RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • 한국과 미국 실내디자이너의 업무, 계약서와 보수기준 비교

        신경주;윤소연;캔디 카멜길프렌 한양대학교 2006 韓國 生活 科學 硏究 Vol.26 No.2

        This study examined the differences between South Korea and the United States of America’s interior designer's contract duty, standard documents, and reward. The research methodology analyzed many documents including AIA, ASID, and KOSID professional standards. The research process was as follows: First, find out the evolution of the two countries interior design professions and how each acknowledged contract documents. Second, identify the document guidelines established by professional organizations to determine suitable materials. Third, compare the two countries contract duty, standard documents, and reward. The results are as follow: Duty of Interior Designer: Little difference was found between South Korea and US interior design duties. Owner and Designer Contract Documents: In South Korea KOSID published contract documents in 1982 with first general revisions occurring in 1997. Designers work by using a variety of contracts including verbal, personal, office, and KOSID. In the United States the cooperation of National Association of Builder first published documents in 1888 with revisions occurring from 1911-1987. Today over 100 contract documents are published by the AIA and 7 residence documents are published by ASID. Reward of Interior Designer: In South Korea the table of duty rewards sets the base price with owner and designer making the final decision. Different rates are set according to total construction price and type of building. The highest billable rate comes from a museum, while an education facility has a lower rate; rates range between 5.0-25.5. In the United States firms use different strategies dependent upon project constraints and demand. Choices include fixed fee, hourly rate, percentage of cost, area fee, and retail method.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼