RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    政策變動에 대한 中央行政機關의 組織改編 對應 : 産業資源部를 중심으로 = (The) Organization Changes in response to Policy Changes in Korea : The Case of Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9661071

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Since 1948 there were as many as 49 ministry-level organization changes in Korea. Moreover, in 1948, eleven ministries increased to eighteen ministries in 2004. However there were even more changes in the ministries. In 1948 there were 73 bureaus and 314 divisions in government. Yet, there are currently 333 bureaus and 1,152 divisions.
    The government argues it has changed the organizations in response to the policy changes. This paper is to study the organization changes in response to policy changes in Korea. The study has been done with the case of Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy through 1960 to 1985.
    First, I studied the influence of the policy change on the organizations in response to the size and the type of the policy change. The larger the size of the policy change is, the larger the needs of the organization change is. The cases of analyses were mainly policy innovations and non-linear succession of policy. After launching Five Year Economic Development Plan, the organization change occurred just six month later. However, the organization change took place just after the President Park declared to raise heavy and chemical industries in January 1973. Therefore, the history shows that the organization change depends upon the political status of the policy.
    Second, the reasons of organization changes were analyzed and confirmed that they were caused by the policy changes. However, it could be found that the bureaucratic interests were involved in the organization changes. When First Five Year Plan was renewed, the organizations were expected to shrink. Nevertheless, there were no changes in the organizations.
    Third, it was seen that the organization changes could lead to the policy change. The policy change was assumed to lead the organization change; however, it wasn't always true. The organization change sometimes led to the policy change. For further study, more policy changes should be analyzed.
    Chapter two shows that policy changes often lead to the organization changes, even though there are no clear theoretical relations between policy changes and organization changes. This study shows the result in the same direction.
    번역하기

    Since 1948 there were as many as 49 ministry-level organization changes in Korea. Moreover, in 1948, eleven ministries increased to eighteen ministries in 2004. However there were even more changes in the ministries. In 1948 there were 73 bureaus and ...

    Since 1948 there were as many as 49 ministry-level organization changes in Korea. Moreover, in 1948, eleven ministries increased to eighteen ministries in 2004. However there were even more changes in the ministries. In 1948 there were 73 bureaus and 314 divisions in government. Yet, there are currently 333 bureaus and 1,152 divisions.
    The government argues it has changed the organizations in response to the policy changes. This paper is to study the organization changes in response to policy changes in Korea. The study has been done with the case of Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy through 1960 to 1985.
    First, I studied the influence of the policy change on the organizations in response to the size and the type of the policy change. The larger the size of the policy change is, the larger the needs of the organization change is. The cases of analyses were mainly policy innovations and non-linear succession of policy. After launching Five Year Economic Development Plan, the organization change occurred just six month later. However, the organization change took place just after the President Park declared to raise heavy and chemical industries in January 1973. Therefore, the history shows that the organization change depends upon the political status of the policy.
    Second, the reasons of organization changes were analyzed and confirmed that they were caused by the policy changes. However, it could be found that the bureaucratic interests were involved in the organization changes. When First Five Year Plan was renewed, the organizations were expected to shrink. Nevertheless, there were no changes in the organizations.
    Third, it was seen that the organization changes could lead to the policy change. The policy change was assumed to lead the organization change; however, it wasn't always true. The organization change sometimes led to the policy change. For further study, more policy changes should be analyzed.
    Chapter two shows that policy changes often lead to the organization changes, even though there are no clear theoretical relations between policy changes and organization changes. This study shows the result in the same direction.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차 = ⅰ
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 연구 목적 = 1
    • 제2절 연구 범위 = 3
    • 제3절 연구 방법 = 6
    • 목차 = ⅰ
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 연구 목적 = 1
    • 제2절 연구 범위 = 3
    • 제3절 연구 방법 = 6
    • 제4절 연구 동향 = 7
    • 제2장 역사적·이론적 배경 = 11
    • 제1절 한국산업정책의 역사적 개관 = 11
    • 제2절 정책변동과 조직변화 = 17
    • 1. 정책변동의 형태 = 17
    • 2. 정책변동에 따른 조직변화 유형 = 26
    • 3. 정책변동과 조직개편의 관계성 = 29
    • 제3절 조직개편의 목적과 형태 = 35
    • 1. 행정조직개편의 일반적인 목적 = 35
    • 2. 조직개편 형태 = 49
    • 3. 조직개편 목적과 형태의 관계 = 53
    • 제4절 연구 설계 = 56
    • 1. 분석의 틀 = 56
    • 2. 자료수집방법 = 58
    • 3. 자료분석방법 = 59
    • 제3장 1960년대: 제1차 경제개발5개년계획의 착수 = 60
    • 제1절 정책 변동 = 60
    • 1. 배경 = 60
    • 2. 정책내용 = 64
    • 3. 정책변동의 분석 = 76
    • 제2절 조직개편 = 85
    • 1. 시기별 조직개편 내용 = 87
    • 2. 조직개편 분석 = 102
    • 제3절 정책변동과 조직개편의 관계 = 110
    • 제4장 1970년대: 중화학공업의 본격적 육성 = 113
    • 제1절 정책변동 = 113
    • 1. 배경 = 113
    • 2. 정책내용 = 123
    • 3. 정책변동의 분석 =134
    • 제2절 조직개편 = 139
    • 1. 시기별 개편 내용 = 139
    • 2. 개편 내용 분석 = 158
    • 제3절 정책변동과 조직개편의 관계 = 165
    • 제5장 1980년대: 개발정책기조의 전환 = 171
    • 제1절 정책변동 = 171
    • 1. 배경 = 171
    • 2. 정책내용 = 175
    • 3. 정책변동의 분석 = 185
    • 제2절 조직개편 분석 = 188
    • 1. 시기별 개편 내용 = 188
    • 2. 조직개편 분석 = 207
    • 제3절 정책변동과 조직개편의 관계 = 213
    • 제6장 정책변동과 조직개편의 연혁적 비교 = 216
    • 제1절 정책변동 = 216
    • 제2절 조직개편 = 224
    • 제3절 정책변동과 조직개편의 관계 = 239
    • 제7장 결론 = 247
    • 제1절 연구의 요약 = 247
    • 제2절 정책적 시사점 = 250
    • 제3절 연구의 한계 = 251
    • 참고문헌 = 253
    • ABSTRACT = 268
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼