RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        영어 1교과서와 대학수학능력시험 영어 영역에 나타난 부정사의 분포에 대한 분석

        이지현 ( Ji-hyun Lee ),이현우(교신저자) ( Hyun Oo Lee ) 한국중등영어교육학회 2016 중등영어교육 Vol.9 No.2

        This paper investigates how infinitive clauses and their uses are distributed among four high school English Ⅰ textbooks and the 2015-2016 College Scholastic Ability Test (CSAT) English reading sections. Five major uses of infinitives are identified: the external argument use, the internal argument one, the adjectival one, the adverbial one, and the idiomatic one. Comparison of the data annotated with these five major uses through a chi-square tests shows that there is a statistically significant difference between these six materials. The internal argument use of infinitives is further classified as the noun complement use, the verb complement one, the adjective complement one, and the preposition complement one. A chi-square test shows that, in relation to the four sub-internal argument uses, there is also a statistically significant difference between the English I textbooks and the CSATs. Although further chi-square tests show no significant distributional difference between the English I textbooks and the CSATs regarding various adverbial uses, they do show that they are significantly different regarding the complement patterns of verbs involving infinitives. The findings obtained here suggest that the presentation of infinitives in the English I textbooks is not enough to teach infinitives through input enhancement together with input flood.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼