vs. 55.5, p=0.04). Male patients were especially likely to consider XELOX to be more convenient (90.0 vs. 55.0, p=0.01) and satisfactory (55.4 vs. 26.2, p=0.03) and fewer concern (91.0 vs. 65.0, p=0.03) than FOLFOX4. XELOX patients spent fewer days on hospital visits at C3/C4, C6/C8 and final visit (2.8 vs. 4.2, p=0.01; 2.7 vs. 4.1, p=0.01; 3.0 vs. 4.5, p=0.01). Conclusion: XELOX may be a better adjuvant chemotherapy choice for patients with colon cancer than FOLFOX4 in terms of QoL, convenience, and satisfaction.

Cancer Cachexia in Pancreatic Cancer Patients: Recent Advances and New Therapeutic Approach

Sang Hoon Lee,Moon Jae Chung Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer 2015 Journal of digestive cancer reports Vol.3 No.2

About 80% of all pancreatic cancer patients suffer from a wasting syndrome defined as the cancer cachexia characterized by abnormally low weight, weakness, and loss of skeletal muscle mass, which directly impacts physical activity, quality of life and overall survival. Over the past decades, we have gained new insights into the underlying mechanism of cachexia associated with pancreatic cancer. The aim of this review was to explore recent findings about cancer cachexia pathophysiology and describe the current pharmacologic approach. Pancreatic cancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome mediated by mechanical factors, inflammatory cytokines, neuropeptides, hormones and tumor-derived factors. The treatment of cancer cachexia remains controversial but is currently an active area of research. Several new targeted drugs are under investigation, and we hope to open a new prospect in the management of cancer cachexia in the future.

Mesenteric Approach in Pancreatoduodenectomy

Akimasa Nakao Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer 2016 Journal of digestive cancer reports Vol.4 No.2

The 26^th World Congress of the International Association of Surgeons, Gastroenterologists and Oncologists (IASGO) was held in Seoul, Korea from September 8 to 10, 2016. In this congress, I gave a State-of-the-Art Lecture II entitled "Mesenteric Approach in Pancreatoduodenectomy." The ideal surgery for pancreatic head cancer is isolated pancreatoduodenectomy, which involves en bloc resection using a non-touch isolation technique. My team has been developing isolated pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer since 1981, when we developed an antithrombogenic bypass catheter for the portal vein. In this operation, the first and most important step is the use of a mesenteric approach instead of Kocher's maneuver. The mesenteric approach allows dissection from the non-cancer infiltrating side and determination of cancer-free margins and resectability, followed by systematic lymphadenectomy around the superior mesenteric artery. This approach enables early ligation of the inferior pancreatoduodenal artery and total mesopancreas excision. It is the ideal surgery for pancreatic head cancer from both oncological and surgical viewpoints. The precise surgical techniques of the mesenteric approach are herein described.

Best Treatments in Borderline Resectable Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Joon Seong Park Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer 2016 Journal of digestive cancer reports Vol.4 No.2

Pancreatic cancer is the lethal disease and the prognosis of pancreatic cancer has remained largely unchanged over the past years. Borderline advanced pancreatic cancer is a biological different from resectable pancreatic cancer due to higher risk of early recurrence because of artery/vein abutment. Therefore this unique subset of pancreatic cancer has a controversial issue with regard to their treatment policy. Some institutes managed borderline advanced pancreatic cancer by up-front neoadhuvant chemotherapy because neoadjuvant chemotherapy provide the opportunity to treat early micro-metastasis with unfavorable tumor biology. But, some institutes try aggressive up-front surgical procedures to provide a chance of long-term survival in highly selected patients. Therefore this unique subset of pancreatic cancer has a controversial issue with regard to their treatment policy. This review address recent treatment trend for patients with borderline advanced pancreatic cancer.

Nutritional Assessment and Nutritional Management for GI Cancer Patients

Mi Hyang Um,Yoo Kyoung Park Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer 2014 Journal of digestive cancer reports Vol.2 No.1

Cancer, especially GI cancer itself and any associated treatments have profound effect on the patient's nutritional status. It is therefore very important to understand various nutritional issues in GI cancer patients for the cure and for increasing the compliance during the course of the treatment. Screening and identification of nutritional risk for the GI cancer patients is very essential and is plays a critical part of the treatment to help improve patient outcomes. Maintaining optimal nutritional status is an important goal in the management of individuals diagnosed, treated with cancer. Maintenance of adequate nutritional intake is important whether patients are undergoing active therapy, recovering from cancer therapy, or are in remission and striving to avoid cancer recurrence. The goals of nutrition therapy are to prevent or reverse nutrient deficiencies, preserve lean body mass, help patients better tolerate treatments and minimize nutrition-related side effects and complications, etc. Recent interest in clinical settings is also in maximizing quality of life of the patients which can also be modulated by appropriate nutrition.