RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    SCIENCE IN PUBLIC : TRENDS AND DETERMINANTS OF PUBLIC ATTITUDES TOWARD SCIENCE

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8555823

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    As science and technology have exerted their influence across the whole range of the structure and functioning of contemporary society, the question of how the public perceives science has attracted growing attention from the scientific community and social scientists. This dissertation addresses this question by examining the social determinants of public attitudes toward science and the trends of these attitudes. Using the U.S. Science and Engineering Indicators Survey and the General Social Survey, this dissertation examines the effects of the level of scientific knowledge, the amount of education, the content of education, gender, race, income, the general tendency to trust in social institutions, and political ideology, along with other sociodemographic variables, on attitudes toward science in general and on attitudes toward specific applications of scientific research.
    The results of this study highlight the limitations of the deficit model of public understanding of and support for science and technology, which attributes public skepticism about science and technology to the public's low level of scientific knowledge. This study shows that emphasizing the effect of the level of scientific knowledge while ignoring the effect of other dimensions of education exaggerates the role that the level of scientific knowledge plays in shaping attitudes toward science. This study also shows that the effect of the level of scientific knowledge on attitudes toward specific controversial applications of science and technology is far weaker than that on attitudes toward science in general, which demonstrates the limitation of the deficit model as an explanation of public resistance to controversial sciences and technologies.
    By analyzing trends in public attitudes toward science among survey data accumulated for three decades, this study also tests whether public confidence in science has declined, as is claimed by many scientists and theories of late modernity, and examines whether the overall trends mask some diverging trends across important social groups. The trend analysis shows that while public confidence in science has been quite stable over the last three decades, the gap across race and educational levels tended to increase during the 1990s.
    번역하기

    As science and technology have exerted their influence across the whole range of the structure and functioning of contemporary society, the question of how the public perceives science has attracted growing attention from the scientific community and ...

    As science and technology have exerted their influence across the whole range of the structure and functioning of contemporary society, the question of how the public perceives science has attracted growing attention from the scientific community and social scientists. This dissertation addresses this question by examining the social determinants of public attitudes toward science and the trends of these attitudes. Using the U.S. Science and Engineering Indicators Survey and the General Social Survey, this dissertation examines the effects of the level of scientific knowledge, the amount of education, the content of education, gender, race, income, the general tendency to trust in social institutions, and political ideology, along with other sociodemographic variables, on attitudes toward science in general and on attitudes toward specific applications of scientific research.
    The results of this study highlight the limitations of the deficit model of public understanding of and support for science and technology, which attributes public skepticism about science and technology to the public's low level of scientific knowledge. This study shows that emphasizing the effect of the level of scientific knowledge while ignoring the effect of other dimensions of education exaggerates the role that the level of scientific knowledge plays in shaping attitudes toward science. This study also shows that the effect of the level of scientific knowledge on attitudes toward specific controversial applications of science and technology is far weaker than that on attitudes toward science in general, which demonstrates the limitation of the deficit model as an explanation of public resistance to controversial sciences and technologies.
    By analyzing trends in public attitudes toward science among survey data accumulated for three decades, this study also tests whether public confidence in science has declined, as is claimed by many scientists and theories of late modernity, and examines whether the overall trends mask some diverging trends across important social groups. The trend analysis shows that while public confidence in science has been quite stable over the last three decades, the gap across race and educational levels tended to increase during the 1990s.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Dedication = i
    • Acknowledgement = ii
    • Table of Contents = iv
    • Abstract = ix
    • CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
    • Dedication = i
    • Acknowledgement = ii
    • Table of Contents = iv
    • Abstract = ix
    • CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
    • 1.1. INTRODUCTION = 1
    • 1.2. OVERVIEW OF THE ANALYSIS = 9
    • ENDNOTES = 13
    • CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW THE STATUS OF SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC'S MIND
    • 2.1. INTRODUCTION = 16
    • 2.2. SOCIAL THEORIES OF LATE MODERNITY: THE LEGITIMACY CRISIS OF SCIENCE? = 18
    • 2.2.1. Jurgen Habermas: The Premise of the Enlightenment Ideal of Science = 19
    • 2.2.2. Anthony Giddens and Ulrich Beck: Reflexive Modernity and Science = 20
    • 2.2.3. Lyotard: The Legitimacy Crisis of Science = 22
    • 2.2.4. Summary = 23
    • 2.3. QUALITATIVE CASE STUDIES OF THE PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE (PUS) = 25
    • 2.3.1. Problematizing Science = 27
    • 2.3.2. (Re)Conceptualizing Science(s) = 30
    • 2.3.3. Summary = 32
    • 2.4. PUBLIC OPINION STUDIES OF ATTITUDES TOWARD SCIENCE = 34
    • 2.4.1. Education and the Deficit Model of Public Support for Science = 37
    • 2.4.2. The Level of Scientific Knowledge and Years of Schooling = 39
    • 2.4.3. The Science Wars and the Effect of Educational Content = 41
    • 2.4.4. Gender, Race, Social Class, and Other Determinants ofAttitudes toward Science = 44
    • 2.4.5. Summary: Some Limitations of Past Survey Research on Public Attitudes toward
    • Science = 48
    • ENDNOTES = 50
    • CHAPTER3: DATA, MEASUREMENT OF VARIABLES, AND METHODS
    • 3.1. INTRODUCTION = 52
    • 3.2. DATA = 53
    • 3.2.1. Science & Engineering Indicators Surveys = 53
    • 3.2.2. General Social Survey = 55
    • 3.2.3. Sample Representativeness = 57
    • 3.3. MEASUREMENT OF VARIABLES = 58
    • 3.3.1. Measures of Dependent Variables: the SEIS = 58
    • 3.3.2. Measures of Dependent Variables: the GSS = 59
    • 3,3.3, Measures of Independent Variables and Control Variables = 60
    • 3.3.4. Treatment of Missing Cases = 64
    • 3.4. METHODS = 66
    • 3.5. SUMNIARY = 69
    • ENDNOTES = 70
    • CHAPTER 4: EDUCATION AND PUBLIC ATTITUDES TOWARD SCLENCE: TESTING THE DEFICIT MODEL
    • 4.1. INTRODUCTION = 83
    • 4.2. THE DEFICIT MODEL OF PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE AND IT'S IDEOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS = 84
    • 4.3. ANALYTIC APPROACH = 89
    • 4.4. EMPIRICAL RESULTS = 91
    • 4.4.1. Effects of Years of Schooling and Levels of Scientific Knowledge on Attitudes toward Science = 91
    • 4.4.2. Testing the Effects of Educational Content = 95
    • 4.4.3. Education and Public Attitudes toward Controversial Scientific Research = 96
    • 4.5. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION = 104
    • ENDNOTES = 109
    • CHAPTER 5: SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF PUBLIC ATTITUDES TOWARD SCIENCE
    • 5.1. INTRODUCTION = 122
    • 5.2. TESTING THE EFFECTS OF EDUCATION AND GENDER ON ATTITUDES TOWARD SCAIENCE = 123
    • 5.3. EFFECTS OF RACE, INCOME, POLITICAL IDEOLOGY, AND RELIGION = 125
    • 5.4. EXPLAINING THE EFFECT OF YEARS OF SCHOOLING, THE RACE GAP, 4ND THE GENDER GAP = 129
    • 5.4.1. Decomposition of the Effect of Years of Schooling on Attitudes toward Science = 130
    • 5.4.2. Decomposition of Race Differences in Attitudes toward Science = 131
    • 5.4.3. Decomposition of Gender Differences in Attitudes toward Science = 133
    • 5.5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION = 134
    • ENDNOTES = 137
    • CHAPTER 6: TRENDS IN PUBLIC ATTITUDES TOWARD SCIENCE
    • 5.1.INTRODUCTION = 147
    • 5.2. ANALYTIC APPROACH = 148
    • 5.3. OVERALL TRENDS IN ATTITUDES TOWARD SCIENCE IN GENERAL = 149
    • 5.3.1. The Results of the Analysis of the GSS, 1973-1998 = 149
    • 5.3.2. The Results of the Analysis of the SEIS, 1979-1997 = 152
    • 6.4. TRENDS IN ATTITUDES TOWARD SCIENCE BY GENDER, RACE, INCOME, AND EDUCATIONAL LEVEL = 154
    • 6.4.1. Gender and Trends in Attitudes toward Science = 154
    • 6.4.2. Race, Income, and Trends in Attitudes toward Science = 156
    • 6.4.3. Education and Trends in Attitudes toward Science = 158
    • 6.5. TRENDS IN ATTITUDES TOWARD SCIENCE IN PARTICULAR = 159
    • 6.5.1. The Overall Trends = 159
    • 6.5.2. Trend Differences by Gender and Educational Levels = 160
    • 6.6. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION = 161
    • ENDNOTES = 165
    • CHAPTER 7: DETERMINANTS AND TRENDS OF ATTITUDES TOWARD SCIENCESUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
    • 7.1. DETERMINANTS = 217
    • 7.2. TRENDS = 221
    • BIBLIOGRAPHY = 226
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼