RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      한국 주부의 가사노동의 경제적 가치 평가와 대(對) GNP 비율 추정 = (An) Evaluation of economic value and estimation the ratio to GNP of housework in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T2163680

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        대구 : 경북대학교 대학원, 1995

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(박사) -- 경북대학교 대학원 , 가정학과 가정관리전공 , 1995. 2

      • 발행연도

        1995

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • KDC

        591 판사항(4)

      • DDC

        640.43 판사항(19)

      • 발행국(도시)

        대구

      • 형태사항

        152p. : 삽도 ; 26cm.

      • 일반주기명

        부록수록
        참고문헌: p. 119-130

      • 소장기관
        • 강원대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 경북대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 경상국립대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
        • 국립창원대학교 도서관 (창원캠퍼스) 소장기관정보
        • 연세대학교 학술문화처 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 전남대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 중앙대학교 안성캠퍼스 학술정보원 소장기관정보
        • 충남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 충북대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 한국교원대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 한동대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to evaluate of economic value of housework, and is to estimate the ratio of GNP. For this purpose the economic value of housework was measured by five methods specialized substitute method, overall substitute method, opportunity cost method, reservation wage method, subjective evaluation method.
      815 housewives were samples in Taegu and Kyungsangpookdo for this study. The statistics used for data analysis were frequency, percentile, T-test facor analysis, Pearson's correlation, one-way ANOVA, Multiple Regression analysis by SPSS PC programs.
      The major findings were as follow;
      (1) The average housework time of housewives in 1992 was 7,8hours per day. Full-time housewives spent 8.2hours and employes housewives spent 6.7hours to housework.
      (2) The average monetary values of housework of housewives in 1992 were
      ① Specialized substitute method - 640,800won
      ② Overall substitute method - 762,900won
      ③ Opportunity cost method - 638,100won
      ④ Reservation wage method - 535,000won
      ⑤ Subjective evaluation method - 646,200won
      There were some differences in monetary values by housewife's employment status and region.
      (3) The variables which affected the monetary value of housework suggested relatively definite trend. Namely, values of housework by tow methods of the former showed significant differences by family number, education level of the housewife, age of housewife and the last child, number of preschool child, number of children, period of marriage, employment status of housewife. On the other hand, value of housework by three methods of the latter showed significant differences by income, education level of the housewife, age of housewife.
      (4) To estimate the value of individual housewife's housework, regression equation and unstandardized coefficient were suggested through the variables such as number of family, age of the last child and housewife, income, education level of the housewife, employment status of housewife.
      It helps to measure the value of housework of each housewife
      (5) The estimates of the economic value of housework were approximately 41.95percent of the GNP by specialized substitute method and 51.90percent by overall substitute method, 35.66percent by opportunity cost method, 32.80percent by reservation wage method and 38.67percent by subjective evaluation method.
      So, specialized substitute method and overall substitute method which the value is estimated in terms of the housework time can be used for the purpose of measuring proper compensation to their home and society.
      On the other hand, in the situation of decision making between the housework and the market work, housewives can compare the values estimated between specialized substitute method, overall substitute method and opportunity cost method.
      By estimating the percentage to GNP, this study contributed to approve the productivity of housework.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to evaluate of economic value of housework, and is to estimate the ratio of GNP. For this purpose the economic value of housework was measured by five methods specialized substitute method, overall substitute method, oppor...

      The purpose of this study is to evaluate of economic value of housework, and is to estimate the ratio of GNP. For this purpose the economic value of housework was measured by five methods specialized substitute method, overall substitute method, opportunity cost method, reservation wage method, subjective evaluation method.
      815 housewives were samples in Taegu and Kyungsangpookdo for this study. The statistics used for data analysis were frequency, percentile, T-test facor analysis, Pearson's correlation, one-way ANOVA, Multiple Regression analysis by SPSS PC programs.
      The major findings were as follow;
      (1) The average housework time of housewives in 1992 was 7,8hours per day. Full-time housewives spent 8.2hours and employes housewives spent 6.7hours to housework.
      (2) The average monetary values of housework of housewives in 1992 were
      ① Specialized substitute method - 640,800won
      ② Overall substitute method - 762,900won
      ③ Opportunity cost method - 638,100won
      ④ Reservation wage method - 535,000won
      ⑤ Subjective evaluation method - 646,200won
      There were some differences in monetary values by housewife's employment status and region.
      (3) The variables which affected the monetary value of housework suggested relatively definite trend. Namely, values of housework by tow methods of the former showed significant differences by family number, education level of the housewife, age of housewife and the last child, number of preschool child, number of children, period of marriage, employment status of housewife. On the other hand, value of housework by three methods of the latter showed significant differences by income, education level of the housewife, age of housewife.
      (4) To estimate the value of individual housewife's housework, regression equation and unstandardized coefficient were suggested through the variables such as number of family, age of the last child and housewife, income, education level of the housewife, employment status of housewife.
      It helps to measure the value of housework of each housewife
      (5) The estimates of the economic value of housework were approximately 41.95percent of the GNP by specialized substitute method and 51.90percent by overall substitute method, 35.66percent by opportunity cost method, 32.80percent by reservation wage method and 38.67percent by subjective evaluation method.
      So, specialized substitute method and overall substitute method which the value is estimated in terms of the housework time can be used for the purpose of measuring proper compensation to their home and society.
      On the other hand, in the situation of decision making between the housework and the market work, housewives can compare the values estimated between specialized substitute method, overall substitute method and opportunity cost method.
      By estimating the percentage to GNP, this study contributed to approve the productivity of housework.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차 = i
      • 표목차 = iii
      • I. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 문제의 제기 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 중요성 = 5
      • 목차 = i
      • 표목차 = iii
      • I. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 문제의 제기 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 중요성 = 5
      • II. 이론적 배경 및 선행 연구의 고찰 = 8
      • 1. 가사노동의 생산성과 가치 = 8
      • 1) 가사노동의 생산성 = 8
      • 2) 가사노동의 가치 = 13
      • 2. 가사노동 가치의 평가 = 16
      • 1) 가사노동 가치 평가의 의의 = 16
      • 2) 가사노동 가치의 평가 방법 = 20
      • 3. 가사노동과 GNP = 34
      • 1) GNP의 제한점 = 34
      • 2) 대(對) GNP 비율 추정 방법 = 37
      • III. 연구 방법 = 42
      • 1. 연구 대상 = 42
      • 2. 조사 도구 = 45
      • 3. 절차 = 51
      • 4. 자료 분석 = 51
      • IV. 결과 및 논의 = 53
      • 1. 가사노동 시간 = 53
      • 1) 가사노동 시간 비교 = 53
      • 2) 가정환경적 변인에 따른 가사노동 시간 = 63
      • 2. 실증분석 = 67
      • 1) 가사노동의 화폐가치 = 67
      • (1) 평가 방법별 가사노동 가치 = 67
      • (2) 평가방법별 가사노동 가치의 분산 분석 = 72
      • (3) 평가방법별 가사노동 가치의 회귀분석 = 90
      • 2) 가사노동 가치의 대(對) GNP 비율 = 100
      • (1) 전문가 대체법에 의한 추정 = 101
      • (2) 종합적 대체법 (가정부와 관리자 2인 대체법)에 의한 추정 = 104
      • (3) 기회비용법에 의한 추정 = 107
      • (4) 요구임금법에 의한 추정 = 110
      • (5) 주관적 평가법에 의한 추정 = 110
      • V. 결론 및 제언 = 114
      • 참고문헌 = 119
      • (Abstract) = 131
      • 부록 = 135
      • 〈설문지〉 = 141
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼