RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        국방 핵심기술은 군사전략에 영향을 미치는가? - 전쟁 전 ARM-AZE 국방 핵심기술 역량 증감을 중심으로 -

        임철균 ( Lim Cheulkyun ) 한국국가전략연구원 2022 한국국가전략 Vol.7 No.3

        The argument of this study is that defense core technology (hereafter DCT, Defense Core Technology) and military strategy mutually influence each other and influence the establishment of an offensive strategy and a defensive strategy, respectively. Numerous examples of history from ancient times to modern times prove this. Although it is difficult to classify DCT itself as a technology for attack or a technology for defense, this study pays attention to the fact that securing a specific means enhances the advantage of attack or defense and is involved in military strategy establishment. However, with the exception of the attack-defense theory, the war theory has been silent about the effect of DCT on strategy, whether intentionally or unintentionally. In this study, as dependent variables, information surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR, Information Surveillance Reconnaissance), precision guided weapons (PGM, Precision Guided Munition), missile defense (hereinafter referred to as DCT), MD, Missile Defense) was applied to the effect of these three key defense technologies on military strategy by analyzing the quantitative increase and decrease status of the two countries in the seven years before the start of the 2020 War in Armenia and Azerbaijan, proving the claim of this study. Through this, it was intended to contribute to broadening the base of military strategy by examining the relationship between strategy and means.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼