RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      集合動産의 讓渡擔保에 關한 硏究 = (A) study on the transfer security of collective movable estate

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9951052

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper is studied on transfer security. this transfer security are classified two types. The one is general transfer security and the other is transfer security of movable estate.
      In these days, there has been limited in security for bond by real and movable estate. So we must seek to new type of security. Because lack of fund obstruct an individual or enterprise's economic activities. This paper introduced transfer security of collective movable estate which is one of the new methods in security.
      But transfer security of collective movable estate have some problems. because an object thing of security is aggregative thing.
      In this paper, the following problems were treated.
      1. Whether or not recognize concept of collective movable estate. Today, a position which recognize this concept is strong in japan and korea. But this study didn't recognize above concept.
      2. An organization of legal theory.
      There two type of theory that is called theory of collection and analysis. This paper followed the latter. Because this paper denied a notion of collective movable estate. These organization is more logical constitution.
      3. A specify of objective thing in security.
      In problem of specify, there are three types which is a kind, quantitative sphere, and place.
      4. The method of public announcement.
      There are two types. The one theory is a reform of possession the other is method of indication. This paper followed the latter.
      This paper is consisted of above problems. But except these problems, there are many unsolved subjects. This type of transfer security is theory that is forming these days.
      So in the future, deep research and study must performed in these problems.
      this paper didn't recognize the concept of collective movable estate, because these problems are solved enough by theory which based on traditional civil law system.
      In conclusion, the author hope through the deep study unclear problems are elucidated.
      번역하기

      This paper is studied on transfer security. this transfer security are classified two types. The one is general transfer security and the other is transfer security of movable estate. In these days, there has been limited in security for bond by real...

      This paper is studied on transfer security. this transfer security are classified two types. The one is general transfer security and the other is transfer security of movable estate.
      In these days, there has been limited in security for bond by real and movable estate. So we must seek to new type of security. Because lack of fund obstruct an individual or enterprise's economic activities. This paper introduced transfer security of collective movable estate which is one of the new methods in security.
      But transfer security of collective movable estate have some problems. because an object thing of security is aggregative thing.
      In this paper, the following problems were treated.
      1. Whether or not recognize concept of collective movable estate. Today, a position which recognize this concept is strong in japan and korea. But this study didn't recognize above concept.
      2. An organization of legal theory.
      There two type of theory that is called theory of collection and analysis. This paper followed the latter. Because this paper denied a notion of collective movable estate. These organization is more logical constitution.
      3. A specify of objective thing in security.
      In problem of specify, there are three types which is a kind, quantitative sphere, and place.
      4. The method of public announcement.
      There are two types. The one theory is a reform of possession the other is method of indication. This paper followed the latter.
      This paper is consisted of above problems. But except these problems, there are many unsolved subjects. This type of transfer security is theory that is forming these days.
      So in the future, deep research and study must performed in these problems.
      this paper didn't recognize the concept of collective movable estate, because these problems are solved enough by theory which based on traditional civil law system.
      In conclusion, the author hope through the deep study unclear problems are elucidated.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 目次 = ⅰ
      • 第1章 序論 = 1
      • 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1
      • 第2節 硏究의 方法 및 論文의 構成 = 4
      • 第2章 讓渡擔保의 發展와 法的規律 = 6
      • 目次 = ⅰ
      • 第1章 序論 = 1
      • 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1
      • 第2節 硏究의 方法 및 論文의 構成 = 4
      • 第2章 讓渡擔保의 發展와 法的規律 = 6
      • 第1節 讓渡擔保의 成立背景과 發展經過 = 6
      • 第2節 讓渡擔保 一般論 = 7
      • 1. 意義와 機龍 = 7
      • 1) 意義 = 7
      • 2) 社會的 機能 = 8
      • 2. 讓渡擔保의 有效性 = 10
      • 1) 虛僞表示와의 關係 = 11
      • 2) 脫法行爲와의 關係 = 11
      • 3) 物權法定主義와의 關係 = 12
      • 4) 信託法 제29조와의 關係 = 12
      • 5) 暴利行爲와의 關係 = 12
      • 3. 法的 構成 = 13
      • 1) 學說의 槪觀 = 14
      • 2) 假登記擔保 등에 관한 法律의 意味 = 16
      • 3) 檢討 = 17
      • 第3章 集合動産讓渡擔保의 特佐과 內容 = 19
      • 第1節 意義 및 特性 = 19
      • 1. 意義 = 19
      • 2. 特性 = 20
      • 第2部 沿革 및 問題點 = 21
      • 1. 沿革 = 21
      • 2. 問題點 = 22
      • 第3節 類型 = 24
      • 1. 確定集合動産의 讓渡擔保 = 25
      • 2. 流動集合動産의 讓渡擔保 = 25
      • 3. 變質集合動産의 讓渡擔保 = 26
      • 4. 檢討 = 26
      • 第4節 集合動産의 讓渡擔保에 對한 法理橫成 = 27
      • 1. 槪要 = 27
      • 2. 集合物漑念의 問題 = 28
      • 1) 獨逸 = 28
      • 2) 日本 = 33
      • 3) 韓國 = 35
      • 4) 檢討 = 36
      • 3. 集合動産의 讓渡擔保의 法理構成 = 37
      • 1) 否定說 = 38
      • 2) 集合物論 = 40
      • 3) 分析論 = 42
      • 4) 價置範圍論 = 43
      • 4. 檢討 = 45
      • 第4章 集合動産讓渡擔保의 設定과 實現 = 49
      • 第1節 設定契約 = 49
      • 1. 類型 = 49
      • 1) 賣却 許可制型 = 50
      • 2) 賣却權 規定型 = 50
      • 3) 賣却代金 預置型 = 50
      • 4) 委託加工ㆍ販賣型 = 50
      • 5) 保管倉庫 提供型 = 51
      • 6) 輸入擔保荷物 保管型 = 51
      • 2. 問題點 = 51
      • 第2篩 目的物의 特定 및 公示方法 = 53
      • 1. 目的物의 特定 = 53
      • 1) 特定의 必要性 = 53
      • 2) 特定의 一般的 基準 = 54
      • 3) 特定의 基準時點 = 60
      • 2. 目的物의 公示方法 = 63
      • 1) 槪要 = 63
      • 2) 學說 = 63
      • 3) 判例의 態度 = 68
      • 4) 檢討 = 68
      • 第3節 目的物의 管理ㆍ處分 및 補充의 問題 = 70
      • 1. 目的物의 管理 = 70
      • 2. 目的物의 處分 및 補充 = 71
      • 第4節 擔保權의 實行 = 73
      • 1. 實行節次 = 73
      • 2. 問題點 = 74
      • 3. 詐害行爲取消 및 否認의 問題 = 74
      • 第5節 國內 判側의 檢訓와 分析 = 75
      • 1. 犬判 88.10.25, 85 누 941. 「일신제강 사건1」 = 76
      • 1) 事實關係 = 76
      • 2) 判決要旨 = 76
      • 3) 檢討 = 77
      • 2. 大判 88.12,27, 87 누 1043. 「일신제강 사건2」 = 80
      • 1) 事實關係 = 80
      • 2) 判決要旨 = 81
      • 3) 檢討 = 82
      • 3. 大判 90.12.26, 88 다카 20224. 「뱀장어 사건」 = 83
      • 1) 事實關係 = 84
      • 2) 判決要旨 = 84
      • 3) 檢討 = 85
      • 第5章 結論 = 89
      • 參考文獻 = 91
      • ABSTRACT = 97
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼