RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Economics and elections in South Korea and Taiwan

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9391235

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study undertakes a two-fold task. First, I probe the relationship between economic conditions and voter turnout at the national level elections in South Korea and Taiwan after the democratic transition in the mid-1980s. Second, I investigate the association between economic conditions and electoral support in the two countries' national elections in the 1990s. This study is based on the assumption that voters in these countries are not likely to be mobilized any longer as they have been under authoritarian regimes.
    Nonetheless, long lasting regional conflicts between Cholla province and Kyungsang province still have a significant impact on the decisions of who to vote for in South Korea. In Taiwan, traditional ethnic conflicts between the Taiwanese and the Mainlanders have significantly affected voters' choices. Regional and ethnic conflicts have been frequently utilized and manipulated by political leaders in maximizing their vote returns in the two nations. In this research project, I compare the effects of economic conditions on voting behavior with those of old regional (or ethnic) cleavages in each country. Also, I investigate the impacts of the socioeconomic factors, the social psychological factors, the political mobilization factors, and the party identification factors on voting behavior.
    I utilize the survey data sets from the Institute for Korean Election Studies (IKES) and the National Chengchi University (NCU). The IKES provides survey data for the 1992 and 1996 National Assembly elections and the 1992 and 1997 Presidential elections. The NCU conducted surveys for the 1992 and 1995 Legislative Yuan elections and the 1996 Presidential election. South Korea's National Assembly is equivalent to Taiwan's Legislative Yuan. In analyzing the survey data, I employ probit for the two-way choices, for instance, voters’ choice between vote and abstention or between two parties (or candidates). For the three-way choices, I employ multinomial logit.
    The main findings of the study are as follows: First, economic conditions appear to have had nothing to do with voter turnout in South Korea and Taiwan. Second, regional and ethnic cleavages were not significant for voter participation in South Korea and Taiwan, respectively. Third, genuine economic voting was evident in the most recent elections (the 1997 South Korean race and the 1996 Taiwanese election). Fourth, regionalism was consistently significant throughout the South Korean elections under study, while ethnic cleavages did not have a consistent impact on vote returns in Taiwan.
    번역하기

    This study undertakes a two-fold task. First, I probe the relationship between economic conditions and voter turnout at the national level elections in South Korea and Taiwan after the democratic transition in the mid-1980s. Second, I investigate the ...

    This study undertakes a two-fold task. First, I probe the relationship between economic conditions and voter turnout at the national level elections in South Korea and Taiwan after the democratic transition in the mid-1980s. Second, I investigate the association between economic conditions and electoral support in the two countries' national elections in the 1990s. This study is based on the assumption that voters in these countries are not likely to be mobilized any longer as they have been under authoritarian regimes.
    Nonetheless, long lasting regional conflicts between Cholla province and Kyungsang province still have a significant impact on the decisions of who to vote for in South Korea. In Taiwan, traditional ethnic conflicts between the Taiwanese and the Mainlanders have significantly affected voters' choices. Regional and ethnic conflicts have been frequently utilized and manipulated by political leaders in maximizing their vote returns in the two nations. In this research project, I compare the effects of economic conditions on voting behavior with those of old regional (or ethnic) cleavages in each country. Also, I investigate the impacts of the socioeconomic factors, the social psychological factors, the political mobilization factors, and the party identification factors on voting behavior.
    I utilize the survey data sets from the Institute for Korean Election Studies (IKES) and the National Chengchi University (NCU). The IKES provides survey data for the 1992 and 1996 National Assembly elections and the 1992 and 1997 Presidential elections. The NCU conducted surveys for the 1992 and 1995 Legislative Yuan elections and the 1996 Presidential election. South Korea's National Assembly is equivalent to Taiwan's Legislative Yuan. In analyzing the survey data, I employ probit for the two-way choices, for instance, voters’ choice between vote and abstention or between two parties (or candidates). For the three-way choices, I employ multinomial logit.
    The main findings of the study are as follows: First, economic conditions appear to have had nothing to do with voter turnout in South Korea and Taiwan. Second, regional and ethnic cleavages were not significant for voter participation in South Korea and Taiwan, respectively. Third, genuine economic voting was evident in the most recent elections (the 1997 South Korean race and the 1996 Taiwanese election). Fourth, regionalism was consistently significant throughout the South Korean elections under study, while ethnic cleavages did not have a consistent impact on vote returns in Taiwan.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • TABLE OF CONTENTS = viii
    • LIST OF TABLES = ix
    • KEY TO ABBREVIATIONS = xii
    • CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION = 1
    • 1. Hypotheses of the Dissertation = 1
    • TABLE OF CONTENTS = viii
    • LIST OF TABLES = ix
    • KEY TO ABBREVIATIONS = xii
    • CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION = 1
    • 1. Hypotheses of the Dissertation = 1
    • 2. Electoral Studies in South Korea and Taiwan = 3
    • 3. Scope of the Dissertation = 10
    • 4. Outline of the Dissertation = 17
    • CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW AND MODEL BUILDING = 19
    • 1. Models of Voter Turnout = 19
    • A. Economic Condition Model = 19
    • B. Socioeconomic Model = 21
    • C. Social Psychological Model = 23
    • D. Political Mobilization Model = 25
    • E. Close Election Model = 26
    • 2. Models of Economic Voting = 29
    • A. Economic Voting Model = 29
    • B. Sociotropic Voting and Pocketbook Voting = 40
    • C. Retrospective Voting and Prospective Voting = 42
    • CHAPTER III VOTER TURNOUT IN SOUTH KOREA = 48
    • 1. Model Specification and Methodology = 48
    • 2. Statistical Models = 52
    • 3. Voter Turnout in South Korea = 54
    • A. The National Assembly Elections = 54
    • The March 1992 National Assembly Election = 57
    • The April 1996 National Assembly Election = 58
    • B. The Presidential Elections = 59
    • The December 1992 Presidential Election = 60
    • The December 1997 Presidential Election = 64
    • 4. Conclusions = 67
    • CHAPTER IV VOTER TURNOUT IN TAIWAN = 72
    • 1. Model Specification and Methodology = 72
    • 2. Statistical Models = 74
    • 3. Voter Turnout in Taiwan = 76
    • A. The Legislative Yuan Elections = 76
    • The December 1992 Legislative Yuan Election = 76
    • The December 1995 Legislative Yuan Election = 79
    • B. The Presidential Election = 80
    • The March 1996 Presidential Election = 80
    • 4. Conclusions = 83
    • CHAPTER V ECONOMIC VOTING IN SOUTH KOREA = 85
    • 1. Model Specification and Methodology = 85
    • 2. Statistical Models = 90
    • 3. Economic Voting in South Korea = 91
    • A. The National Assembly Elections = 91
    • The March 1992 National Assembly Election = 91
    • The April 1996 National Assembly Election = 96
    • B. The Presidential Elections = 99
    • The December 1992 Presidential Election = 99
    • The December 1997 Presidential Election = 106
    • 4. Economic Voting and Regionalism = 112
    • 5. Conclusions = 118
    • CHAPTER VI ECONOMIC VOTING IN TAIWAN = 121
    • 1. Model Specification and Methodology = 121
    • 2. Statistical Models = 124
    • 3. Economic Voting in Taiwan = 126
    • A. The Legislative Yuan Elections = 126
    • The December 1992 Legislative Yuan Election = 126
    • The December 1995 Legislative Yuan Election = 129
    • B. The Presidential Election = 135
    • The March 1996 Presidential Election = 135
    • 4. Economic Voting and Ethnic Voting = 139
    • 5. Conclusions = 142
    • CHAPTER VII CONCLUSIONS = 145
    • APPENDIX A SOUTH KOREAN SURVEY DATA = 156
    • APPENDIX B TAIWANESE SURVEY DATA = 158
    • APPENDIX C SURVEY QUESTIONS = 160
    • APPENDIX D MULTINOMIAL LOGIT ESTIMATES FOR THE THREE-PARTY MODELS: THE 1995 LEGISLATIVE YUAN ELECTION (COEFFICIENTS FOR THE KMT'S NORMALIZED TO ZERO), TAIWAN = 164
    • LITERATURE CITED = 165
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼