RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Partisan Conflict and American Public Opinion Towards East Asia

        Yaeli Bloch Elkon(옐리 블-엘컨),Robert Y. Shapiro(로버트 샤피로) 고려대학교 아세아문제연구소 2009 亞細亞硏究 Vol.52 No.1

        Since the 1970s American politics has become increasingly polarized along partisan and ideological lines. Until recently, this polarization has been widely debated mainly in the area of domestic economic and social policymaking. Shapiro and Bloch-Elkon (2007), found that partisan and ostensibly ideological conflict have been a visible characteristic of foreign policy debates as well, suggesting a major change in the nature of American politics. This paper examines surveys conducted from the 1990’s until the present by different organizations, to see the extent to which, if any, the American public’s as well as leaders’ opinions on U.S foreign policy issues towards East Asian countries (South Korea, North Korea, China and Japan), have also become more polarized along Democratic-Republican partisan and ideological lines. It finds that for the most part the opinions toward East Asian countries have not been heavily embroiled in the ongoing partisan conflict. North Korea, from 2004 onward because of its growing nuclear capability, has been seen as a threat by all segments of the American public. This development and the otherwise low salience of U.S.-East Asian relations compared to other areas of American foreign policy, affected how the public thought about this region in partisan and ideological terms.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼