RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        인간존엄의 비교법적 고찰과 그 시사점

        강승식 ( Seung Sik Kang ) 홍익대학교 법학연구소 2013 홍익법학 Vol.14 No.1

        Human dignity is the central value of many national constitutions and international human rights treaties. Human dignity is an important means of solving constitutional problems, such as abortion, drugs, assisted suicide and the death penalty. But the conventional understanding of human dignity has a limit for dealing with these problems. Human dignity functions as a constitutional principle. Therefore it becomes a normative foundation of all basic rights, including fundamental rights that are not enumerated in the constitution. Also it gives a guide in interpretation of constitution and statutes. Besides, it means the fundamental value of human beings and guarantees private autonomy, public autonomy and minimum provision. For people suffering extreme poverty, the guarantee of autonomy is inadequate to lead life on the bases. But at the same time, it supports community value, such as social values and states interests. However, if we like to place community value above fundamental value or autonomy, human dignity can be wrongfully used for excessive restrictions on basic rights. This goes against the aim of human dignity. Therefore, when the government limit their people`s rights and freedoms in order to realize community value, it must consider the potential harm to oneself and to others and the degree of social consensus about it.

      • KCI등재

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼