韓國의 테러리즘 槪念定立에 관한 硏究

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study was started because the concept establishment of an issue decides the skill,in detail, of application which prevents terrorism. In order to counter to prevent or minimize concept establishment was perceived as a paramounmt issue.
For the logical study of concept, establishment,a historical background study was conducted. The characteristics of that peculiar period includes ordinary crimes, religious aspects and purpose, political goals and protest and the concept of war. It. is concluded that the historical background was a direct element which caused the concept.
By studying major examples of the definition "violence " "□ar and "thought or action" were the phrases used to express this definition. But in order to detail the concept and by laying out all of the types it caused of its own, a restriction for its application is ensued.
Looking at treaties one could discover efforts to establish relations with political criminals. But there were none to be found for relations of nations. Lonking at the example in connection with the issue of definition, the hijacking of a Chinese civilian airliner shows that the Hague Convention which is the international law and the local law of safe transit of aircraft has contributed the process of the incident. But the issue of the political criminals was both looked at an opposite perspective from the prosecution and the dafending lawyers. From these facts and presumptions we can see the importance of establishing laws, rules and regulations.
As a result of comparing the concept , type, fundamentals, purpose and process of war with terrorism one can find that "violent act," "a continuation of politics by other means," "force one's will" all have a collaboration with the concept of terror. Also a great deal of difference exists in its definition and larger portions which coincide with each other caused terror to be as a type of war whereby it was cross-used or used in the same context . Especially considering whether it is a peace time or war time or whether to apply war time laws affected the two warring parties and organizations' conduct. Regarding the status of the person committing terror in accordance to the Geneva convention law on prisoners and the position of smaller contries and of liberation armies to justify terrorism was evident. By admitting terrorism to be the same as war could cause confusion on the concept and definition of warring parties,warring organizations and combatants. This could also lead to a result opposite to the goal of restriction of terrorism. Therefore, the conclusion appears to be that in defining terrorism as a type of war with the already established concept of war is not adequate.
By comparing the relations between terror and simular concept to view terror as a portion of violent strategy for social change, there was no need to discuss this aspect and it is need to be totally differentiated from comparing with the urban guerillas. ln respect to relations with unconventional warfare special consideration is needed for the Korean situation. Also there were aspects for confusion on the "resistance movements" and the partisan warfare. Concerning the relationship between terrorism and overthrowing of government, the need to look at the concept of the definition "public" was evident.
A conclusion came about that is seen from the international law's perspective that a large portion of Korean terrorists need to be prevented from becoming war criminals under the name of political criminal.
Establishing the concept of terrorism in Korea consideration for recent Korean situation shows that international society needs to strengthen its cooperation and that they will request all larger share in the role of terrorism and with this possibility growing each nations needs to have a perfect preparation. As the concept of "enemy" of international society becomes less clear the trend to include terror within the realm of war will decrease. But we must insure that the purpose does not change. Another conclusion is that since we are in a hostile relationship with a group still holding to those purposes that this fact must be included in establishing the definition of terror by a Korean definition. Looking at documents and studies that have analyzed the definition much difference could be found and that further study was needed towards that purpose, the time of differentiation, the scale of area, the secrecy of its conduct the issue of disclosure and its means and methods.
Therefore, considering the actuator of terror and the purpose, time, area secrecy, means/method the definition of Korean terror is "a person or a group with a special purpose, especially a political purpose, in order to harm the interest of the nation or its people in peace time. To conduct various acts of violence covertly or overtly in a country or out of country" . This is the conclusion of this study.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 目次 = 0
• 表目次 = 0
• 圖目次 = 0
• 國文要約 = 0
• 第1章 序論 = 1
• 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1
• 第2節 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 2
• 第2章 테러리즘에 관한 理論的 體系 = 4
• 第1節 테러리즘에 관한 一般的 理解 = 4
• 第2節 테러리즘 定義에 관한 諸理論 = 10
• 第3節 테러리즘에 관한 槪念上의 問題 = 19
• 第3章 類似槪念과 類型 比較 = 26
• 第1節 戰爭과의 關係 = 26
• 第2節 類似槪念과의 關係 = 40
• 第3節 國際法上의 適用 實態 = 47
• 第4章 韓國的 테러리즘의 槪念 = 52
• 第1節 國內文獻의 槪念分析 = 52
• 第2節 關係訓令의 實態 = 59
• 第3節 韓國的 테러리즘의 槪念定立 = 61
• 第5章 結論 = 65
• * 參考文獻 = 68
• * ARSTRACT = 75