韓半島 軍備統制 發展方案 硏究 = (A) study on the arms control in the Korean peninsular

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Practical meaning of Arms Control is as varied as the views of many scholars and national political conditions. However, it is generally accepted that Arms Control is very important in securing initiative as an strategy of negotiation between countries which had tense political conditions to mitigate of threat of war.
It is global a tendency that the majority of nations in the late 20th century adopted Arms Reduction as a national military strategy increase national welfare and prosperity rather than use Arms Expansion as their key strategy. However, the overall situation is different in the Korean Peninsula where Arms expansion is the hottest issue for several decades. Although there were several efforts in Arms Control during 1960's, those results turned out to be nominal and superficial. The main reason for the failure of Arms Control in the region is due to the different view of both sides regarding their national strategy, military structure and operation. Additionally the limited and passive approaches in Arms Control for both militaries contributed to the situation.
There is consensus that Arms Control does not just affect military matters. Especially in Korean peninsular, Arms Control covers the total spectrum of national matters from politics, economy and social issues to South-North Korean bilateral relationship improvement, collaboration of US-Korean effort, bilateral economic support improvement and mitigation of threat of nuclear weapons. Therefore Arms Control should be the basis of South Korean national security. In order to implement an effective Arms Control policy, it is important that the 11 feasible solutions that I proposed in this thesis should be carefully implemented as the baseline of "Inter-Korea Basic Agreements" spirit.
Recently, the North Korean regime has taken drastic political measures to alleviate serious economic problems. Constructing of the Na-Jin, Sun-Bong special free trade area, Shin-Yeo-Ju special economic zone and Kae-Sung free trade district is a good example of their effort to draw western capital. They also benchmarked China's free market economy ideology in introducing western capitalism. However, the results are disappointing due to north Korea's limited opening of their market, excessive requirements, and limited opening policy. This was due to their fear of losing control of their country. For this reason, North Korea depends on an asymmetric military strategy that includes development of Weapon of Mass Destruction (WMD) and long range missiles that threaten all nations including US and South Korea in order to gain economic incentives when they negotiate Arms Control. In th end, they are trapped in a dilemma where the economic situation is getting worse and they must excessively expand money on the military in order to maintain a credible threat.
In conclusion, South Korea should take an active role in driving Arms Control to gain a superior position in regard to the wide range of national security based on military confidence building measures. Moreover, it is crucial to lessen the national security concerns that (이후원문누락)

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 目次 = ⅰ
• 第Ⅰ章 序論 = 1
• 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1
• 第2節 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 4
• 第Ⅱ章 軍備統制의 理論的 背景 = 6
• 第1節 軍備統制의 槪念과 機能 = 6
• 第2節 軍備統制의 類型 = 12
• 1. 參加國 數에 따른 區分 = 12
• 2. 統制對象(武器形態)에 따른 區分 = 13
• 3. 規側技法에 따른 區分 = 14
• 4. 統制方法에 따른 區分 = 15
• 第3節 軍備統制 決定要因과 段階 = 17
• 1. 軍備統制 決定要因 = 17
• 2. 軍備統制 段階 = 19
• 第Ⅲ章 韓半島軍備統制의 環境과 展開過程 = 22
• 第1節 東北亞 安保情勢 = 22
• 1. 美國의 新 安保戰略 = 26
• 2. 일본의 新 防衛戰略 = 28
• 3. 中國의 安保戰略 = 30
• 4. 러시아의 安保戰略 = 33
• 第2節 南北韓 軍備統制의 展開過程 = 35
• 1. 1990년대 이전 = 35
• 2. 1990년대 = 38
• 3. 國民의 政府 기간(1998~2002) = 40
• 4. 參與 政府의 군비통제정책 = 44
• 第Ⅳ章 韓半島 不振要因과 促進要因 = 45
• 第1節 南北韓 軍備統制의 不振原因 = 45
• 1. 南北關係의 狀況的 特殊性 = 47
• 2. 軍備統制에 대한 認識差異 = 49
• 3. 構造的 非對稱性 = 50
• 4. 軍備統制에 대한 接近方法의 偏狹性 = 51
• 第2節 南北韓 軍備統制 促進要因 = 53
• 1. 國際的 要因 = 53
• 2. 國內的 要因 = 55
• 第5章 南北韓 軍備統制의 發展方向 = 56
• 第1節 軍備統制 政策 推進方向 = 56
• 第2節 軍事的 信賴構築의 現狀과 問題點 = 62
• 第3節 南北基本合意書에 입각한 信賴構築 實現方案 = 68
• 1. 「南北基本合意書」의 內容 槪觀 = 68
• 2. 信賴構築의 前提條件 = 70
• 3. 信賴構築 實現方案 = 70
• 가. 宣言的 措置 = 71
• 나. 軍事的 透明性 措置 = 75
• 다. 軍事的 制限的 措置 = 86
• 第Ⅴ章 結論 = 96
• 參考文獻 = 100
• ABSTRACT = 105