http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 신재준(Shin Jaejoon) (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
신재준(Shin Jaejoon) 역사비평사 2016 역사비평 Vol.- No.115
This paper reviews Korea-US relations concerning the suspension of trade with Japan by Rhee’s Government in 1959. In 1959, Korea-Japan relations were the worst since the beginning of negotiationsto establishnational friendship in 1951. The reason was the Japanese Government’s permission for the repatriation of Koreans in Japan to North Korea. Rhee’s Government suspended trade with Japan to stop the repatriation process. Although this was a problem between Korea and Japan, the USA played an important role in the matter. A large part of trade with Japan was through the USA aid fund of the International Cooperation Administration(ICA). Korea requested a waiver of ICA Regulation1 which stipulated the“procure’ rule” as the lowest price possible in order to stop imports from Japan. The USA rejected this request as an inappropriate use of aid funds and because they thought that any decision by them on the matter would be regarded as favoring one country over the other. Relations between Korea-USA-Japan were complexly entwined through the structure of ICA aid. The trade conict between Korea and Japan in 1959 was not the problem of two nations but of three; theUSA maintained ‘neutrality’. Unfortunately, Korea interpreted this neutrality as support for Japan or their ‘acquiescence’ for the repatriation of Koreans from Japan. is was the ‘parallax’ of Korea-USA relations caused by ICA aid and it provides a ‘vision’ for understanding Korea-USA-Japan relations.
-
신재준(Shin, JaeJoon) 역사학회 2018 역사학보 Vol.0 No.238
This article examines the emergence of Korea-Japan(K-J) economic cooperation(EC) negotiations prior to the normalization of diplomatic relations(NDR), the K government’s policy on this issue, and the two governments’ discussions after the agreement of Kim and Ohira. As K-J EC became a hot topic, there was a growing concern in the Korean society. The K government has claimed that EC should be promoted after the NDR. However, because of the huge amount of money needed to carry out the economic development plan, it began to examine the possibility of EC early onwards. Since 1963, EC was discussed at the level of both governments. Initially, transactions of capital goods on a deferred payment basis were discussed, and emergency aid was discussed after mid-1964. The process was distinct from the one-on-one talks, but in reality, the two sides seemed to be interconnected and sluggish. However, the real economic relations have been made through this process in a situation where the execution of PC is delayed. In short, the process of discussing EC during this period was the starting point of the K-J economic relationship, which began in earnest after the NDR.
-
1960년대 중반~1970년대 초, 서울 소재 일본인 유골 송환
신재준(Shin, Jaejoon) 역사비평사 2021 역사비평 Vol.- No.137
This paper examined the Korea-Japan negotiations on the issue of Japanese Ashes in Seoul(Korea), domestic public opinion, and its historical meanings. Previous studies have focused on the fact that this issue is closely related to the issue of Korean remains(ashes) in Korea-Japan relations. While accepting these achievements, this paper tried to move on to a more advanced discussion at the following two points. First, by actively utilizing government documents, this paper tried to examine the excavation of the remains of Dongguk University and Hongje-dong, and the process of negotiations with Japan more delicately. Second, Paying attention to this issue, especially the accident on damage to the memorial tower in the charnel house, this paper tried to reveal what kind of reaction it caused and what it meant. e issue of Japanese Ashes at this time was a measure of Korean society’s feelings toward Japan. It was also a barometer to examine how “normalized” relations between Korea and Japan.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
