RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Global strategic alliances : analysis of underlying motivations

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8871542

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Companies must prepare themselves to compete better globally as the 21^(st) century approaches. Forming global strategic alliances would be the most effective way to become globally competitive. Whether an alliance turns out to be a success or a failure, it is important to understand their underlying motivations.
    As we study each motivation with its most relevant case, we were able to reach two findings regarding strategic alliances. First finding emphasizes the interdependencies of technology transfer, global competition, industry convergence, and learning motives. Meaning, strategic alliances are driven by multiple motivations that are inter-related with different degree of priorities. Then, finding 2 illustrates the point that once firms enter strategic alliances, they are exposed to more risks. Firms need to calculate trade-offs associated with them.
    Basically these two findings may be categorized as expected effect and realized effect. Firms expect that strategic alliances would generate more positive outcomes such as gaining advanced technology and skills as well as becoming globally competitive and an industry leader. What happens after these alliances were actually created? They realize that they are exposed to more risks such as your partner joins with another competitor or steals your intangible resources.
    In Korea, strategic alliances may become more effective if Korean firms do not view strategic alliances as ways to escape from certain dilemma. They must continuously make improvements in order to contribute their skills to create synergy effect as well as to offer some benefits to their foreign partners.
    One of the main reasons why firms still prefer strategic alliances regardless of these potential risks would be that they believe benefits outweigh risks associated with them.
    번역하기

    Companies must prepare themselves to compete better globally as the 21^(st) century approaches. Forming global strategic alliances would be the most effective way to become globally competitive. Whether an alliance turns out to be a success or a failu...

    Companies must prepare themselves to compete better globally as the 21^(st) century approaches. Forming global strategic alliances would be the most effective way to become globally competitive. Whether an alliance turns out to be a success or a failure, it is important to understand their underlying motivations.
    As we study each motivation with its most relevant case, we were able to reach two findings regarding strategic alliances. First finding emphasizes the interdependencies of technology transfer, global competition, industry convergence, and learning motives. Meaning, strategic alliances are driven by multiple motivations that are inter-related with different degree of priorities. Then, finding 2 illustrates the point that once firms enter strategic alliances, they are exposed to more risks. Firms need to calculate trade-offs associated with them.
    Basically these two findings may be categorized as expected effect and realized effect. Firms expect that strategic alliances would generate more positive outcomes such as gaining advanced technology and skills as well as becoming globally competitive and an industry leader. What happens after these alliances were actually created? They realize that they are exposed to more risks such as your partner joins with another competitor or steals your intangible resources.
    In Korea, strategic alliances may become more effective if Korean firms do not view strategic alliances as ways to escape from certain dilemma. They must continuously make improvements in order to contribute their skills to create synergy effect as well as to offer some benefits to their foreign partners.
    One of the main reasons why firms still prefer strategic alliances regardless of these potential risks would be that they believe benefits outweigh risks associated with them.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Table of Contents
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS = i
    • ABSTRACT = iii
    • CHAPTER 1 : INTRODUCTION = 1
    • 1.1 Background = 1
    • Table of Contents
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS = i
    • ABSTRACT = iii
    • CHAPTER 1 : INTRODUCTION = 1
    • 1.1 Background = 1
    • 1.2 Method = 1
    • CHAPTER 2 : MOTIVATIONS & RISKS OF STRATEGIC ALLIANCES = 3
    • 2.1 Trends = 3
    • 2.2 Motivations = 3
    • 2.3 Risks = 5
    • CHAPTER 3 : CASE STUDIES ON STRATEGIC ALLIANCES = 7
    • 3.1 Motivation 1 : Technology Transfer = 7
    • 3.2 Motivation 2 : Global Competition = 14
    • 3.3 Motivation 3 : Industry Convergence = 19
    • 3.4 Motivation 4 : Race to Learn = 23
    • CHAPTER 4 : ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS = 31
    • 4.1 Finding 1 : Interdependencies of Motivations = 31
    • 4.2 Finding 2 : Trade-offs of Strategic Alliances = 34
    • CHAPTER 5 : CONCLUSION = 40
    • 5.1 Summary = 40
    • 5.2 Implication 1 : Expected Effect vs. Realized Effect = 41
    • 5.3 Implication 2 : Strategic Alliances in Korea = 42
    • REFERENCES = 45
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼