RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      유럽共同體의 國際法的 特性에 관한 考察 : 超國家性을 中心으로 = (A) Study of the Characteristics of the European Community in International Law : Specifically, of its Supra-Nationality

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T753324

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        부산 : 釜山大學校 大學院, 1987

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(석사) -- 부산대학교 대학원 , 법학과 , 1987. 2

      • 발행연도

        1987

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • KDC

        322.832 판사항(4)

      • DDC

        341.750614 판사항(19)

      • 발행국(도시)

        부산

      • 형태사항

        103p. ; 26cm

      • 일반주기명

        참고문헌: p. 99-103

      • DOI식별코드
      • 소장기관
        • 강원대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 경북대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 국립창원대학교 도서관 (창원캠퍼스) 소장기관정보
        • 동국대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 부산대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 인제대학교 백인제기념도서관 소장기관정보
        • 전남대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 충남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 충북대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The European Community appeared as a supra-national organization after World War Ⅱ. The purpose of this thesis is to observe this supra-nationality of the European Community and its meaning on the traditional international law.
      The supra-national character of the European Community can be observed from two points of view, organizational and legal, as the Treaties establishing it are both organizational and normative.
      From the organizational point of view, it is supranational in its composition, power, and voting systems of its organs.
      First, the organs of European Community are composed of people who are concerned only for the interests of the Community and act independently without receiving and order or interference from the Member States. The only exception is the Council which is composed of the Ministers of the Member States.
      Second, the Community has its own decision-making power which is exercised mainly by the Council, and its policy is executed through its own organ, the Commission. The Court of Justice has compulsory and exclusive jurisdiction over various kinds of actions. The Assembly has supervisory and advisory competence and some substantial budgetary power.
      Third, the Council, which is inter-governmental organ, has both majority voting system and weighted voting system. These voting systems show the most conspicuous supra-national character in the European Community.
      The Community legal order also shows high supra-nationality.
      First, the Community has its own, namely secondary, sources of law besides the primary sources of law, the Treaties and Conventions concluded among the Member States. No other international organization has its own legal sources comparable to these.
      Second, the Community Treaties are self-executing and all Community Law has direct effect upon individuals of Member States including both natural and legal person. This means the recognition of individual as the subject of international law.
      Third, Community Law has supremacy over the national law of the Member States. This supremacy is based on the ruling by the Community Court that Community constitutes a new legal order in international law, for whose benefit Member States limited and transferred their sovereigh right in a limited field.
      Thus observed, European Community has supra-national character both in its organizational and legal aspect, which no other precedent in international organizations comparable to can be found.
      European Community, though it has its own limitations and is faced with resistance from national sovereignty, is the most supra-national organization in the world and marks a new phase in the evolution of international law.
      번역하기

      The European Community appeared as a supra-national organization after World War Ⅱ. The purpose of this thesis is to observe this supra-nationality of the European Community and its meaning on the traditional international law. The supra-national c...

      The European Community appeared as a supra-national organization after World War Ⅱ. The purpose of this thesis is to observe this supra-nationality of the European Community and its meaning on the traditional international law.
      The supra-national character of the European Community can be observed from two points of view, organizational and legal, as the Treaties establishing it are both organizational and normative.
      From the organizational point of view, it is supranational in its composition, power, and voting systems of its organs.
      First, the organs of European Community are composed of people who are concerned only for the interests of the Community and act independently without receiving and order or interference from the Member States. The only exception is the Council which is composed of the Ministers of the Member States.
      Second, the Community has its own decision-making power which is exercised mainly by the Council, and its policy is executed through its own organ, the Commission. The Court of Justice has compulsory and exclusive jurisdiction over various kinds of actions. The Assembly has supervisory and advisory competence and some substantial budgetary power.
      Third, the Council, which is inter-governmental organ, has both majority voting system and weighted voting system. These voting systems show the most conspicuous supra-national character in the European Community.
      The Community legal order also shows high supra-nationality.
      First, the Community has its own, namely secondary, sources of law besides the primary sources of law, the Treaties and Conventions concluded among the Member States. No other international organization has its own legal sources comparable to these.
      Second, the Community Treaties are self-executing and all Community Law has direct effect upon individuals of Member States including both natural and legal person. This means the recognition of individual as the subject of international law.
      Third, Community Law has supremacy over the national law of the Member States. This supremacy is based on the ruling by the Community Court that Community constitutes a new legal order in international law, for whose benefit Member States limited and transferred their sovereigh right in a limited field.
      Thus observed, European Community has supra-national character both in its organizational and legal aspect, which no other precedent in international organizations comparable to can be found.
      European Community, though it has its own limitations and is faced with resistance from national sovereignty, is the most supra-national organization in the world and marks a new phase in the evolution of international law.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차 = 2
      • Summary = 5
      • 第1章 序論 = 9
      • 第2章 유럽統合理念과 유럽共同體의 登場 = 12
      • 1. 統合理念과 共同體 = 12
      • 목차 = 2
      • Summary = 5
      • 第1章 序論 = 9
      • 第2章 유럽統合理念과 유럽共同體의 登場 = 12
      • 1. 統合理念과 共同體 = 12
      • 2. 유럽統合運動의 歷史的 背景 = 13
      • 3. 유럽共同體의 成立過程 = 16
      • (1) 第2次世界大戰後의 유럽統合運動의 展開 = 16
      • (2) 유럽共同體의 成立過程 = 19
      • 第3章 유럽共同體의 國際組織的 性格 = 23
      • 1. 序論 = 23
      • 2. 유럽共同體 機關 = 24
      • (1) 槪要 = 24
      • (2) 委員會 = 26
      • a) 構成과 票決 = 26
      • b) 機能과 權限 = 29
      • (3) 理事會 = 31
      • a) 構成과 票決 = 31
      • b) 機能과 權限 = 34
      • (4) 議會 = 36
      • a) 構成과 票決 = 36
      • b) 機能과 權限 = 38
      • c) 議會權限의 擴大問題 = 41
      • (5) 法院 = 43
      • a) 構成 = 43
      • b) 管轄權 = 44
      • 3. 유럽共同體의 國際組織的 超國家性 = 51
      • (1) 機關의 權限 = 51
      • a) 理事會와 委員會의 權限 = 51
      • b) 議會의 權限 = 52
      • c) 法院의 管轄權 = 53
      • (2) 機關의 構成 = 55
      • (3) 票決 = 58
      • (4) 財政 = 60
      • (5) 超國家性의 限界 = 61
      • 第4章 유럽共同體法의 性格 = 63
      • 1. 共同體法의 法源 = 63
      • (1) 第1次的 法源 = 64
      • a) 條約 = 64
      • b) 會員國 사이의 協約 = 65
      • c) 共同體에 의해 締結된 條約 = 66
      • (2) 第2次的 法原 = 67
      • a) 規則 = 67
      • b) 命令 = 68
      • c) 決定 = 69
      • d) 勸告와 意見 = 70
      • e) 共同體法院의 判決 = 71
      • 2. 共同體法과 會院國의 國內法 = 73
      • (1) 共同體法과 國內法의 關係 = 73
      • (2) 共同體法의 直接約 效力 = 74
      • a) 直接的 效力의 意味 = 74
      • b) 直接的 效力의 根據와 標準 = 76
      • c) 條約의 直接的 效力 = 78
      • d) 規則의 直接的 效力 = 79
      • e) 命令과 決定의 直接的 效力 = 80
      • (3) 共同體法의 優位 = 82
      • a) 共同體法과 國內法의 衝突 = 82
      • b) 共同體法의 優位와 그 根據 = 84
      • 3. 共同體法의 超國家性 = 89
      • (1) 共同體法의 法源의 超國家性 = 89
      • (2) 個人의 國際法主體性 = 91
      • (3) 共同體法의 優位 = 93
      • 第5章 結論 = 95
      • 參考文獻 = 99
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼