RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Accuracy and precision of consumer-grade GPS positioning in an urban green space environment

        Ehsan Abdi,Hamid Soofi Mariv,Azade Deljouei,Hormoz Sohrabi 한국산림과학회 2014 Forest Science And Technology Vol.10 No.3

        The use of global positioning systems (GPS) has increased in recent years, including for urban forestry management, as aresult of its wide range of applications, ease of use and direct use of GPS data in geographic information systems. Thisstudy was conducted in an urban green space to assess the accuracy and precision of two consumer-grade GPS receiverswith regard to ground control point (GCP) coordinates. Eleven fixed GCPs with known positions were selected and theirdata collected on four days (two seasons) and three different daytime periods (08:00, 11:00 and 14:00) each day. For eachtreatment (season and daytime) five replications were recorded. The results showed that the best mean position accuracieswere provided by the Colorado receiver in leaf-off period (4–5 m), and its corresponding position accuracies for summerranged from 9 to 12 m. The results of the Rino receiver mean position error in summer (19–36 m) and winter (10–26 m)were higher than reported in literature. Point averaging had a positive effect on accuracy in both receivers for winter. Insummer, three-point averaging was more efficient than five-point averaging. During the day, the Colorado receiver had thebest positional accuracy at 08:00 in winter, but in summer there was a large variation in the results. For the Rino receiverthere was no general trend; however, results taken at 11:00 and 14:00 were better than those at 08:00. Regarding precision,point averaging had a positive effect on the Colorado while the Rino precision indicated the contrary. The Coloradoreceiver had better precision than the Rino in both seasons, and was the best in summer. The Rino receiver had better precisionin summer compared to winter, and in both recievers daytime had no significant effect on precision. The measuredaccuracies of Colorado are acceptable for many environment and urban forestry measurement applications and satisfy mappingrequirements, but the Rino receiver showed poorer results.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼