RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    20세기 이후 중국과 서양 음악 융합에 관한 연구 : - 역사적 전개 · 사례 분석 · 이론적 구성을 중심으로 - = A Study of the Fusion of Chinese and Western Music Since the 20th Century :Focusing on Historical Development, Case Analysis, and Theoretical Construction

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17568108

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Abstract
    Since the twentieth century, the fusion of Chinese and Western music in Chinese musical composition has remained an important issue in the development of modern music. It concerns not only how Chinese composers absorb and transform Western modern compositional experience, but also how traditional musical resources are reorganized within a modern context and further developed into a musical language with a strong sense of subjectivity. Although previous studies have accumulated considerable achievements in historical review, cultural comparison, and case analysis, they still lack a relatively systematic theoretical refinement regarding how the fusion of Chinese and Western music is truly realized within musical works, what kinds of relational differences exist among various fusion works, and by what standards such works should be evaluated. On this basis, this study takes the fusion of Chinese and Western music in Chinese musical composition since the twentieth century as its object of inquiry. Drawing on theoretical comparison, historical investigation, and case analysis, it seeks to summarize and interpret this issue from three dimensions: ​paths of fusion,​ ​modes of fusion,​ and ​dimensions of evaluation.​
    This study first compares the deeper differences between Chinese and Western music in terms of compositional concepts, pitch concepts, rhythmic consciousness, and structural thinking, and points out that the fusion of Chinese and Western music is not a simple juxtaposition of Chinese elements and Western techniques, but rather a dynamic process in which different musical logics continuously establish, adjust, and reorganize their relationships within a work. Secondly, through an examination of the developmental trajectory of Chinese musical composition since the twentieth century, this study argues that the fusion of Chinese and Western music has broadly undergone four stages: ​technique borrowing,​ ​nationalized practice,​ ​the formation of a new musical grammar,​ and ​cross-cultural dialogue.​ This process reveals a developmental trend moving gradually from the integration of surface materials toward the construction of deeper sonic concepts, structural concepts, and cultural subjectivity.
    In the case analysis section, this study selects Zhu Jian'er's Symphony No. 10, Jiang Xue and Tan Dun's Map as representative works. Jiang Xue demonstrates the structural transformation of traditional Chinese aesthetic spirit within a modern symphonic context through the composite organization of guqin, chant-like recitation, serial materials, and symphonic sonority. Map, by contrast, advances the fusion of Chinese and Western music to the level of media dialogue and the reconstruction of modes of cultural presence through its cross-temporal and cross-spatial organization of local sounds, modern media, and live concerto performance. These two case studies show that the depth of Chinese-Western musical fusion does not depend on the quantity of national elements employed, but on whether sound resources from different origins can form genuine, effective, and organically unified relationships within the work.
    On this basis, this study proposes that the fusion of Chinese and Western music is mainly realized through five dimensions: pitch, rhythm, timbre, structure, and media/presentation, and that it may be summarized into several dominant modes, including symbolic suggestion, grammatical integration, conceptual reconstruction, and media dialogue. At the same time, the evaluation of fusion works should not remain at the level of material identification or stylistic classification, but should instead comprehensively consider the effectiveness of material organization, the unity of structural generation, the depth of cultural translation, the distinctiveness of subjective style, and the potential of auditory experience and reception. In this sense, the fusion of Chinese and Western music is not only an important phenomenon in the history of modern Chinese music, but also a crucial path through which contemporary Chinese music continually reorganizes traditional experience and constructs cultural subjectivity.
    번역하기

    Abstract Since the twentieth century, the fusion of Chinese and Western music in Chinese musical composition has remained an important issue in the development of modern music. It concerns not only how Chinese composers absorb and transform Western ...

    Abstract
    Since the twentieth century, the fusion of Chinese and Western music in Chinese musical composition has remained an important issue in the development of modern music. It concerns not only how Chinese composers absorb and transform Western modern compositional experience, but also how traditional musical resources are reorganized within a modern context and further developed into a musical language with a strong sense of subjectivity. Although previous studies have accumulated considerable achievements in historical review, cultural comparison, and case analysis, they still lack a relatively systematic theoretical refinement regarding how the fusion of Chinese and Western music is truly realized within musical works, what kinds of relational differences exist among various fusion works, and by what standards such works should be evaluated. On this basis, this study takes the fusion of Chinese and Western music in Chinese musical composition since the twentieth century as its object of inquiry. Drawing on theoretical comparison, historical investigation, and case analysis, it seeks to summarize and interpret this issue from three dimensions: ​paths of fusion,​ ​modes of fusion,​ and ​dimensions of evaluation.​
    This study first compares the deeper differences between Chinese and Western music in terms of compositional concepts, pitch concepts, rhythmic consciousness, and structural thinking, and points out that the fusion of Chinese and Western music is not a simple juxtaposition of Chinese elements and Western techniques, but rather a dynamic process in which different musical logics continuously establish, adjust, and reorganize their relationships within a work. Secondly, through an examination of the developmental trajectory of Chinese musical composition since the twentieth century, this study argues that the fusion of Chinese and Western music has broadly undergone four stages: ​technique borrowing,​ ​nationalized practice,​ ​the formation of a new musical grammar,​ and ​cross-cultural dialogue.​ This process reveals a developmental trend moving gradually from the integration of surface materials toward the construction of deeper sonic concepts, structural concepts, and cultural subjectivity.
    In the case analysis section, this study selects Zhu Jian'er's Symphony No. 10, Jiang Xue and Tan Dun's Map as representative works. Jiang Xue demonstrates the structural transformation of traditional Chinese aesthetic spirit within a modern symphonic context through the composite organization of guqin, chant-like recitation, serial materials, and symphonic sonority. Map, by contrast, advances the fusion of Chinese and Western music to the level of media dialogue and the reconstruction of modes of cultural presence through its cross-temporal and cross-spatial organization of local sounds, modern media, and live concerto performance. These two case studies show that the depth of Chinese-Western musical fusion does not depend on the quantity of national elements employed, but on whether sound resources from different origins can form genuine, effective, and organically unified relationships within the work.
    On this basis, this study proposes that the fusion of Chinese and Western music is mainly realized through five dimensions: pitch, rhythm, timbre, structure, and media/presentation, and that it may be summarized into several dominant modes, including symbolic suggestion, grammatical integration, conceptual reconstruction, and media dialogue. At the same time, the evaluation of fusion works should not remain at the level of material identification or stylistic classification, but should instead comprehensively consider the effectiveness of material organization, the unity of structural generation, the depth of cultural translation, the distinctiveness of subjective style, and the potential of auditory experience and reception. In this sense, the fusion of Chinese and Western music is not only an important phenomenon in the history of modern Chinese music, but also a crucial path through which contemporary Chinese music continually reorganizes traditional experience and constructs cultural subjectivity.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 서  론 1
    • 1. 연구의 목적 1
    • 2. 연구 방법 5
    • 3.선행 연구 9
    • 1) 중·서양 음악 비교와 철학적 기반 연구 9
    • I. 서  론 1
    • 1. 연구의 목적 1
    • 2. 연구 방법 5
    • 3.선행 연구 9
    • 1) 중·서양 음악 비교와 철학적 기반 연구 9
    • 2) 역사적 전개와 교류 맥락의 정리 11
    • 3) 작곡가의 개별적 창작사례 연구 13
    • 4) 방법론적 전개와 학문적 성찰 16
    • II. 본 론 20
    • 1. 중국과 서양 음악 이론 체계의 비교 20
    • 1)중국과 서양 음악의 창작 이념 20
    • (1) 중국 음악 20
    • (2) 서양 음악 25
    • 2)중국과 서양 음악의 조성 체계 32
    • (1) 자연적 조화와 수리적 질서 33
    • (2) 중국의 궁조(宮調) 이론 37
    • (3) 중·서양 음악 ​‘십이음’​ 관념의 문화적 차이 41
    • 3)중국과 서양 음악의 리듬 차이 45
    • (1) 중국 음악의 ​탄성적 리듬​ 45
    • (2) 서양 음악의 ​규칙적 리듬 48
    • 4)중국과 서양 음악의 구조적 사고 52
    • (1) 중국 음악 ​강운(腔韻)​의 자연적 전연(展衍) 53
    • (2) 서양 음악 동기의 논리적 발전 56
    • 5)소결 60
    • 2. 중국과 서양 음악 융합의 역사적 전개 62
    • 1)제1단계 기법의 차용 (1900-1949) 63
    • (1) 학당 악가의 보급과 샤오유메이의 초기 실천 64
    • (2) 자오위안런의 이론적 구상과 창작 실천 68
    • (3) 황쯔의 학원파적 창작과 교육적 영향 73
    • (4) 소결 78
    • 2)제2단계 ​민족화​의 실천 (1950-1979) 80
    • (1) ​표제성​과 ​선율 중심​의 융합 모드 82
    • (2) 창작 측면 대표적 사례 86
    • (3) 소결 91
    • 3)제3단계 새로운 ​음악 어법​의 생성 (1980-1999) 92
    • (1) ​형식적 융합​에서 ​문화적 대화​로 94
    • (2) ​선율 중심​에서 ​음색/음향 중심​으로 96
    • (3) ​정치에의 봉사​에서 ​개인과 문화 정체성의 표현​으로 98
    • (4) 소결 99
    • 4)제4단계 세계화 시대의 크로스문화 대화 (21세기 이후) 101
    • (1) 융합 차원의 심화 102
    • (2) 천치강과 예샤오강의 개성적 실천 104
    • (3) 소결 107
    • 3. 중국과 서양 음악 융합의 사례 분석 113
    • 1)주젠얼의 <제10교향곡 강설> 분석 114
    • (1) 융합 메커니즘의 구조적 틀 116
    • (2) 융합 메커니즘 분석 120
    • (3) 미학적 함의의 통일—융합의 심층적 구현 149
    • (4) 소결 154
    • 2)탄둔의 <지도> 분석 155
    • (1) 민속 음향과 자연 음향의 구조적 번역적 전환 157
    • (2) 민속문화의 ​의례-정서 구조력​ 내면화 165
    • (3) 서양 전통 협주곡 장르의 해체와 재구성 176
    • (4) 소결 179
    • 3) 소결 179
    • 4. 중국과 서양 음악 융합의 이론적 구성 181
    • 1)융합 경로 182
    • (1) 음고 경로 183
    • (2) 리듬 경로 185
    • (3) 음색 경로 188
    • (4) 구조 경로 191
    • (5) 매체와 제시 경로 193
    • (6) 경로들 사이의 복합 관계 195
    • 2)융합 모드 196
    • (1) 기호 제시형 197
    • (2) 어법 통합형 199
    • (3) 관념 재구성형 201
    • (4) 매체 대화형 202
    • (5) 모드 간의 연속성 204
    • 3)평가 차원 205
    • (1) 재료 조직의 유효성 206
    • (2) 구조 생성의 통일성 208
    • (3) 문화 전환의 깊이 209
    • (4) 주체적 스타일의 독자성 211
    • (5) 청각 경험과 수용 잠재력 213
    • (6) 반례 보정-평가 틀의 경계 의식 214
    • 4)소결 216
    • III. 결 론 218
    • 참고문헌 223
    • Abstract 232
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼