地方自治團體의 政策決定事例에 關한 硏究 : 全南道廳移轉과 光州·全南統合政策을 中心으로 = (A) Study on the policy making case of local government : focused on the policy of Chonnam Provincial Office transfer & Kwangju·Chonnam integration

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study is intended to look into the desirable process of public policy making, particularly by reviewing both the transfer policy of Chonnam Provincial Office and Kwangju·Chonnam integration, on the basis of analysis on significant policy making cases of local governments.
This paper is made up of five chapters. The first chapter deals with goal, scope, and methodology of study and the second explains the definition and process of policy making, followed by major policy making theories, including Allison model.
The third chapter reviews the case of the transfer policy of Chonnam Provincial Office and the procedures of Kwangju·Chonnam Integration. The transfer of Chonnam Provincial Office was delayed in the final decision-making stage, irrespective of its complete project to select alternative place for the office, after the government decision to the effect in 1993.
Then, the provincial governor-elect in June local election in 1995, has proceeded to integrate Kwangju City and Chonnam Province into an united area, which resulted in putting-off of the initiative up until the late 1998. In the wake of the policy failure, the transfer policy remains as of the presence. In the process, seven propensities have emerged : the excessive influence of local government head, the weakness of local council for checking the executive power, the lack of instrument enough to converge public opinion, and the easy-going attitude of central government and structural limitations of party system, and so on.
The problems of the policy-making process are analyzed by the theoretical framework of Allison Model in the fourth chapter. As a result, following problems are suggested. First, there was short of rational decision-making in the integration policy. Second, local government was heavily depended on the capacity of its head. Third, the policy was initiated without sincere reviews of reality-check on the policy agenda setting, creating many conflicts between the two governments.
The fifth chapter makes conclusions. Chonnam government has political controversy and temporal sub-regional conflicts in the renewed policy drive to integrate Kwangju City and Chonnam Province. That is, the transfer policy of provincial office became the object of political model, rather than that of rational model, revealing limitations, such as political reconciliation and lack of policy consistence, regardless of its importance as deciding a destiny of the region as a whole.
Therefore, three alternatives are pinpointed, in order to realize desirable policy making : prudent setting of policy agenda, optimal choice of policy instrument, and rational management of policy changes. We are faced with sizeable changes and uncertainty in the 21st century. Local governments should, in this line, seek rational and democratic decisions in policy making.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• 第1章 序論 = 3
• 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 3
• 第2節 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 4
• 1. 硏究의 內容 및 範圍 = 4
• 2. 硏究의 方法 = 5
• 第2章 政策決定에 關한 理論的 考察 = 7
• 第1節 政策決定의 槪念과 過程 = 7
• 1. 政策決定의 槪念 = 7
• 2. 政策決定의 過程 = 8
• 第2節 政策決定의 理論模型 = 11
• 1. 理論模型의 槪觀 = 11
• 2. Allison의 세 가지 模型 = 12
• 第3章 全南道廳移轉과 光州·全南 統合 推進事例 調査 = 15
• 第1節 全南道廳移轉과 光州·全南 統合 推進 經緯 = 15
• 1. 事例調査 背景 = 15
• 2. 1次 道廳移轉 推進 = 15
• 3. 光州·全南 統合 推進 = 22
• 4. 道廳移轉 再推進 = 30
• 第2節 他道의 道廳移轉 事例와의 比較 = 37
• 1. 政府主導下에 決定된 事例 = 37
• 2. 自治團體 主導下에 論議中인 事例 = 38
• 第3節 移轉 및 統合에 關한 政策決定 過程上의 特徵 = 40
• 1. 政治性 問題 = 40
• 2. 地域葛藤 問題 = 45
• 3. 團體長의 影響力 問題 = 50
• 4. 地方議會의 役割 問題 = 53
• 5. 住民輿論收斂裝置의 問題 = 56
• 6. 中央政府의 姿勢 問題 = 58
• 7. 政黨의 構造的 限界 問題 = 61
• 第4章 問題點 및 評價 = 64
• 第5章 要約 및 結論 = 69
• <參考文獻> = 72
• = 79