This study investigates the three asymmetric nuclear/missile negotiations that took place between the United States and North Korea: the Yongbyon crisis (1993-4), the Kumchang-ri crisis (1998-9) and the Taepo-dong crisis (1999). By analyzing the varyi...
This study investigates the three asymmetric nuclear/missile negotiations that took place between the United States and North Korea: the Yongbyon crisis (1993-4), the Kumchang-ri crisis (1998-9) and the Taepo-dong crisis (1999). By analyzing the varying degrees of cooperation adopted by all parties during these negotiations, it argues that the outcomes of the negotiations can only be fully explained by the interrelationship of domestic and international variables. The dissertation raises the question as to 'when' and 'how' the US-DPRK asymmetric nuclear/missile negotiations succeeded politically.
In order to answer the above question, chapter two introduces contending theories of cooperation among nations and then discusses the shortcomings of existing theoretical approaches to international cooperation. Chapter three then presents the two-level game approach as an alternative framework for explaining variations in international cooperation. The next two chapters provide a historical background. Chapter four presents a contextual overview of US-DPRK nuclear/missile negotiations, discussing the preferences and coalitions among various domestic actors in the US and DPRK, as well as the motivating factors which explain how the two governments because entangled in negotiations. Chapter five explains the processes and profiles of the US-DPRK Yougbyon nuclear crisis between 1993 and the 1994 signing of the Geneva Agreed framework. Based on this, chapter six analyzes the outcomes of the Agreed framework and KEDO negotiations. In particular, this chapter examines those domestic variables and international factors which heavily influenced the size of the 'win-set' and, consequently, affected the process and outcome of the Yongbyon negotiations. chapter seven addresses the occurrence of two other crises on the Korean Peninsula, the Kumchagn-ri crisis and the Taepo-dong crisis, and explains why these negotiations concluded unfavourably for the United States. The concluding chapter provides a closer examination of these variables in the US-DPRK nuclear/missile negotiations. The major findings of this study are then summarized.