TV 코미디 프로그램의 제작환경과 개선방향에 관한 연구 : 연출자의 프로그램 제작환경 요인을 중심으로 = (The) study of construcution environments and improvement of domestic TV comedy program : Focusing on director's influences of making program

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

TV comedy program is related with real life. Therefore, TV comedy program, an important genre of an amusemental media culture is needed to study, because of the most amusemental genre and the most popular entertainment program in TV programs. Comedy is accompany with a laugh and the laugh should have universality. It is difficult to cause a laugh in comedy genre, because a laugh should have universality. So people thinks that a laugh causes easily and is not important. Therefore, a laugh is criticized as a lower things.
When researchers analysis mass culture text like TV comedy, have usually some problems. Researchers must select a studying view, method which is the most appropriate. TV comedy programs produce a laugh and spread it. This have influence on a moral belief and a common emotion. Especially, young people is influenced by it.
The Object of this studying find a social meaning of comedy programs, and a progressive quality factor of comedy programs. An studying of a laugh can prospect social functions of TV comedy programs.
Research findings
1. What is a concept and a characteristic of comedy, and what have comedy socially?
2. Some factors have influence on a broadcasting producers which makes a TV comedy programs. So what is some factors?
3. Comedy programs must produce an upright direction. How can do this?
To solve research findings, this studying paper focuses on a directors, and investigates a factors of productive environment, director's cognition of audience, comedy programs.
First, this studying investigates a productive environment and a control factors.
Directors thinks that TV programs can be depreciated by an audience rating. Therefore, Directors usually makes a copying programs than a creative and originative programs and depend on a TV star. But directors think that a public managed broadcasting station must produce a public entertainment programs.
Second, cognition of comedy programs is concluded a following analysis.
A main subject of comedy program selects a following matters. In turn, "usual issue", "allegory", "film adaptation", "politics". This is shown that comedy programs is difficult to select a politics matters. A politics matters in comedy program appears SBS, MBC, KBS in turn.
A laugh in comedy program usually is caused by "reverse turn" and "exaggeration". Also, a language in comedy program usually is spoken "insulting language".
Third, a productive process of comedy program must consider both a exterior problems and a interior problems.
To solve this problems, directors have a professional specialty, knowledge and broadcasting organization should be changed. People working a broadcasting station superficially have autonomy and exclusion, but actually they accept a requirement of a body, the broadcasting organization.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제1장. 서론 = 1
• 제1절 연구 목적 = 1
• 제2절 연구 문제 = 4
• 제2장. 텔레비전 코미디에 관한 이론적 배경 = 5
• 제1절 코미디의 기원과 개념 = 5
• 1. 코미디의 기원 = 5
• 2. 코미디의 개념 = 8
• (1) 웃음의 의미 = 8
• (2) 코미디의 개념 = 12
• 3. 텔레비전 코미디의 등장과 한계 = 15
• (1) 텔레비전 코미디의 등장 = 15
• (2) 웃음의 요인 = 17
• 제2절 텔레비전 코미디에 관한 사회적 의제 = 22
• 1.텔레비전 코미디의 웃음 = 22
• (1) 웃음과 의미작용 = 22
• (2) 웃음의 폭력성 = 22
• (3) 웃음의 선정성 = 24
• (4) 웃음의 풍자성 = 25
• 2. 텔레비전 코미디의 사회적 논의 = 27
• 제3절 국내 코미디 프로그램의 제작환경 = 28
• 1. 코미디 프로그램의 다양한 통제요인 = 28
• (1) 코미디 프로그램의 제작환경과 통제요인 = 28
• (2) 제작자의 전문의식과 방송제도 = 29
• 2. 해외의 코미디 프로그램 현황 = 32
• 3. 국내 코미디 프로그램의 현황 = 40
• (1) 방송 3사의 코미디 프로그램 = 40
• (2) 국내 코미디 프로그램의 문제점과 전개방향 = 43
• 제3장. 설문조사 = 45
• 제1절 방법 및 대상 = 45
• 1. 조사 방법 = 45
• 2. 조사 대상 = 45
• 3. 설문의 구성 = 46
• 제2절 자료 처리 분석 = 47
• 제4장. 조사결과 및 논의 = 48
• 제1절 연구결과 = 48
• 1. 제작자들의 일반적인 특징 = 48
• 2. 프로그램 제작환경에 대한 인식 = 50
• (1) 제작자들의 프로그램 제작환경에 대한 인식 = 50
• (2) 제작자들의 시청자에 대한 인식 = 57
• 3. 코미디 프로그램과 관련된 분석 = 59
• 제2절 평가 및 분석 = 66
• 1. 연출자들의 프로그램 제작환경에 대한 인식 = 66
• 2. 코미디 프로그램에 대한 인식 = 67
• 3. 코미디 프로그램의 제작방향 = 69
• 제5장. 결론 = 71
• 제1절 요약 및 결론 = 71
• 제2절 한계 및 제언 = 75
• <참고문헌> = 76
• = 79
• < 부 록 > = 82